1. Healthcare

FY 2015-2016
CAPITAL BUDGET
DEPARTMENT
Project #
2014-15
Department Priority. Project Description
Council
Approved
2015-2016
Department
Request
2016-17
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2017-18
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2018-19
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2019-20
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
Finance
Recommend
A. POLICE
1. Tactical Vests
38,000
38,000
2. Mobile Commad Vehicle
09153010C0540
Building Access FOB system
119,000
119,000
$119,000
$119,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
550,000
550,000
100,000
100,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
3,000,000
300,000
75,000
Hypalon Tubes for inflatable boat
SUBTOTAL - POLICE DEPARTMENT
$75,000
COMBINED DISPATCH
1. Radio Communication Upgrade
09153610C0541
Radio Receiver Relocation
SUBTOTAL - COMBINED DISPATCH
$38,000
$38,000
220,000
220,000
$220,000
$220,000
95,000
95,000
35,000
35,000
120,000
120,000
80,000
$80,000
B. FIRE
1. Vehicle Replacement
09153110C0412
2. Various Stations: Repairs & Replacements
30,000
3. Fire Station Paving
09153110C0437
C0343
C0310
4. Apparatus Replacement
550,000
5. 100 Fairfield Ave (Mx) Building Repairs
475,000
475,000
6. SCBA Replacement
280,000
280,000
7. New Station #6
2,500,000
New Canaan (Stn#2) Renovations
09153110C0542
Removal of Underground Storage Tanks
SUBTOTAL - FIRE DEPARTMENT
C. PUBLIC WORKS
09157100A-1. City Hall Repairs & Improvements
C0439
09157100C0476
09157100C0266
09157100C0119
09157100C0149
09157100C0137
09157100C0325
09157100C0295
09157100C0133
A-2. Various City Bldgs - General Capital Repairs
35,000
$615,000
$250,000
$250,000
$585,000
$585,000
$790,000
$790,000
$3,135,000
$435,000
$1,035,000
$3,535,000
730,000
914,000
706,000
530,000
738,000
265,000
265,000
300,000
300,000
203,000
203,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
25,000
25,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
A-3. Nathaniel Ely
145,000
160,000
160,000
35,000
35,000
750,000
750,000
A-4. Public Works Center - Repairs/Improvements
105,000
218,000
218,000
250,000
250,000
A-5. Energy Conservation Various Locations
25,000
50,000
50,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
A-6. Police Headquarters
20,000
49,000
49,000
A-7. Lockwood House
30,000
80,000
80,000
A-8. Ben Franklin
77,000
48,000
48,000
165,000
165,000
165,000
165,000
167,000
167,000
A-9. Main Library
100,000
42,000
42,000
535,000
535,000
105,000
105,000
16,000
16,000
15,000
0
A-10. Life Safety-Various Buildings
Page 1 of 6
FY 2015-2016
CAPITAL BUDGET
DEPARTMENT
Project #
2015-2016
2014-15
Department Priority. Project Description
09157100C0543
A-11. Various Bldgs - Environmental Remediation
09154021C0392
C0526
B-1. Perry Avenue Bridge Over Norwalk River
BUILDING MANAGEMENT SUBTOTAL
Council
Approved
Department
Request
B-4. James Street Bridge over Silvermine
B-5. General Bridge & Retaining Wall Repairs
C0471
B-6. East Avenue Roadway/Bridge
09154031C0313
C0407
Department
Request
Finance
Recommend
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
$1,610,000
$1,818,000
$1,380,000
$1,380,000
$578,000
$578,000
$298,000
$298,000
250,000
0
1,000,000
0
30,000
0
300,000
0
65,000
65,000
$1,365,000
$65,000
250,000
30,000
65,000
$65,000
$615,000
805,000
770,000
330,000
790,000
790,000
966,000
966,000
883,000
883,000
440,000
440,000
FLEET SUBTOTAL
$805,000
$770,000
$330,000
$790,000
$790,000
$966,000
$966,000
$883,000
$883,000
$440,000
$440,000
60,000
0
60,000
0
60,000
0
60,000
0
60,000
0
MAPPING SUBTOTAL
$0
$60,000
$0
$60,000
$0
$60,000
$0
$60,000
$0
$60,000
$0
5,000,000
6,000,000
5,500,000
6,000,000
5,500,000
6,000,000
5,500,000
6,000,000
5,500,000
6,000,000
6,000,000
250,000
0
750,000
600,000
1,500,000
0
$7,000,000
$6,100,000
$6,000,000
$5,750,000
$6,000,000
$5,500,000
$6,000,000
$5,500,000
$7,500,000
$6,000,000
500,000
0
500,000
0
500,000
0
500,000
0
500,000
0
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
600,000
1,000,000
600,000
1,000,000
700,000
1,000,000
700,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
28,000
28,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
$500,000
$1,628,000
$1,128,000
$1,600,000
$700,000
$1,650,000
$750,000
$1,600,000
$800,000
$1,650,000
$850,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
E-1. Pavement Management Program
E-3. Norwalk River Valley Trail
E-4. Washington Street - Water to MLK
C0318
F-2. Sidewalks & Curbing - Citywide
C0503
F-3. Footpath Replacement
C0349
F-4. Sidewalk and Curb - City Bldgs & Property
C0302
G-1. General Drainage
SIDEWALKS SUBTOTAL
G-2. Watercourse Maintenance
C0425
G-7. Stormwater Management Plan
$5,200,000
500,000
250,000
350,000
0
1,000,000
0
0
1,000,000
250,000
1,000,000
250,000
1,000,000
250,000
250,000
500,000
100,000
200,000
100,000
200,000
100,000
200,000
100,000
100,000
300,000
300,000
0
300,000
300,000
4,000,000
0
2,000,000
2,000,000
400,000
400,000
G-3. Keeler Brook Drainage Area
G-4. Culvert Rehabilitation
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SUBTOTAL
$1,000,000
1,500,000
G-5. Water Street Outlet Maintenance
H-1. Traffic Signals at Various Locations
$0
200,000
G-2 Honeysuckle-Daphne Diversion
C0440
$30,000
65,000
$190,000
C-1. Fleet Replacement
$0
1,000,000
300,000
BRIDGES SUBTOTAL
PAVEMENT PROGRAMS SUBTOTAL
C0232
Finance
Recommend
20,000
296,000
F-1. Sidewalks and Curbing - Road Paving
C0395
Department
Request
20,000
$1,403,000
$296,000
Finance
Recommend
2019-20
20,000
296,000
$576,000
Department
Request
2018-19
20,000
$1,626,000
E-2. City Hall Parking Facilities
09154021C0405
Finance
Recommend
190,000
D-1. Drainage System Mapping
09154021C0021
Department
Request
2017-18
$1,302,000
B-3. Perry Avenue Bridge over Silvermine (pointing)
C0315
Finance
Recommend
20,000
B-2. Glover Avenue Bridge Improvements
C0496
2016-17
$250,000
$2,850,000
$350,000
$3,000,000
$900,000
$6,100,000
$1,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,900,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
$500,000
$600,000
Page 2 of 6
FY 2015-2016
CAPITAL BUDGET
DEPARTMENT
Project #
2015-2016
2014-15
Department Priority. Project Description
Council
Approved
Department
Request
H-2. Striping and Signing (incl. bike lanes)
H-3. Incident Management System
09154031CO514
C0528
H-4. Transportation Master Plan Implementation
Finance
Recommend
300,000
150,000
250,000
0
Department
Request
2017-18
Finance
Recommend
150,000
200,000
Department
Request
200,000
2018-19
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2019-20
Finance
Recommend
200,000
Department
Request
200,000
Finance
Recommend
200,000
750,000
0
750,000
0
100,000
0
100,000
0
1,320,000
400,000
1,800,000
400,000
500,000
400,000
500,000
400,000
$2,320,000
$800,000
$3,000,000
$850,000
$850,000
$650,000
$800,000
$600,000
Traffic System Enhancements
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SUBTOTAL
09154031C0233
2016-17
I-1. Tree Planting General
TREE PLANTING SUBTOTAL
$200,000
$800,000
$400,000
50,000
60,000
50,000
60,000
50,000
60,000
50,000
60,000
50,000
60,000
50,000
$50,000
$60,000
$50,000
$60,000
$50,000
$60,000
$50,000
$60,000
$50,000
$60,000
$50,000
250,000
250,000
CO234
J-1. FHWA Matching Funds
250,000
250,000
C0441
J-2. Safe Routes to Schools
200,000
200,000
$450,000
$450,000
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$0
$0
C0515
K-1. Transfer Station-Compactor Replacement
SAFETEALU MATCH SUBTOTAL
$0
$0
$0
276,000
140,000
140,000
$276,000
$140,000
$140,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,773,000
$15,510,000
$10,197,000
$17,255,000
$11,323,000
$19,216,000
$10,526,000
$14,346,000
$12,226,000
$11,308,000
$9,838,000
747,000
747,000
747,000
747,000
747,000
747,000
747,000
747,000
K-2. Document Management System
PUBLIC WORKS OTHER SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL - PUBLIC WORKS
D. PARKING AUTHORITY
C0303
1. Parking Facilities
C0465
2 Revenue Control (smart parking)
SUBTOTAL - PARKING AUTHORITY
$0
$0
E. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. WWTP Main Lift Pump Replacement
3,000,000
3,000,000
2. Ely Ave/Bouton Str. Hydraulic Repair
1,000,000
1,000,000
09154062C0544
09154062C0545
$0
200,000
200,000
300,000
300,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
$947,000
$947,000
$1,047,000
$1,047,000
$897,000
$897,000
$897,000
$897,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
3. Supplemental Treatment Upgrade
500,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
4. Solids Handling Facility
200,000
3,000,000
3,000,000
5. Keeler Brook Pump Station Upgrade
09154062C0361
09154062C0360
6. Collection System Rehabilitation
Pump Station Upgrade/Replacement
SUBTOTAL - WPCA
1,000,000
$1,950,000
F. BOARD OF EDUCATION
1. Norwalk Early Childhood Center (Phase 2)
2. District Building Management System (BMS)
09155010C0112
3. District Technology
521,000
$4,000,000
$4,000,000
557,000
557,000
1,000,000
500,000
1,033,000
750,000
800,000
75,000
$7,000,000
$7,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
$4,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
1,033,000
750,000
1,033,000
750,000
1,033,000
750,000
500,000
1,033,000
.
4. West Rocks MS Window Replacement
2,000,000
250,000
750,000
.
