Decision No. CIC/YA/A/2014/000114 dated 28-01

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place,
New Delhi-110066
F.No.CIC/SS/A/2013/002796-YA
F.No.CIC/YA/A/2014/000114
Date of Hearing
:
28.01.2015
Date of Decision
:
28.01.2015
Appellant
:
Shri D.B. Kumar
Visakhapatnam
Respondent
:
Shri K.V.K. Chand,
Deputy Secretary & CPIO
Visakhapatnam Port Trust
Visakhapatnam
Information Commissioner
:
Shri Yashovardhan Azad
:
:
:
:
:
23.07.2013
23.08.2013
26.08.2013 & 02.09.2013
22.10.2013
25.10.2013 & 24.12.2013
Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on
PIO replied on
First Appeal filed on
First Appellate Authority (FAA) order on
Second Appeal received on
Information sought:
Appellant vide his RTI applications has sought information on 32 points relating to post of
Personnel Officer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust.
Relevant facts emerging during hearing:
Both the second appeals are raised against the same RTI application and are thus clubbed
together for hearing and disposal.
Both the parties are present and heard through video conference.
Appellant sought the above information by filing an RTI application dated 23.07.2013. PIO
vide reply dated 23.08.2013 denied the information on the ground that any issue relating to the
service matter are not covered under the purview of the RTI Act. FAA vide order dated
22.10.2013 directed the PIO to furnish the information on the specific points. Having not
received any response from the PIO in compliance of FAA order, the appellant filed second
appeal before the Commission.
Appellant submitted that no information has been provided to him till today even after the
order passed by the first appellate authority. Respondent submitted that the information was
not provided to the appellant as the result was not declared at the relevant time and was kept in
sealed cover. On a query by the Commission as to whether he has gone through the RTI
application or not, the respondent is not able to answer the same. Further, the Commission
desired to know as to whether FAA in his order discussed all the points of the RTI application
specifying what information directed to be provided and what not. The respondent replied in
the affirmative.
Decision:
After hearing both the parties and on perusal of record, the Commission directs the respondent
to comply with the order of the first appellate authority within two weeks of receipt of this
order under intimation to the Commission.
Show cause notice is issued to the PIO, Visakhapatnam Port Trust, General Admn. Department,
Personnel Division, for deliberately not providing information to the appellant and not
complying with the order of FAA. PIO is afforded an opportunity of personal hearing on
26.02.2015 at 4 PM on which date he must present himself before the Commission. Written
submission, if any, should reach the Commission by 19.02.2015 positively. If there are other
persons responsible for not providing the information to the appellant, the PIO is directed to
inform such persons in writing about the show cause notice and direct them to submit their
written submissions, if any, and to attend the Commission’s hearing on the above mentioned
date. In case the PIO, Visakhapatnam Port Trust, General Admn. Department, Personnel
Division fails to comply with the Commission’s directions, it will be construed that he is the
only person responsible for not providing information to the appellant as sought in his RTI
application.
The appeals are disposed of accordingly.
(Yashovardhan Azad)
Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against application and
payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this Commission.
(B.D. Harit)
Deputy Secretary & Deputy Registrar