725,000
Page 3 of 6
FY 2015-2016
CAPITAL BUDGET
DEPARTMENT
Project #
09155010C0516
2014-15
Department Priority. Project Description
5. District Paving & Concrete
Council
Approved
100,000
6. District Fire Alarm System
TBD
7. Jefferson Elementary School Construction
TBD
8. Cranbury Elementary School Construction
District Common Core State Standards
2,358,000
Enhancement to School Security
1,725,000
2015-2016
Department
Request
2016-17
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2017-18
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
535,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
280,000
500,000
50,000
500,000
500,000
358,000
358,000
256,000
$3,183,000
2018-19
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2019-20
Finance
Recommend
0
315,000
315,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
500,000
7,949,000
7,949,000
256,000
5,757,000
5,757,000
$10,018,000
$9,205,000
$7,605,000
45,000
45,000
900,000
300,000
Department
Request
Finance
Recommend
500,000
500,000
$7,322,000
$1,533,000
$1,250,000
400,000
300,000
400,000
300,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
35,000
C0538
C0537
Rowayton Elementary School Construction
780,000
C0519
TBD
District Gymnasium Equipment
TBD
District Stage Rigging & Curtains
TBD
Columbus Elementary School Construction
SUBTOTAL - BOARD OF EDUCATION
G. RECREATION & PARKS
091560301. Vehicles
C0486
09156030C0367
2. Veterans Memorial Park
$5,484,000
$4,425,000
$2,282,000
194,000
188,000
188,000
70,000
70,000
75,000
1,600,000
800,000
1,660,000
800,000
1,620,000
500,000
350,000
350,000
1,600,000
300,000
3. Brien McMahon Replace/Refurb. Turf Fields
TBD
09156030C0366
09156030C0131
09156030C0321
09156030C0364
09156030C0462
09156030C0370
09156030C0372
4. Cranbury Park/Gallaher Estate
550,000
$2,241,000
5. Backstop & Fencing Improvements
35,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
6. Basketball & Tennis Courts
54,000
165,000
100,000
70,000
70,000
100,000
100,000
7. School & Park Playgrounds
150,000
90,000
90,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
8. Fodor Farm
100,000
40,000
0
9. Tree Planting
40,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
10. Open Space Fund
52,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
11. Rowayton Community Docks
50,000
0
400,000
0
12. Park Lighting Energy Savings
65,000
0
60,000
0
250,000
0
50,000
50,000
400,000
TBD
65,000
TBD
13. Parks Garage Paving of Lot
60,000
0
TBD
14. Oyster Shell Park
750,000
0
150,000
150,000
$4,935,000
$1,625,000
750,000
0
750,000
0
750,000
0
$2,030,000
$740,000
$1,265,000
$465,000
$1,265,000
$880,000
TBD
15. Master Plan of Parks
TBD
09156030C0518
09156030C0546
09156030C0365
09156030C0364
Nathan Hale Athletic Complex
Mathews Park
Calf Pasture Beach
Flax Hill Park
SUBTOTAL - RECREATION AND PARKS
2,000,000
90,000
100,000
50,000
$3,490,000
$4,613,000
$2,163,000
Page 4 of 6
FY 2015-2016
CAPITAL BUDGET
DEPARTMENT
2015-2016
2014-15
Department Priority. Project Description
Project #
Council
Approved
Department
Request
2016-17
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2017-18
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2018-19
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2019-20
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
Finance
Recommend
H. LIBRARY
09156210C0553
1. Library Auditoriums
25,000
2. Children's Rooms Renovation
09156210C0548
3. Norwalk Newspaper Digitization
4. RFID Conversion & Implementation
09156210C0547
Integrated Library System
SUBTOTAL - LIBRARY
C0186
C0430
26,000
45,000
45,000
44,000
44,000
65,000
65,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
22,000
22,000
152,000
0
16,000
0
$82,000
$66,000
$65,000
$65,000
$87,000
$87,000
50,000
50,000
175,000
175,000
150,000
150,000
250,000
150,000
0
50,000
$47,000
0
40,000
40,000
15,000
15,000
2. LMMM Roof Leak Repair
150,000
216,000
216,000
3. Mill Hill Master Plan-ADA Access
100,000
94,000
94,000
150,000
150,000
4. Lockwood House Museum ADA Access
50,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
5. WPA Murals
12,000
25,000
25,000
0
40,000
0
25,000
25,000
10,000
10,000
6. Cemetery Conservation/Restoration
7. LMMM Improvement Project
8. Barn/Smith Street Buildings
10. Mill Hill Buildings
0
$312,000
J. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
1. Choice Neiborhoods District
2. Public Art Fund
150,000
150,000
15,000
15,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
225,000
25,000
150,000
200,000
0
100,000
10,000
0
0
20,000
0
0
0
10,000
0
0
10,000
10,000
0
0
10,000
10,000
225,000
150,000
10,000
0
10,000
0
11. Museum Collection Archive/Cataloguing
SUBTOTAL - HISTORICAL COMMISSION
C0534
26,000
21,000
$199,000
C0374
C0535
23,000
21,000
$62,000
9. Cemetery Site Work
09150910C0288
09150910C0451
09150910C0551
23,000
$62,000
C0294
C0533
18,000
$86,000
I. HISTORICAL COMMISSION
C0501
1. Mathews Park Buildings
09156310C0186
09156310C0521
09156310C0549
09156310C0550
C0294
11,000
18,000
$560,000
$510,000
$660,000
$525,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
500,000
500,000
25,000
25,000
75,000
$440,000
$315,000
$440,000
$460,000
$435,000
$335,000
Affordable Housing
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
Transit Oriented Development
350,000
1,200,000
500,000
1,000,000
500,000
1,000,000
500,000
1,000,000
500,000
Head of the Harbor
350,000
Bikeway Planning & Construction
0
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
Façade Improvements
0
160,000
150,000
160,000
150,000
160,000
150,000
160,000
150,000
North Water Street Lighting
0
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
SUBTOTAL - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
K. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
091506001. Citywide IT Projects
$950,000
$1,325,000
$1,325,000
$2,610,000
$1,650,000
$2,110,000
$1,350,000
$2,110,000
$1,350,000
$1,910,000
$1,150,000
374,000
647,000
452,000
254,000
254,000
246,000
246,000
195,000
195,000
232,000
232,000
13,000
13,000
117,000
117,000
254,000
254,000
C0375
2. Citywide GIS Technology Projects
Page 5 of 6
FY 2015-2016
CAPITAL BUDGET
DEPARTMENT
Project #
2015-2016
2014-15
Department Priority. Project Description
SUBTOTAL - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Council
Approved
Department
Request
$374,000
2016-17
Finance
Recommend
$660,000
$465,000
30,000
0
$30,000
$0
Department
Request
2017-18
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2018-19
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
2019-20
Finance
Recommend
Department
Request
Finance
Recommend
$371,000
$371,000
$500,000
$500,000
$195,000
$195,000
$232,000
$232,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
L. HEALTH
1. Oil Tank and Trailer
09152012C0552
Security System Replacement
SUBTOTAL - HEALTH
M. HUMAN RELATIONS AND FAIR RENT
C0536
1. ADA Compliance
SUBTOTAL - HR & FAIR RENT
GRAND TOTAL
18,000
$18,000
250,000
345,000
250,000
350,000
250,000
350,000
250,000
350,000
250,000
350,000
250,000
$250,000
$345,000
$250,000
$350,000
$250,000
$350,000
$250,000
$350,000
$250,000
$350,000
$250,000
$22,457,000
$32,038,000
$21,762,000
$37,272,000
$27,625,000
$40,583,000
$28,789,000
$33,408,000
$26,665,000
$20,052,000
$19,454,000
0
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
POLICE DEPARTMENT
75,000
38,000
38,000
119,000
119,000
0
0
0
0
0
COMBINED DISPATCH
80,000
220,000
220,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
615,000
250,000
250,000
585,000
585,000
790,000
790,000
3,135,000
435,000
1,035,000
3,535,000
8,773,000
15,510,000
10,197,000
17,255,000
11,323,000
19,216,000
10,526,000
14,346,000
12,226,000
11,308,000
9,838,000
0
0
0
947,000
947,000
1,047,000
1,047,000
897,000
897,000
897,000
897,000
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1,950,000
4,000,000
4,000,000
7,000,000
7,000,000
4,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
3,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
BOARD OF EDUCATION
5,484,000
4,425,000
2,282,000
2,241,000
3,183,000
10,018,000
9,205,000
7,605,000
7,322,000
1,533,000
1,250,000
RECREATION & PARKS
3,490,000
4,613,000
2,163,000
4,935,000
1,625,000
2,030,000
740,000
1,265,000
465,000
1,265,000
880,000
86,000
62,000
62,000
199,000
47,000
82,000
66,000
65,000
65,000
87,000
87,000
HISTORICAL COMMISSION
312,000
560,000
510,000
660,000
525,000
440,000
315,000
440,000
460,000
435,000
335,000
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
950,000
1,325,000
1,325,000
2,610,000
1,650,000
2,110,000
1,350,000
2,110,000
1,350,000
1,910,000
1,150,000
18,000
30,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
374,000
660,000
465,000
371,000
371,000
500,000
500,000
195,000
195,000
232,000
232,000
FIRE DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
PARKING AUTHORITY
LIBRARY
HEALTH
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
HUMAN RELATIONS & FAIR RENT
250,000
345,000
250,000
350,000
250,000
350,000
250,000
350,000
250,000
350,000
250,000
$22,457,000
$32,038,000
$21,762,000
$37,272,000
$27,625,000
$40,583,000
$28,789,000
$33,408,000
$26,665,000
$20,052,000
$19,454,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
629,000
0
0
0
947,000
947,000
1,047,000
1,047,000
897,000
897,000
897,000
897,000
1,950,000
4,000,000
4,000,000
7,000,000
7,000,000
4,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
3,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
BOARD OF EDUCATION
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REDEVELOPMENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$2,579,000
$4,629,000
$4,629,000
$8,576,000
$8,576,000
$5,676,000
$5,676,000
$4,526,000
$4,526,000
$2,526,000
$2,526,000
$19,878,000
$27,409,000
$17,133,000
$28,696,000
$19,049,000
$34,907,000
$23,113,000
$28,882,000
$22,139,000
$17,526,000
$16,928,000
GRAND TOTAL
LESS: REVENUES
LOCIP
PARKING AUTHORITY
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
SUBTOTAL REVENUES
NET AMOUNT TO BE BONDED
Page 6 of 6
January 30, 2015
Mayor Harry W. Rilling,
Members of the Planning Commission,
Members of the Board of Estimate and Taxation
Members of the Common Council
Transmitted herewith is the compilation of all capital budget requests that I have received for the five-year period beginning July 1, 2015
together with my analysis and recommendations relative to the capital plan and my estimate of the effect of such expenditures on the City’s
operating budget and bonded indebtedness.
INTRODUCTION
The Recommended FY 2015-16 Capital Budget has been developed in the context of a national economy that is finally beginning to show
real signs of recovery. Given the depth of the last recession, however, it behooves us to proceed cautiously. My capital spending
recommendations reflect the expectation that City revenues will continue to grow modestly, and that the ability and willingness of Norwalk
taxpayers to pay higher taxes is limited. By most metrics, the recommended plan would not be considered overly aggressive, and my overall
spending recommendations are in line with the expectations from a year ago. However, even this rather modest future operating budget
impact may be more that some taxpayers are willing to pay. In deciding how large the City’s capital budget ought to be, I urge the City’s
policy makers to carefully consider the future operating budget impact of their decisions.
Under the Recommended Capital Plan, the City’s total outstanding tax-supported debt is projected to increase modestly, from $216.8 million
in FY 2014-15 to $227.6 million in FY 2018-19, an increase of $10.8 million or 5.0%. Total indebtedness is projected to begin declining in
FY 2019-20. These figures exclude debt obligations which will be repaid from sources outside of the general fund. The Recommended
Capital Plan provides for new debt to be repaid from the general fund of $17.1 million in FY 2015-16; $19.0 million in FY 2016-17; $23.1
million in FY 2017-18; $22.1 million in FY 2018-19; and $16.9 million in FY 2019-20.
In analyzing the City’s capital budget and the indebtedness that the City will incur as a result of this budget, we must consider several distinct
factors. Among the items that must be considered are the following:




Capital needs of the city
Impact of the capital plan on debt position and credit rating
Impact of the capital plan on future operating budgets
Level of authorized but unissued debt outstanding for prior capital authorizations and the projected
drawdown schedule
After considering each of these factors, I recommend a gross capital budget for FY 2015-16 of $21,762,000; which will result in a net amount
to be bonded and repaid from the general fund of $17,133,000. The variance between the gross and net capital budgets is due to Local Capital
Improvement Program (LoCIP) grants of $629,000 and $4.0 million in Water Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) projects that will be
repaid from revenues of the WPCA.
Over the five-year horizon of the City’s Capital Improvement Program, I recommend gross capital spending of $124.3 million, with a net
amount to be bonded and repaid from the general fund of $98.4 million. Over the next five years, the City is projected to pay off $99.8
million of debt, so the City’s total indebtedness will not change much, even after factoring in authorized but unissued debt. Provided below is
my analysis that explains and supports how I arrived at the recommended gross and net capital budget amounts, followed by a detailed
summary of the recommended projects.
ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Capital Needs of the City
Meeting the capital needs of the City is of paramount importance in developing a recommended capital spending plan. While favorable debt
ratios are important, it is short-sighted to allow vital City infrastructure to deteriorate or to fail to invest in projects that have a demonstrable
economic payback or which promote the City’s long-term economic vitality.
Infrastructure maintenance and improvements are a vital component to the well being and continued success of the City, and they remain the
top priority of the City’s capital budget for FY 2015-16. The recommended FY 2015-16 capital budget includes nearly $10.2 million for the
Department of Public Works and $4.0 million for the Water Pollution Control Authority. This includes $5.5 million for road paving and $1.1
million for sidewalks—the largest appropriations in the City’s history for these particular projects. The Board of Education will receive
nearly $2.3 million under the recommended capital budget, while Recreation and Parks will receive more than $2.1 million.
The recommended Capital Plan includes a total of $23.2 million for Board of Education capital projects over the next five years. This
includes funds to complete Phase II of the Norwalk Early Childhood Center at Roosevelt School; install Building Management Systems at all
schools; replace windows at West Rocks Middle School; upgrade fire alarm systems; and construct improvements to Jefferson and Cranbury
Elementary schools. In addition, State reimbursement typically amounts to approximately 30% of major building projects, and we would
appropriate these funds after the State approves each project, and the amount of the reimbursement can more accurately be determined.
2
B. Impact of the Capital Plan on Debt Position and Credit Rating
Norwalk has an Aaa/AAA bond rating from all three major rating agencies, and this places Norwalk in an elite group of 18 of the 169
municipalities in Connecticut that have this highest available rating. Because of our strong credit, when Norwalk borrows money we do so at
the lowest interest rates prevailing in the marketplace.
In assigning credit ratings, the rating agencies generally focus on four broad rating factors in a community: Economic Factors (wealth levels,
tax base, employment, regional economy, etc.); Financial Factors (operating results, financial reserves, contingent obligations, etc.);
Administrative Factors (experience of the management team, financial management track record, etc.); and Debt Factors (debt as a % of full
value, debt service as a % of budget, per capita debt, etc.). In order for the City to maintain its “gilt-edged” triple A credit rating, we must
ensure that certain measures of debt remain within the ranges that the rating agencies deem acceptable for a triple A credit, and we must
adhere to a well-crafted, long range capital plan that provides predictability and demonstrates sound and prudent financial planning. While
the rating agencies do not base a rating decision on a single ratio, we know that exceeding the maximum thresholds outlined in Table 1 below
would cause concern among the rating agencies.
Table 1 – Selected Debt Ratio Measures – City vs. Maximum Thresholds
Total Debt as a Percentage of Fair
Market Value
Debt Service as a Percentage of
Expenditures
Per Capita Debt
FY 2014-15 (actual)
1.28%
8.11%
$2,470
FY 2015-16 (recommended)
1.26%
8.33%
$2,464
Maximum Threshold
2.00%
10.00%
$3,500
Total Debt as a percentage of the fair market value of all taxable property is an important measure of debt capacity. Norwalk’s current and
recommended ratios are less than 1.5%; a ratio of less than 2% is considered favorably by the rating agencies. Norwalk’s debt service to
expenditure ratio, at less than 8.5%, is below the established 10.0% maximum threshold. The rating agencies consider ratios below 5% to be
low, from 5% to 15% to be moderate, and above 15% to be high. The City’s per capita debt is moderate at $2,470; also below its maximum
threshold of $3,500. All three debt ratio measures are expected to remain well within their established thresholds during the next five years.
Table 2 below projects the key debt benchmarks over the five-year horizon of the capital plan based on financing the previously approved
projects and the new spending based on the recommended capital plan.
3
Table 2 – Projected City of Norwalk Debt Benchmarks – FY 2015 through FY 2020
Debt Measure
FY 2014-15
FY 2015-16
FY 2016-17
FY 2017-18
FY 2018-19
FY 2019-20
Debt as a % of FMV
1.28%
1.26%
1.27%
1.26%
1.24%
1.20%
Debt Service as a % of
Expenditures
8.11%
8.33%
7.97%
7.84%
8.24%
8.32%
Per Capita Debt
$2,470
$2,464
$2,519
$2,560
$2,567
$2,502
Net Indebtedness – FYE
$ 216,845,929
$ 216,844,819
$ 222,171,425
$ 226,436,475
$ 227,596,067
$ 222,365,666
C. Impact of the Capital Plan on Future Operating Budgets
In approving the capital budget, it is important to recognize that capital spending has a direct impact on the City’s future operating budgets
and tax rates. Amounts that are borrowed must be repaid typically over a fifteen-year period, with interest. After financing previously
approved projects and the recommended capital plan, the City’s annual debt service paid from property taxes is projected to increase from
$25.8 million in FY 2014-15 to $30.6 million in FY 2019-20, an increase of $4.8 million or 18.6% over the next five years. With a current
tax levy of approximately $284.9 million, the increase in debt service will cause a 1.7% tax increase over the next five years. Given the
increasing unwillingness of some members of the public to shoulder a greater tax burden, the members of the Board of Estimate and Taxation
and the Common Council should carefully consider the operating budget impact of the capital plan prior to approving a final capital budget.
Debt service is one of the few items in the operating budget over which we have considerable control, based on the size of the capital budget
that is approved each year. Provided in Table 3 below is a summary of expected debt service over the five year plan.
Table 3 – Projected City of Norwalk Debt Service FY 2014-15 through FY 2019-20
Current Debt Service
Projected New Debt Service
Total Projected Debt Service
Less: Funded from other than Taxes
FY 2014-15
FY 2015-16
FY 2016-17
FY 2017-18
FY 2018-19
FY 2019-20
32,541,265
33,858,261
32,039,865
29,575,677
28,940,884
25,415,617
-
-
1,308,731
4,664,507
8,246,167
11,295,351
32,541,265
33,858,261
33,348,597
34,240,184
37,187,051
36,710,968
7,759,256
7,865,287
7,686,940
8,180,250
8,853,189
7,153,361
4
Total Amount Financed by Taxes
Plus: Non-City Reimbursable
Budgeted Gen. Fund Debt Service
24,782,009
25,992,974
25,661,656
26,059,934
28,333,862
29,557,606
972,734
1,240,496
1,185,985
1,144,945
1,115,161
1,083,808
25,754,743
27,233,470
26,847,641
27,204,879
29,449,022
30,641,414
D. Authorized But Unissued Debt/Projected Drawdown Schedule
In order to finance the remaining authorized but unissued debt, together with the new authorizations under the proposed five-year capital plan,
our financial projections assume the following financing schedule as outlined in Table 4:
Table 4 – Projected Financing Schedule – FY 2016 through FY 2020
FY 2015-16
FY 2016-17
FY 2017-18
FY 2018-19
FY 2019-20
14,807,000
20,416,000
19,013,000
18,039,000
14,255,000
4,000,000
7,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
1,000,000
-
947,000
1,047,000
897,000
970,000
Board of Ed Projects – Net
3,326,000
2,633,000
3,100,000
3,100,000
1,600,000
Five Year Borrowings
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
23,133,000
31,996,000
28,160,000
26,036,000
18,825,000
City Projects
WPCA
Parking Authority
TOTAL
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A total of $163.4 million has been requested from the various departments for the five-year capital improvement program. In the first year,
the requests total $32.0 million. While all of the capital requests have merit, the City does not have the financial capacity to fund them all
while maintaining its debt benchmarks within the parameters required by the rating agencies. Moreover, if all of the requests were approved,
it would result in substantially higher debt service obligations and would cause property taxes to increase further. For this reason, I am
recommending trimming back the requests to a gross total of $124.3 million over the five-year period. The portion of this amount that would
be repaid from property taxes is $98.4 million. For the upcoming FY 2015-16, I have recommended a gross capital budget of $21.8 million
whose net amount to be repaid from future property taxes is $17.1 million. A brief description of the projects recommended for FY 2015-16
follows:
5
Police Department:
The department’s recommended budget totals $38,000 for the replacement of tactical vests.
Combined Dispatch:
The department’s recommended budget totals $220,000 to upgrade radio communications and to improve radio coverage.
Fire Department:
The department’s recommended budget totals $250,000 for the following projects: $95,000 for vehicle replacement; $35,000 for various
station repairs; and $120,000 for paving fire station parking areas.
Public Works
The department’s recommended budget totals $10,197,000 for the following functional areas with the largest projects identified in each area:

Building Management total $1,403,000: City Hall roof replacement, security notification system, and air conditioning system
filtration system - $706,000; Public Works Center repairs and improvements - $218,000; Nathaniel Ely window replacement $160,000; Lockwood House ADA accessibility - $80,000; other building improvements, various locations - $239,000.

Bridges total $296,000: Residual funding required for the 20% City match requirement for the Perry Avenue Bridge over the
Norwalk River.

Fleet total $330,000: One 37,000 lb dump truck - $220,000; F-550 dump truck - $45,000; flatbed truck - $40,000; and
drainage attachments - $25,000.

Road Reconstruction total $6,100,000: City’s pavement management program, $5,500,000; and Norwalk River Valley Trail
20% local match - $600,000.

Sidewalks total $1,128,000: Citywide sidewalk and curbing appropriation - $1,000,000; footpath replacement - $100,000; and
sidewalks & curbs – City buildings, $28,000.

Storm Water Management total $350,000: $250,000 for general drainage repair, and $100,000 for storm water management.
In addition, while no funds were recommended for watercourse maintenance in the FY 2015-16 capital budget, the department
recently requested that the City close out a completed capital project (Buckingham Lockwood Drainage Improvement Project)
6
with an available balance of $876,000, and that these surplus capital funds be appropriated for Watercourse Maintenance. This
request will be presented to the Planning Commission, Board of Estimate and Taxation, and Common Council in the near
future.

Traffic Management total $400,000: $250,000 for Traffic Signal Upgrades, and $150,000 for Striping and Signage (including
Bike Lanes).

Tree Planting total $50,000: Annual appropriation for citywide tree planting.

Transfer Station total $140,000: For the replacement of the third municipal solid waste compactor. The replacement of the
first two compactors was funded in FY 2014-15.
Water Pollution Control Authority
All debt service associated with WPCA projects will be repaid from the revenues of the WPCA. The department’s recommended budget
totals $4,000,000 for the following projects: Main Lift Pump Replacement, $3,000,000; Ely Avenue/Bouton Street Hydraulic Repair,
$1,000,000.
Board of Education
The department’s recommended budget totals $2,282,000 for the following projects: Norwalk Early Childhood Center- Phase II, $557,000;
District Building Management System (BMS), $500,000 per year in each of the next two years; District Technology Plan, $750,000; West
Rocks Middle School Window Replacement, $75,000 for design, with construction to follow in FY 2016-17; District Paving & Curbing,
$350,000; District Fire Alarm System Upgrades, $50,000.
Recreation and Parks
The department’s recommended budget totals $2,163,000 for the following projects: Veteran’s Memorial Park Boat Launch Ramp
Replacement, $800,000; Brien McMahon School Turf Field Replacement, $500,000; Cranbury/Gallaher Estate, $350,000; Vehicles,
$188,000; Basketball and Tennis Court Refurbishment, $100,000; School & Park Playgrounds, $90,000; Backstop and Fencing Replacement,
$50,000; Open Space Fund, $50,000; and Tree Planting, $35,000.
Library
The department’s recommended budget totals $62,000 for the following projects: SoNo Library Auditorium Soundproofing, $18,000;
Children’s Room Renovations, $23,000; and Norwalk Newspaper Digitization, $21,000.
7
Historical Commission
The department’s recommended budget totals $510,000 for the following projects: Mathews Park Buildings Restoration, $40,000; Lockwood
Mathews Mansion Roof, $216,000; Mill Hill Master Plan-ADA access, $94,000; Lockwood House Museum-ADA access, $100,000; WPA
Murals Conservation, $25,000; Lockwood Mathews Mansion Improvements (rewiring), $25,000; and Cemetery Site Work, $10,000.
Redevelopment Agency
The department’s recommended budget totals $1,325,000 for the following projects: Choice Neighborhoods District (infrastructure
improvements), $1,300,000; Public Art, $25,000.
Information Technology
The department’s recommended budget totals $465,000 for all Citywide Information Technology Projects, including funding for the City’s
Technology Refresh Program. The recommended amount reflects the fact that the Information Technology Director has recently identified
$195,000 in surplus funds that is available from prior year capital appropriations that can be applied toward the cost of the projects planned
for FY 2015-16.
Health Department
No funds are recommended for the Health Department in FY 2015-16. The item requested by the Department will be funded from the City’s
Insurance fund.
Human Relations and Fair Rent
The department’s recommended budget totals $250,000 for the continuation of the citywide ADA compliance projects.
8
CONCLUSION
The recommended capital budget for FY 2014-15 totals $21,762,000. With offsetting revenues and other repayment sources, the total amount
that will be bonded and repaid from property taxes is $17,133,000. With the City’s existing debt profile this is the maximum amount of
additional debt that the City can safely afford, while still maintaining favorable debt ratio benchmarks and limiting the impact on future
operating budgets.
I would like to thank the departments and agencies for their cooperation and assistance in compiling this Capital Budget, and commend my
staff for their work in preparing this document. I look forward to assisting the Planning Commission, the Board of Estimate and Taxation,
and the Common Council in evaluating the capital requests and developing a workable, financially sound capital plan.
Respectfully Submitted,
Thomas Hamilton
Director of Finance
9
Existing and Future Debt
250,000,000
200,000,000
Fiscal Year
150,000,000
Future Debt
Existing Debt
100,000,000
50,000,000
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Amount
1
Net Debt as a Percent of Full Equalized Value
2.50%
2.25%
2.00%
1.75%
1.50%
future debt
existing debt
1.25%
ct median
benchmark
1.00%
0.75%
0.50%
0.25%
0.00%
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Fiscal Year
2
Annual Debt Service to General Fund Expenditures
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
`
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
2015
2016
Existing Debt
2017
Future Debt
2018
Benchmark
2019
2020
CT Aaa Median
3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Police
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
2016-17
REQUEST
37,500
1. Tactical Vests
118,950
2. Mobile Command Vehicle
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
37,500
118,950
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Police
PROJECT TITLE: Tactical Vests
PROJECT LIFE: 10 years
SCHEDULED START: Upon Approval
RANKING: 1
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Titan Assault Enhanced BR01 Ballistics NIJ 0101.06 IIIA
Compliant Vest with Molle system
Officer Safety
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
FAV MKII enhanced BR01 Ballistics NIG 0101.06 IIIA Compliant
Vest with Molle System.
APV BR01 Ballistics NIJ 0101.06 IIIA Compliant Vest with Molle
System.
25 Vests @ $1,500 each
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
37,500
37,500
37,500
37,500
37,500
37,500
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
A-1
A-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Police
PROJECT TITLE: Tactical Vests
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes ___
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Approved
$_____________
Yes _ __
No _x__
Request $________________________
No_x _
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Direct quote from manufacturer.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Necessary for officer safety.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Outdated equipment will still be in use.
No. of new positions __________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Police
PROJECT TITLE: Mobile Command Vehicle
PROJECT LIFE: 20 years
SCHEDULED START: Upon Approval
RANKING: 2
X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
The MCV9000/14 is a Mobile Command Vehicle
The design of the MCV9000/14 is dedicated to the process of Mobile Command.
The dual 120V AC / 12V DC power capabilities allow the Emergency Response
Team to operate at an incident scene for extended periods of time. Office type
lighting, roof mounted air conditioning, forced air heating, spacious conference
and radio areas provide a comfortable work environment. All of these features
are provided in a vehicle that is easy to drive, set-up, and operate.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
An emergency can happen at any time and in any place. The MCV9000/14 was
designed so operators can quickly respond to the most remote or hard to get to
incident scene. Unlike larger Command Vehicles, the MCV9000/14 does not
require an operator with CDL licensing or special training to drive the vehicle.
The vehicle features a standard “Van”: front and is very maneuverable in heavy
traffic, on tight city streets, or on small rural roads. With the addition of the
Optional Four Wheel Drive, the vehicle’s mobility is further enhanced for use in
bad weather and rough terrain.
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
118,950
118,950
118,950
118,950
118,950
118,950
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
A-3
A-4
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Mobile Command Vehicle
Police
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $______118,950_____________
Approved
No_ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Direct quote from provider.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Vital to operations at special events where a command post must be set up.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
A decreased efficiency in mobile crime unit command.
No _x__
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Combined Dispatch
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
1. Radio Receiver Upgrade
220,000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
220,000
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Combined Dispatch
PROJECT TITLE: Radio Receiver Upgrade
PROJECT LIFE:
SCHEDULED START: Upon Approval
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
RANKING:
_X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
1
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Radio upgrade to enhance communication system within Norwalk High
School and Brien McMahon High School.
The current radio system is inadequate for the safety of officers and
students at both schools. Radio upgrade will enhance communication
in the surrounding area. The need for this project became more
evident this year due to incidents that occurred where officers had little
or no communication with headquarters, also, there are now full time
School Resource Officers employed at the school.
The price includes the following:
•
Providing IP Gateways for all RX sites on Channel 1
* Existing receivers will be reused
•
Providing GTR8000 repeaters and support equipment for
Hospital, McMahon and Norwalk High for channel 1
•
Providing new antenna system for Norwalk High School
•
Providing TX and RX Multicoupler/combiner for 3 channels for
McMahon and Norwalk High (One channel active now).
•
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Construction
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
220,000
220,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
220,000
220,000
220,000
220,000
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Combined Dispatch
PROJECT TITLE: Radio Receiver Upgrade
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes ___
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Approved
$_____________
Yes _ __
No _X__
Request $________________________
No _X _
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Estimate from vendor
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Project is necessary to maintain communication access.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Lack of communication at schools including the inability of officers to dispatch and receive via radio from both schools.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Fire
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
1. Vehicle Replacement
95
2. Various Station Repairs
35
3. Fire Station Paving
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
35
35
35
35
100
1,000
120
4. Apparatus Replacement
550
5. 100 Fairfield Ave Building Repairs
475
6. SCBA Replacement
280
7. Fire Station
3,000
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
250
585
790
3,135
1,035
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Vehicle Replacement
PROJECT LIFE: 10 years
SCHEDULED START: 2015
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015
RANKING: 1
___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replace Command Car.
Command Car is a heavy use Emergency Response vehicle
operated 24/7 by the shift commander. Existing Ford Diesel has
been problematic.
Replace Cab and Chassis for Flatbed Truck.
Existing Utility Flat Bed is a 1980 Ford. Existing flatbed would be
remounted on new chassis.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
95
95
95
95
95
95
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
B-1
B-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Vehicle Replacement
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $_____________________
Approved
No _X _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
State Bid List..
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Command Vehicle has been problematic (Diesel Motor issues). Flat Bed is 1980, standard transmission vehicle.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Expensive repairs and loss of use of Command Vehicle.
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Various Station Repairs
PROJECT LIFE: 20 years
SCHEDULED START:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
RANKING: 2
___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Four Fire Stations and the Maintenance Facility are in continuous The age of the buildings has created the need for this work.
need of minor – moderate repairs.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
Station
Year Built
Meadow Street
1970
New Canaan Avenue
1964
Westport Avenue
1966
Van Zant Street
1884
Fairfield Avenue
1980
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
35
35
35
35
35
175
35
35
35
35
35
175
35
35
35
35
35
175
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
B-3
B-4
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Various Station Repairs
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $_____________________
Approved
No _ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Previous estimates
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No X___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
No. of new positions __________________
________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The maintenance of the stations is an ongoing need. The department has reduced the number and scope of emergency repairs by systematic and
planned upgrades to our infrastructure.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The department’s infrastructure gets intensive daily use. If the project is not funded we will be forced to make repairs on an emergency basis which
will be very costly.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Fire Station Paving
PROJECT LIFE:
SCHEDULED START: 2015
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2016
RANKING: 3
___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Continuation of paving project funded in FY 2012-2013. Pave rear Rear apron in front of apparatus overhead doors is deteriorating
apron and parking lot at Station #1.
causing wear and tear to trucks. Lot has not been paved in 20+
years.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
140
120
260
140
120
260
140
120
260
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
B-5
B-6
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Fire Station Paving
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $_____________________
Approved
No _X _
$_____________
Not enough funds in FY 2012-2013 project to finish paving at Station #1.
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
DPW Paving Bid FY 2014-2015.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _X__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
No. of new positions __________________
________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Apron has been patched several times. Needs to be completely replaced.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Additional wear and tear on truck suspension due to dips in apron. Unable to plow snow efficiently due to uneven surface and cracks.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Apparatus Replacement
PROJECT LIFE: 15 years
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/16
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015
RANKING: 4
X__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Fire Apparatus Replacement:
Front fire trucks to be replaced on 15 year cycle then moved to
reserve status as recommended by Matrix Consulting.
16/17 Pumping Engine #3.
18/19 Replacement Tractor for Haz-Mat 1
19/20 Aerial Ladder #1.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
550
100
1,000
1,650
550
100
1,000
1,650
550
100
1,000
1,650
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
B-7
B-8
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Apparatus Replacement
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $_____________________
Approved
No _ _
$_____________
Need for Replacement still exists.
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Previous bids.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
No. of new positions __________________
________________
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Increased Maintenance costs can be anticipated if replacement is not funded.
No X___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Fire
PROJECT TITLE: 100 Fairfield Ave. Bldg. Repairs
PROJECT LIFE: 20+ years
SCHEDULED START:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015
RANKING: 5
___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replace roof at Offices, Storage and Apparatus Maintenance facility
(100 Fairfield Avenue).
The existing roof is original to the facility and over 25 years old.
Emergency repairs were completed in 2007 to fix active leaks.
Complete stripping and painting of metal exterior.
Ongoing roof leaks continue to create internal damage. Patching is
expensive and an inadequate solution to this problem.
The Department anticipates use of the facility for offices, vehicle
maintenance, and storage far into the future. The base metal is
unprotected from elements. This city facility is the very first municipal
building that residents and visitors see as they arrive in Norwalk from I95 exit 14. The project is essential to protect the building from further
deterioration and to present a good image of the city to the public.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
25
475
500
25
475
500
25
475
500
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
B-9
B-10
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Fire
PROJECT TITLE: 100 Fairfield Ave. Bldg. Repairs
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $475,000_________________
Approved
No _ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
4 15/15/sq. foot including roof decking and flashing.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
This project is necessary for the safe and efficient use of the facility. The repairs made in 2007 will not provide more than several years of
continued viability of the existing roof.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The department was forced to spend considerable funds to clean the building of extensive mold growth after the roof repairs were completed in
2007. As the building is used more extensively, the return of active roof leaks and mold would be a health hazard and would result in expensive
damage.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Fire
PROJECT TITLE: SCBA Replacement
PROJECT LIFE:
SCHEDULED START: 2017
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2018
RANKING: 6
___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
In 17/18 the department will replace 50 SCBA units and RIT SCBA The SCBA units receive hard use at structure fires and other
units which were originally purchased with a FEMA Fire Act Grant. emergencies. NFPA recommends replacement after 10 years.
The new units will be equipped with tracker technology to help
locate trapped firefighters,
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
280
280
280
280
280
280
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
B-11
B-12
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Fire
PROJECT TITLE: SCBA Replacement
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $280__________________
Approved
No _ _
$_____________
Need remains, SCBA needs replacement and upgrade.
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
State contract pricing.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No X__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Existing Air Packs are 10 years old. Maintenance and repairs have increased. NFPA is recommending replacement after 10 years. New packs will
have technology to allow Commander to track movement/location of Firefighters in a fire.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Repair costs increase. We presently cannot track pack wearers location at a fire. This technology did not exist when existing units were purchased.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Fire Station
PROJECT LIFE: 50 years
SCHEDULED START: 2018
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2019
RANKING: 7
_X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Build new Station 6 or combine existing Station 4 (Westport Repeated evaluations of the Fire Protection for the Northeast
Avenue). Station to improve Fire protection in the Northeast quadrant of the city indicate long response time and longer 2qnd
quadrant of the City including Cranbury neighborhood.
due (backup) response. Option 1 is to build a new Station 6.
Option 2 is to relocate the existing Station 4 or relocate additional
staffing into a renovated Station 4. These options will address
this deficiency. A targeted study will be completed in 15/16 to
advise and inform this project decision.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
3,000
3,000
3,000
3,000
3,000
3,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
B-13
B-14
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Fire
PROJECT TITLE: Fire Station
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $1,000,000_______________
Approved
No _ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Previous bids.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ X__
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
No. of new positions __________________
________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Several internal and external studies have identified the need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
If the study recommends a new station, 16 new personnel will need to be hired. A relocated or renovated Station 4 will only incur construction
Costs without increasing personnel costs.
Department of Public Works
Five Year Capital Budget Requirements Forecast
FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16
Priority Approved Requested FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20
A BUILDING
City Hall Repairs/Improvements
MANAGEMENT Capital repairs,Replacements & Improvements
Nathaniel Ely Repairs/Improvements
Public Works Center Repairs/Improvements
Energy Conservation - Various Buildings
Police HQ Repairs/Improvements
Lockwood House
Ben Franklin Repairs/Improvements
Main Library
Life safety - various buildings
Environmental Remediation Various Buildings
B BRIDGES
Perry Avenue bridge over Norwalk River
Glover Avenue Bridge improvements
Perry Avenue bridge over Silvermine (pointing)
James Street Bridge over Silvermine
General Bridge Repairs
East Avenue Roadway and Bridge
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
730,000
50,000
145,000
105,000
25,000
20,000
30,000
77,000
100,000
20,000
1,302,000
190,000
914,000
50,000
160,000
218,000
50,000
49,000
80,000
48,000
42,000
15,000
530,000
50,000
35,000
250,000
25,000
265,000
50,000
750,000
300,000
50,000
203,000
50,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
165,000
535,000
165,000
105,000
167,000
16,000
1,626,000
20,000
1,610,000
20,000
1,380,000
20,000
578,000
296,000
250,000
30,000
1,000,000
300,000
65,000
190,000
576,000
Vehicles/equipment
1
805,000
770,000
790,000
D MAPPING
Drainage System mapping
1
0
60,000
60,000
E PAVEMENT
PROGRAMS
Pavement Management
City Hall parking facilities
Norwalk River Valley Trail
Washington Street
1
2
3
4
5,000,000
F SIDEWALK
Sidewalks and Curbing - Road Paving
Sidewalks and Curbing - Citywide
Footpath Replacement
Sidewalks - City buildings/property
1
2
3
4
200,000
5,200,000
500,000
500,000
G STORM
WATER
General Drainage
Honeysuckle-Daphne Diversion
Watercourse Maintenance
Stormwater Quality Management (MS4)
Water Street outlet maintenance
Keeler Brook Drainage Area
Culvert rehabilitation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
250,000
250,000
H TRAFFIC
Traffic Signals at Various Locations
Striping and signing (incl bike lanes)
Incident Management System
Transportation Management Plan
1
2
3
4
I TREES
Tree Planting - General
1
J SAFETEALU
MATCH
FHWA Matching Funds
Safe Routes to Schools
1
2
200,000
200,000
50,000
0
K OTHER
Transfer station - compactor replacements
Transfer station repairs
1
2
276,000
276,000
TOTALS
G:\EXCEL\CAPBUD\FY 15-16\5 Yr Cap Bud Summary 2016-20 Submittal.xls
65,000
1,365,000
C FLEET
20,000
298,000
0
966,000
65,000
883,000
60,000
60,000
6,000,000
6,000,000
0
440,000
60,000
6,000,000
250,000
750,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
6,000,000
6,000,000
7,500,000
500,000
1,000,000
100,000
28,000
1,628,000
500,000
1,000,000
100,000
500,000
1,000,000
100,000
50,000
1,650,000
500,000
1,000,000
100,000
1,600,000
500,000
1,000,000
100,000
50,000
1,650,000
500,000
350,000
1,500,000
500,000
500,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
200,000
300,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
1,000,000
200,000
1,000,000
200,000
300,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,600,000
2,850,000
3,000,000
250,000
300,000
250,000
250,000
4,000,000
400,000
6,100,000
750,000
1,320,000
2,320,000
250,000
200,000
750,000
1,800,000
3,000,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
0
250,000
200,000
450,000
800,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
500,000
250,000
100,000
500,000
850,000
200,000
100,000
500,000
800,000
60,000
60,000
250,000
0
250,000
0
140,000
140,000
-
-
-
8,773,000 15,510,000 17,255,000 19,216,000 14,346,000
11,308,000
1/30/20152:11 PM
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Repairs and Improvements
PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years
SCHEDULED START: Various
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
RANKING:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
A-1
DESCRIPTION:
A.
Security Notification System ($156,000)
B.
Sand Filter Installation for air conditioning system ($20,000)
C.
Roof replacement including the copper on the atrium dome,
flashings and masonry repairs ($1,060,000)
FY 2015 – 16 $530,000
FY 2016 – 17 $530,000
Improvements to Community Room ($208,000)
Including Sound/ IT system installation with ADA Compliance,
replacing existing lighting, restore library book display cabinets,
refinish existing woodwork, update of kitchen facilities
D.
E.
F.
Concert Hall repairs to ceiling and painting ($265,000)
Interior upgrade ($300,000)
G.
Interior Painting Plan ($203,000)
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
JUSTIFICATION:
A.
Currently City Hall does not have a building wide notification system to alert occupants of any threats (active shooter, bomb threat, etc.) The office of
emergency management is currently reviewing systems with the capabilities of using integrated communications through office desktop computers, phones
and cell phones. This number also includes an estimate to update notification systems in the Health Department.
B.
During a recent manufacturer’s inspection and service of the buildings air conditioning chillers, it was recommended that a sand filter be installed on the
condensing water loop supporting the chillers. The sand filter is designed to filter damage causing particulates from the water entering the system.
C.
The roof, parapet walls, chimney and atrium copper dome were installed in 1986 and have an estimated life of 20 – 25 years. The roof is beginning to show
signs of deterioration and leaks and has exceeded its estimated life cycle period. This project could be performed in three phases to reduce fiscal impact to
the City. $530,000 was approved in the 2014 – 15 fiscal year Capital Budget request.
D.
City Hall Community Room is a multipurpose facility that has served the public and City Hall functions extensively through the years. The Community Room
was renovated in 1987 as part of the City Hall renovation project. This was formerly the Norwalk High School Library. Although the basic character of the
room was preserved, some features were removed and should be properly replaced, such as the original light fixtures and book cabinets. In addition, a
proper PA system and IT access is essential in meeting the needs of various events that occupy the space, as well as meeting ADA requirements. In regard
to the kitchen area, upgrade of the kitchen facility equipment is required.
E.
Norwalk Concert Hall requires repairs to walls, ceilings and painting as a result of age and damage caused by several roof leaks.
F.
Building interior finishes and equipment such as but not limited to; door hardware, ceiling and floor tiles, wallpaper, and other interior finishes require
replacement as they are over 25 years old are beyond repair.
G.
Funding is required to begin a five year painting program to included but not limited to offices, restrooms, hallways, doors and trim, wallpaper etc. Building
Management will survey offices and common areas to determine a priority sequence based upon existing condition.
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
143
8
151
2,221
906
530
265
300
203
4,425
2,364
914
530
265
300
203
4,576
2,364
914
530
265
300
203
4,576
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C1-
-C22015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Repairs & Improvements
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020
1.
A
156
0
0
0
0
B
20
0
0
0
0
C
530
530
0
0
0
D
208
0
0
0
0
E
0
0
265
0
0
F
0
0
0
300
0
G
TOTAL
0
914
0
530
0
265
0
300
TOTAL
203
203
2,212
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes X_
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
Ongoing_____
Approved
__$730,000___
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor Estimates
3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
No _ _
Security: Currently City Hall does not have a building wide mass communications notification system to alert occupants of any threats. A building wide security system is supported
and recommended by the City Hall Emergency Planning Team.
Roof: The roof has reached its life cycle. The roof is beginning to show significant signs of deterioration and Building Management is experiencing leaks in areas such as the atrium,
Planning & Zoning office and the Concert Hall.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Security: Without a mass communications system in place the potential for greater consequences during a threat exists. Roof: The roof is showing signs of deterioration and leaks
that penetrate into the building and will cause interior damage to ceilings, walls, office equipment etc.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management TITLE: Various City Bldgs. –Capital Replacements,
Repairs & Improvements
PROJECT LIFE: Various
SCHEDULED START: Various
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
RANKING: A-2
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Capital replacements and repairs to
infrastructure at City buildings
Most buildings under Building Management are within a range of 20 – 70 years old and require
replacement and repair of major building components often without notice. As buildings are aging,
unplanned capital replacements and repairs of mechanical equipment are necessary. The following
are examples of unexpected replacement projects that were completed:
• City Hall – Air Handler Major Component Replacement
• City Hall – Elevators Door Operator Replacement
Approval of this capital request will help to prolong major equipment and structural replacements.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
200
50
50
50
50
50
450
200
50
50
50
50
50
450
200
50
50
50
50
50
450
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C3-
-C4-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Various City Bldgs. – Capital
Replacements, Repairs & Improvements
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
A
TOTAL
2015-2016 2016-2017
50
50
50
50
2017-2018
50
50
2018-2019
50
50
TOTAL
2019 - 2020
50
50
250
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes___X__
No _
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
Ongoing______
Approved
___$50,000
__
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor and Engineering estimates
3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No X _
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions ________________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Due to the age of the buildings ranging from 20 – 70 years, this project is necessary to provide replacement of any unforeseen failure of mechanical
heating and air conditioning equipment and/ or interior and exterior infrastructure at City buildings under Building Management.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Basic infrastructure and building systems which support heating, air conditioning etc. could be significantly impacted and depending on the severity
could lead to building closure.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT LIFE: Various
SCHEDULED START: Various
RANKING: A-3
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: Nathaniel Ely
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
A. Design and Replacement of eighty-three (83)
windows and frames in rear of building FY
2015-16 ($160,000)
JUSTIFICATION:
A. The single pane windows at the rear of the building are original to the building (1955). They show signs of wear,
safety concerns, and are not energy efficient. Based on the test results, the window caulking, and glazing have
been classified as “Asbestos Containing Material”. The cost of this project includes design services, abatement,
removal and installation of new windows and frames. This project could be performed in two phases to reduce
budgetary impact to the City. Energy efficiency rebates will be pursued for this project. $145,000 was approved
in the fiscal year 2014 -15 Capital Budget Request.
B.
Engineering assessment & design services for
boiler replacement ($35,000)
B. Building Management is requesting funds for engineering assessment and design services for the replacement
of existing steam boilers to Hydronic boilers and the conversion of the heating distribution system to a Hydronic
system.
C.
Boiler Replacement and steam to hot water
conversion ($750,000)
C. The steam heat distribution system is original to the building and is no longer effective in providing balanced
heat within the building. The existing boilers will be replaced with new energy efficient boilers. Energy efficiency
rebates will be pursued for this project.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-2016
2016-2017
44
2017-2018
35
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
79
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
252
160
296
160
296
160
750
1,162
35
750
1,241
35
750
1,241
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C5-
-C6-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Nathaniel Ely
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
1.
2.
3.
4.
A
B
C
TOTAL
20152016
160
0
0
160
2016-2017
0
35
0
35
2017-2018
0
0
750
750
2018-2019
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
2019 - 2020
0
0
0
0
945
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes X_
No __
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
Ongoing______
Approved
__$145,000_____
If not, why is the project now included?
How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor Estimates
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions ________________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Inoperable and broken windows could pose a safety hazard to children in the area. The existing 83 single pane windows are original to the building
and require replacement as they are not energy efficient.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Potential safety hazard could exist, and the building will not achieve improved operating and energy efficiency.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management TITLE: Public Works Center Repairs & Improvements
PROJECT LIFE: Various
SCHEDULED START: Various
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
RANKING:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
A-4
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
A. Upgrade controls on heating units 1 through 5 in the DPW
Garage Area ($28,000)
B. Replace Obsolete Fire Panels($25,000)
C. Salt Shed Repairs ($50,000)
D. Vehicle Fuel Storage Tank Replacements ($250,000)
E. Security Camera Replacement ($115,00)
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
The heating units for the garage areas at the Public Works Center are not equipped with controls tied into the Building
Management System (BMS). Units operate at full capacity and operate 24/7 during the winter months. Controls would reduce
energy costs, extend equipment life, and provide freeze protection for the existing fire sprinkler system.
At the Public Works Center there are two fire panels one serving the Administration Building and one servicing the Dispatch
Building. The fire panels are over 25 years old and are in need of repair frequently. The panel that serves the Dispatch Building is
no longer being supported by the manufacture and replacement parts are difficult to acquire. Replacement of the fire panels is
essential as it provides life safety communication for the buildings and a quick response time from the fire department.
Repairs to the concrete foundation wall at the salt Shed are required to maintain the integrity of the structure. Concrete
deterioration has exposed steel reinforcement (rebar). The poor concrete will be cut and chipped out and rebar replaced as
needed. Concrete patch will be placed and the wall coated with salt resistant material.
The vehicle fuel storage tanks require replacement. The containment vessels are leaking and the tanks are scheduled for
replacement.
The current security system is at the end of its life span and needs to be replaced. New system will be incorporated in City-wide
camera system.
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
20
3
23
1,037
215
250
1,502
1,057
218
250
1,525
1,057
218
250
1,525
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C7-
-C8-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Public Works Center Repairs & Improvements
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
PROJECT
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020
1.
3.
4.
5.
A
B
C
D
28
25
50
E
115
Total
218
0
0
0
0
250
250
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
468
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes X_
No __
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
Ongoing______
Approved
___$ 105,000
___
If not, why is the project now included?
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Consulting Engineers Estimates
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No X _
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions ________________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Existing controls are pneumatic and are not integrated into the Building Management System (BMS). Replacement of control equipment
will provide complete control of fan coils units (5) in truck garage area and would potentially reduce energy cost.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Pneumatic controls are reaching their end of life cycle and could fail which without notice leaving truck garage area without sufficient heat.
If this project is deferred or not funded, energy efficiency will not be achieved and heating efficiency will be lost.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT LIFE: Various
TITLE: Various Buildings – Energy Conservation
SCHEDULED START: Various
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: A-5
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Implementation of ongoing building energy
conservation projects and equipment for city
buildings with a favorable rate of return on
investment
This initiative is in response to continued energy conservation and operating cost reductions at
various City buildings. Proposed projects would include, but not be limited to lighting, off-hour
temperature control, installation of controls for schedule optimization and energy program upgrades
etc. The proposed funding would be used to supplement local utility conservation incentives,
consulting services and development.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
10
TOTAL
10
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
195
50
25
25
25
25
345
205
50
25
25
25
25
355
205
50
25
25
25
25
355
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C9-
C10-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Various Buildings – Energy Conservation
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
1.
2.
3.
4.
A
2015-2016
50
2016-2017
25
2017-2018
25
TOTAL
50
25
25
2018-2019
25
25
TOTAL
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request Ongoing_
If not, why is the project now included?
25
150
Approved
Yes _X__
No __
_$ ____25,000___
How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor Estimate
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions ___________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Rising energy costs. Enhance energy Conservation.
5.
2019 - 2020
25
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
A portion of rising energy costs would not be offset if this were deferred.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT LIFE: Various
RANKING: A-6
DESCRIPTION:
Front
entry
($49,000)
retaining
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Police Headquarters
SCHEDULED START: Various
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
walls/planters The planter retaining walls in the entry plaza are showing signs of deterioration. This is
visually observed by stress cracks, scaling, and water penetration, thereby requiring
replacement.
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
139
49
188
139
49
188
139
49
188
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C11-
-C12-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Police Headquarters
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
1.
2.
3.
4.
A
B
C
TOTAL
2015-2016
49
0
0
49
2016-2017
0
0
0
0
2017-2018
0
0
0
0
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
If not, why is the project now included?
2018-2019
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
Ongoing ______
2019 - 2020
0
0
0
0
49
Approved
Yes X_
No _
__$20,000_________
How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor’s Estimate
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No X _
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions ________________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The existing retaining wall shows signs of deterioration (broken, flaked, or pitted surface). During the winter season he freeze/thaw cycle
creates stress cracks which appear along the retaining wall.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
As time moves forward, conditions will worsen during each winter season.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT TITLE:
PROJECT LIFE:
Lockwood House – Repairs and Improvements
SCHEDULED START:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: A-7
DESCRIPTION:
___ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement of 36 fan coil units and There are 36 fan coil units which supply heating and cooling to the rooms within the
associated components such as air building. The units are over 38 years old; beginning to fail and have gone well beyond
compressor, thermostats and controls
their life cycle.
In April of 2014, the City’s Purchasing Department advertised the replacement of the fan
coils for bid. The result of the lowest responsible bid was approximately $80,000 over
the estimate for the project. Building Management is requesting the additional funds in
the fiscal year 2015 – 16 capital plan to initiate this project.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-2016
2016-2017
2
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
2
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
116
80
196
118
80
198
118
80
198
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C13-
-C14-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT TITLE: Lockwood House
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
1.
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019 - 2020
201516
80
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
80
0
0
0
TOTAL
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $______
0
80
Yes ___
No _X _
Approved ________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor Estimates
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No X__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Additional funding would be required for this project to include the cost of equipment and carpentry work to construct enclosures for the fan coil units.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Existing fan coil units could fail and providing heat and air conditioning in various rooms within the building could be hampered.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Ben Franklin
PROJECT LIFE: Various
SCHEDULED START: Various
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
RANKING: A-8
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
DESCRIPTION:
A. Replacement and repair of windows ($48,000)
A. A large portion of the existing windows do not fit securely within their frames, are out of alignment and
are missing hardware parts. Full replacement and / or repair will add longevity to the operations of the
windows.
B. Roof replacement($330,000)
FY2016-17 ($165,000)
FY2017-18 ($165,000)
B. The existing EPDM roof was installed in 1991 and is approaching its life cycle. The roof has undergone
several phases of repairs; most recently a project was completed in the summer of 2008 that entailed
repair of all roof seams which extended the life of the roof. The roof will be replaced with an energy
efficient membrane roof.
C. Replacement of thirty-eight (38) fan coil units
($167,000)
C.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
Engineering/Design
The fan coil units and associated piping supporting heating and air conditioning are approximately twenty
years old and require replacement.
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
15
15
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
222
48
165
165
167
767
237
48
165
165
167
782
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
237
48
165
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C15-
165
167
782
-C16-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Ben Franklin
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
1.
2.
3.
4.
2015-2016
A
48
B
0
C
0
D
0
E
0
TOTAL
48
2016-2017
0
165
0
0
0
165
2017-2018
0
0
165
0
0
165
2018-2019
0
0
0
167
0
167
TOTAL
2019 - 2020
0
0
0
0
0
0
545
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes X _
No __
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
Ongoing ____
Approved
_____$77,000______
If not, why is the project now included?
How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor Estimate
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions ________________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Approximately 76 windows are no longer sitting securely within their frames; are out of alignment and/ or missing hardware. These conditions also
present a safety concern when windows are opened and closed.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Safety concerns when operating windows.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Library
CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Main Library Repairs & Improvements
PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years
SCHEDULED START: Various
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
RANKING: A-9
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
A. Main Library building preservation of exterior wood façade
and replacement of two (2) exterior light fixtures ($42,000)
JUSTIFICATION:
A. The wood façade on the building is showing signs of rotting and is in need of replacement. One exterior flood light has fallen from its
mounting on the wood due to this condition.
B.
A building study for the Main Library was completed by an engineering firm in 2013. The recommendations from the engineering report
indicate; new gas fired boilers and a conversion from steam to hot water heat. In addition to replacing the boilers, the 6,000 gallon oil tank
will be removed; electronic controls installed; pumps, motors, fans and cabinet heaters replaced. Building Management is requesting
funds for the engineering, design and plan of action for replacing the various systems.
C.
Replacement of the oil/ steam heating with a natural gas and hydronic system including condensing water pumps, domestic hot water
heater. This project will include the installation of building management system (BMS) to better control the heating and cooling in the
building. Currently the Main Library has limited control on the air conditioning and heating system due to antiquated and malfunctioning
controls. This project can be performed over the course of two years to reduce the budgetary impact to the City.
D.
The entranceway and the sidewalk along Mott Avenue leading to the parking lot are dark all winter when the library is open until 8:30pm.
The flood lighting along the Belden Avenue side of the building will show the City’s commitment to the Wall Street area redevelopment.
This project will include the addition of energy efficient security lighting along the Mott Avenue sidewalk.
B. Mechanical HVAC system modifications engineering and
design
($35,000)
C. Mechanical HVAC system replacement and upgrade
($605,000)
2015 – 2016 ($500,000)
2016 – 2017 ($105,000)
D. Exterior Lighting Upgrade ($16,000)
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
Engineering/Design
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
3
35
38
100
39
500
105
16
760
100
42
535
105
16
798
100
42
535
105
16
798
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C17-
-C18-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Library
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Main Library Repairs & Improvements
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
1.
2.
A
B
C
2015-2016
42
0
0
2016-2017
0
535
0
2017-2018
0
0
105
D
TOTAL
0
42
0
535
0
105
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
If not, why is the project now included?
How was your cost estimate derived?
2018-2019
0
0
0
16
16
TOTAL
Ongoing_____
2019 - 2020
0
0
0
0
0
698
Approved
Yes X_
__$100,000___
No _ _
Contractor Estimates
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
No X_
Rotted and damaged exterior wood will continue to deteriorate causing additional damage to the exterior of the building.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Eventually, due to the damaged and rotted wood the likelihood of water penetration into the building could cause interior damage to ceilings,
walls and furnishings.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Various Bldgs – Life Safety
PROJECT LIFE:
SCHEDULED START: Various
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Various
RANKING: A-10
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIP.
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replace and/or install life safety equipment Periodically life safety equipment must be replaced due to failures and changes in
such as emergency exit lights, emergency local state codes.
lighting and emergency egress door hardware
at various City buildings.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
15
15
15
15
15
15
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C19-
-C20-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Various Bldgs – Life Safety
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
1.
2.
3.
4.
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019 - 2020
201516
15
0
0
TOTAL
15
0
0
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
If not, why is the project now included?
Result of local and State inspections.
0
0
TOTAL
Ongoing_____
0
0
15
Approved
Yes __
______
How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor Estimates
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Compliance with local and State inspections.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Local and State inspection recommendations would not be in compliance.
No _X _
No X_
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management PROJECT TITLE: Various Buildings - Environmental
Remediation
PROJECT LIFE: Permanent
SCHEDULED START: Ongoing
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: A-11
DESCRIPTION:
Ongoing
environmental
remediation.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
__X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
testing
and
PRIOR
YEARS
In the past funds were allocated for environmental remediation of asbestos, lead paint and other
hazardous materials present in older City buildings. Most of the accessible friable asbestos
material has been removed from City buildings. However, in order to make repairs and
replacements of existing piping and equipment, access to floor and wall areas is necessary.
Prior to the commencement of repair work in such areas, testing Is required and if positive,
abatement must take place for environmental safety. The purpose of this would be to remove
non-friable asbestos material from buildings as required. In addition, the EPA has enacted new
remediation requirements for polychlorinated biphenyls which are present in caulking in old
buildings. These funds will help to address PCB problems when encountered.
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
10
TOTAL
10
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
103
20
20
20
20
183
113
20
20
20
20
193
113
20
20
20
20
193
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C21-
-C22-
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Building Management
PROJECT TITLE: Various Buildings - Environmental
Remediation
PROJECT
PROJECT COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
1.
2.
3.
4.
TOTAL
2015-2016
0
2016-2017
20
2017-2018
20
0
20
20
2018-2019
20
20
TOTAL
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request
If not, why is the project now included?
2019 - 2020
20
20
80
Ongoing_______
Yes _X_
No __
Approved
$20,000___
How was your cost estimate derived?
Environmental Contractor Estimate
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ____
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions ___________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
This request will address any unforeseen environmental concerns while maintenance and repair work is performed.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Should this project be deferred and maintenance repair work is required; repair costs could be quadrupled.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Bridges
PROJECT LIFE: 50 YEARS
SCHEDULED START: 2014
DESCRIPTION:
Replace deteriorated bridge superstructure and Increase
width of travelway between RR crossing and Main
Avenue to add a dedicated left turn lane onto Main
Avenue.
Total
$ 370,420
$74,084
Design (Non-Participating)
$ 24,500
$24,500
Construction (Participating)
$3,746,540
$749,318
Construction (Non-Participating)
$ 546,792
$546,792
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
2015-16
210
City Share@ 20% (For participating)
Design (Participating)
R.O.W.
PRIOR
YEARS
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION: Federal Local Bridge Program (80%) Funded is going to provide a width of three lanes of bridge over
the Norwalk River in order to maintain two lanes of traffic during construction. Due to the location of the CVS
entrance/exit, The Metro North Railroad Crossing and the location of Main Avenue, insufficient room to queue traffic
exists, causing a severely hazardous condition. This project will allow the City to increase the width of the travelway on
Perry Avenue to add a third lane between the RR crossing and Main Avenue.
Project Costs
Engineering/Design
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: B-1
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PROJECT TITLE: Perry Avenue Bridge over Norwalk River
$ 175,000
$ 35,000
$4,863,310
$1,429,694
2016-17
2017-18
2
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
212
74
74
850
294
1,144
1,134
296
1,430
1,134
296
1,430
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C23-
-C24-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Bridges
PROJECT TITLE: Perry Avenue Bridge over Norwalk River
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Request $__190____
Yes
Approved
x
No
_$_190_____
Engineers Estimate
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No _X _
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The current superstructure of the Perry Avenue Bridge is in poor condition. This project will replace the superstructure and provide the
opportunity to correct the present condition at the RR Crossing which presents an extremely hazardous condition for traffic queuing at both Main
Avenue and the Crossing signal. This project will allow for additional room to queue traffic, therefore promoting safety for the traveling public,
as well as, rehabilitating of the Bridge.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
This project is 80% State and Federal Funded, and is scheduled for advertisement for Bid in Spring 2014. The additional funds are required to
provide the cities 20% share.
2015 - 16
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY : Bridges
PROJECT TITLE: Glover Avenue Bridge Improvements
PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years
SCHEDULED START: July 2011
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: B-2
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Design and Construction for the removal of inadequate
existing bridge railings and installation of new railings
meeting current AASHTO/DOT requirements,
widening of the bridge deck to provide 3 travel lanes
and install a separate 8’wide pedestrian bridge.
Previous funding provided for replacement bridge railings. The current project will include the new railings,
repair of the stone masonry arch and a pedestrian sidewalk bridge in order to properly maintain the structure,
provide safe passage for pedestrians and provide three lanes of traffic for Glover Avenue at Main Avenue.
The current two lane roadway is inadequate for traffic generated by the residential and commercial
development in the area. The entire Glover Avenue Bridge was to be replaced by the new Route 7, Main
Avenue, and Super 7 interchange. That project was terminated.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
Engineering/Design
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
250
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
250
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
120
1,000
1,120
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
120
250
1,000
1,370
120
250
1,000
1,370
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C25-
-C26-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Bridges
PROJECT TITLE: Glover Avenue Bridge Improvements
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $_120 ____
Yes
X
No ____
Approved $_120____
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Engineers Estimate
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No _X _
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Existing railings presents a safety concern for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic using Glover Avenue.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Potential liability for City of Norwalk when a vehicle crashes through existing deficient rails and falls into the river with potential fatalities.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT LIFE: 50 Years
CATEGORY : Bridges PROJECT TITLE: Perry Avenue Bridge over Silvermine
SCHEDULED START: Current 2015
RANKING: B-3
___ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Repoint underside of existing stone arch bridge
Recent state bridge inspections indicated the underside of the Perry Avenue Stone Arch
Bridge needs repointing. This work was not performed when the roadway improvements and
bridge railings were installed in 2006. The work proposed will provide continued
serviceability of this historic structure.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
30
300
330
30
300
330
30
300
330
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C27-
-C28-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Public Works
1.
CATEGORY:
Bridge
PROJECT TITLE: Perry Avenue Bridge over Silvermine
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $____
Yes
Approved
X
No ___
$ _____
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Engineers Estimate
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
_____________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No __X _
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
If this project does not move forward, with the increasing deterioration taking place on this bridge, there exists a potential for lowering of the
load rating of the bridge and potential for closing of the roadway.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY : Bridges
PROJECT TITLE: James Street Bridge Silvermine
PROJECT LIFE: 50 Years
SCHEDULED START: Current
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2018
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: B-4
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Final design effort for superstructure
replacement of James Street Bridge over
Silvermine River, R.O.W. Costs, construction,
construction administration, and inspection of
construction
The existing James Street Bridge was constructed in 1956 and is in a deteriorated condition. The
new superstructure will be replaced to the same approximate dimensions, with a more aesthetically
appealing railing system. This project will be funded at 80% Federal funding through the Federal
Local Bridge Program. 20% of the overall cost is the City responsibility.
Projected Costs
Total
City Share @ 20%
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.
Design (Participating)
$ 226,000
$ 45,200
Construction (Participating)
$1,950,000
$350,000
R.O.W.
$ 300,000
$ 60,000
$2,476,000
$455,200
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-2020
TOTAL
100
100
60
60
295
295
455
455
455
455
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C29-
-C30-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Bridges
PROJECT TITLE: James Street Bridge Silvermine
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $195_ ____
Yes
Approved $_195__
X
No __ _
_____
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Engineers Estimate
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No _X_ _
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
If project does not move forward, with increasing deterioration taking place, potential exists for lowering of the load rating for this bridge and
eventually even the possibility for closure of the roadway.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Bridges
PROJECT LIFE: 40- 50 years
SCHEDULED START: JULY 2010
PROJECT TITLE:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: B-5
General Bridge Repairs
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 7/2015
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
General bridge repairs to existing bridges
including bridge railing repairs, concrete patch
repairs, pointing of masonry, approach railing
repairs and other miscellaneous repairs as needed.
Funds also required to inspect city structures with
spans less than 20 feet.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
The State of Connecticut, every two years, inspects all City Bridges with a span greater than 20 feet.
Deficiencies are brought to the attention of the City following these inspections. These deficiencies must be
repaired to allow for safe transport of vehicles and pedestrians. Example: West Cedar Street Bridge needs to
have pointing work done on old masonry arch section as well as improving of scour countermeasures. Other
work would include painting of metal railings such as those located at Klondike Park.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-15
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
65
65
65
195
65
65
65
195
65
65
65
195
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C31-
-C32-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Bridges
PROJECT TITLE: General Bridge Repairs
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $_65,000_
Yes _X
_ ____
Approved
No _ _
_$_65,000___
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate of past expenditures
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Improved safety for traveling public and promotes increased useful life of structures.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Potential for increased liability for City since State of Connecticut has identified deficiencies.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.
Yes ___
No _ X_
No. of new positions ____________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Bridges
PROJECT TITLE: East Avenue Roadway / Bridge
PROJECT LIFE: 50 Years
SCHEDULED START: JULY 2009
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: B-6
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: JULY 2018
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Widening of East Avenue from St. John Street to
Rowan St. to accommodate 4 lanes of traffic. This
project will also add sidewalks to both sides of the
roadway below the bridge for improved safety for
pedestrians as well as increasing vertical clearance
below the bridge.
The low vertical clearance and narrow width of the roadway below the East Avenue RR Bridge causes
significant traffic delays on East avenue as well as increased potential for vehicular and pedestrian
collisions. Presently truck traffic can not pass below the bridge causing trucks to take Fort Point St. as a
route to south of the bridge. Turning traffic onto Fort Point also causes significant traffic impacts to East
Avenue Traffic that need to be eliminated for improved safety in this corridor. The City will pay 100% Cost
of Design Effort, 10% of R.O.W. costs. Federal and State will pay remainder of R.O.W. costs and 100%
Construction Costs.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
Projected Costs
Design Costs
R.O.W.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
Totals
$ 433,000
$2,000,000
$2,433,000
2016-17
2017-18
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C33-
City Obligation
$433000
$200,000
$633,000
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
-C34-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Bridges
PROJECT TITLE: East Avenue Roadway / Bridge
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $_0_
Yes ___
_ ____
Approved
No _X _
_$ 0__
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Updated Engineers Estimate
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No _X _
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Will improve traffic flow and safety for both pedestrians and vehicles with this corridor. Project to be ready for bidding with State Bridge
Projects and City will be able to take advantage of Federal and State funding for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT TITLE: Fleet Replacement
PROJECT LIFE: Ongoing
SCHEDULED START:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
RANKING: C1
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION: (See attached Fleet Replacement
Plan)
• Dump truck/snow plow (2)
• Wood chipper, bandit
• Ford F-550 dump truck
• Trackless multi-use vehicle
• Ford F-350 flatbed truck
• Drainage investigation system attachments
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
JUSTIFICATION:
•
•
•
•
•
•
On-going replacement/rotation of snow plow trucks to maximize productivity and to minimize costs.
Replace a small, aging, under-powered, inefficient chipper; standardizing the chipper fleet
Replace a broken asphalt repair truck that is already out of service
Needed for more efficient sidewalk maintenance, particularly snow and ice removal
Replace an old, inefficient general purpose truck that must be taken out of service
Needed to allow crawl camera to operate efficiently in broken, collapsed and flowing pipes
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Ongoing
770
790
966
883
440
3,849
Ongoing
770
790
966
883
440
3,849
Ongoing
770
790
966
883
440
3,849
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C35-
-C36-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Public Works
1.
PROJECT TITLE Fleet Replacement
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes X
Request $____830,000_______
2.
How was your cost estimate derived? Bids and quotations from equipment suppliers.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Approved
No ___
_$805,000____
Yes _X__
No __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
__ ____________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
__________________
D. Additional operating expenses
__________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions ___________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Equipment replacement is needed to maintain City services for snow and ice removal, highway and drainage repairs, and tree
management. See Justification section on Page 1.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.
Increased maintenance costs, loss of productivity, dilution of City services, and increased liability associated with an aging fleet.
Department of Public Works
Fleet Replacment and Production Efficiency Plan
FY 2014-2015 Approved
FY 2015-2016
FY 2016-2017
FY 2017-2018
FY 2018-2019
FY 2019-2020
Equipment Description Num Amount
Total
Num Amount
Total
Num Amount
Total
Num Amount
Total
Num Amount
Total
Num Amount
Total
Dump truck 37,000 lb
GVW snow/ice app
2 $ 220,000 $ 440,000 2 $220,000 $ 440,000 2 $ 220,000 $ 440,000 2 $ 220,000 $ 440,000 2 $ 220,000 $ 440,000 2 $ 220,000 $ 440,000
1
$ 75,000
$
75,000
Ford F-550 dump truck
1
$
$
45,000
Trackless multi-use
vehicle
1
$145,000
$ 145,000
Ford F-350 flatbed truck
1
$ 40,000
$
40,000
Drainage investigation
system attachments
1
$ 25,000
$
25,000
Wood chipper, Bandit
1
$
75,000
$
75,000
45,000
1
$
45,000
$
45,000
1
$
48,000
$
48,000
Ford F-750 rack body
truck
1
$
90,000
$
90,000
Mack GU713 10-wheeler
1
$ 165,000
$
165,000
1
$ 138,000
$
138,000
1
$
30,000
$
30,000
Small packer
1
$ 125,000
$
125,000
Street sweeper, Elgin
Pelican P
1
$ 185,000
$
185,000
Midsize truck, Ford F750/plow
1
$ 138,000
$
138,000
Bucket loader
1
$ 185,000
$
185,000
Enclosed storm
drainage camera truck
1
$ 120,000
$
120,000
$
883,000
Pickup Ford F250
1
$
25,000
$
25,000
Survey vehicle
1
$
25,000
$
25,000
Traffic measurement
vehicle
1
$
25,000
$
25,000
Mower unit, tractor
mount
GPS replacement
Water truck chassis,
Mack GU712
2
$
35,000
$
70,000
1
$
75,000
$
75,000
1
$ 120,000
$
120,000
$
805,000
$
770,000
$
790,000
$
966,000
$
440,000
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Mapping
PROJECT LIFE: 5 years
PROJECT TITLE: Drainage System Mapping
SCHEDULED START: 2012
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
x NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: D-1
_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
This project is for completion of the storm drainage
mapping as being required under the new MS-4
permitting. This information will be added to the City’s
GIS system and available for departmental needs like
asset management, storm
water mapping,
emergency preparedness, etc.
The Department is tasked with maintaining much of the City’s infrastructure including stormwater drainage.
Knowledge of the location and condition of our infrastructure is critical in addressing emergencies such as oil
spills or creating and developing infrastructure maintenance and replacement plans. Currently, the City’s
records of these assets are incomplete and the digital inventory is the most expedient and least costly method
of accurately obtaining the necessary data. Mapping of the storm drainage system is also required under
MS-4 permit requirements.
This information will also be used to offset the cost of survey work required for other capital
projects.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
250
60
60
60
60
60
550
250
60
60
60
60
60
550
250
60
60
60
60
60
550
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equip./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify) - Sales
COST REDUCTIONS
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C37-
-C38-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: MAPPING
PROJECT TITLE: Drainage System Mapping
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request
$ 250 _____
Approved
2.
How was your cost estimate derived? 2 interns at $14/hr for a total of 4000 hr/year $56,000
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _x_
No __
Yes __x_
No _
$ 0__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
_____
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
____
C. Additional Salary Costs
_________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
___
________
No. of new positions ___________________
_Payback within 4 years in increased efficiencies
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Ability to reduce the need for survey on capital budget projects, increase efficiency, provides accurate representation of city during
emergencies, etc.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The City has made a significant investment in its existing mapping. Without continued funding, the accuracy and effectiveness of the GIS
deteriorates to a point where its value to the City is significantly decreased.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Management Program
PROJECT LIFE: 20+ Years
SCHEDULED START: ONGOING
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: ONGOING
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: E-1
DESCRIPTION:
The Pavement Management program is intended
to begin improving the condition of streets and
roads throughout the City, as measured by the
average Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
Engineering/Design
Ongoing
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
At recent funding levels, the average PCI of streets and roads in the City has begun to stabilize. Analysis shows
that an annual investment of $6 million is required to begin increasing, and sustaining, the average PCI across
the City. At lower funding levels, the average PCI will decline. Maintaining the current average PCI is not
sufficient to correct many streets that are in extremely poor condition. DPW recommends an annual budget of
$6M per year, not only to maintain the average PCI, but to improve the condition of some of worst condition
streets in Norwalk.
In the 2014 Pavement Management Program over $1,000,000 was spent on replacement sidewalk construction
and ADA compliance for Handicap Access Ramps to sidewalks. SIDEWALK CATEGORY REQUEST has
been increased to $500,000.
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
300
300
300
300
300
1,500
5,250
5,250
5,250
5,250
5,250
26,250
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
Ongoing
450
450
450
450
450
2,250
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Ongoing
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
30,000
Ongoing
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
30,000
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C39-
-C40DEPARTMENT: Public Works
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
CATEGORY: Pavement Programs
PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Management Program
Paving Management Program
_______FY 2015-16
Admiral Lane
Allview Avenue
Arbor Drive
Bedford Avenue
Bow End Road
Boxwood Road
Broadview Terrace
Brooklawn Avenue
Burritt Avenue
Byington Place
Calf Pasture Beach
Circle Road
Clara Drive
College Street
Couch Street
Cranbury Woods Rd
Dairy Farm Court
Dairy Farm Road
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Forbell Drive
Garfield Street
Garner Street.
Glover Avenue
Golden Hill Street
Harrison Avenue
Harvard Street
Hazel Street
Highbrook Road
Hoyt Street
Imperial Drive
Jersey Lane
Karen Drive
Longshore Avenue
Marvin Street (EB)
Mechanic Street
Mill Brook Drive
Mohawk Drive
__________
Mott Avenue
New Street
North Taylor Ave
Oakfield Road
Old Trolley Way
Outlook Drive
Quaker Road
Rampart Road
Reed Street
Richlee Road
Rickey Lane
Robbins Square So.
Rockridge Drive
Rolling Lane
Roscoe Street
Ryan Avenue
Scribner Avenue
Sleepy Hollow Dr.
___
Splitrock Road
Stonybrook Road
Summitt Avenue
Tally Drive
Taylor Avenue
Toilsome Avenue
Trolley Place
Union Park
Water Street
West Avenue
West Couch Street
West Norwalk Road
Woodward Avenue
__FY 2016-17_____________________ ______
Alden Avenue
Appletree Lane
Arbor Court
Arlington Street
Arrowhead Court
Auburn Street
Barbara Drive
Bartlett Manor
Blue Mountain Road
Boulder Circle
Buckthorn Road
Buttery Road
Cavanaugh Street
Center Avenue
Center Avenue Ext.
Cindy Lane
Covewood Drive
Crescent Beach Road
Cutrone Road
Dixie Lane
Dock Road
East Beach Drive
Edgewood Street
Elliott Street
Esquire Road
Folwell Road
Forbell Drive
Glen Avenue
Greenfield Road
Heather Lane
Henry Street
Howard Avenue
Hudson Street
Indiana Place
Inwood Road
Jean Avenue
Kellee Court
Kellee Drive
Knollwood Road
Larsen Street
Leonard Street
Louise Street
Lycett Court
Maplewood Terrace
Marlin Drive
May Drive
Mayflower Road
Michael Street
Midwood Road
Novak Street
Nutmeg Place
Obrien Street
Parallel Street
Priscilla Road
Purdy Road East
Rebel Lane
Roland Avenue
Rudolf Lane
Short Street
South Beach Drive
Southwind Drive
Sunlit Drive
Tulip Tree Road
Twin Ledge Road
Vanderbilt Avenue
Weatherly Avenue
Yew Street
_
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
Yes _X__
No __
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request __$6,000,000____ ______
Approved _$5,000,000_____
If not, why is the project now included?
How was your cost estimate derived?
In depth GIS analysis using data derived by consulting engineering and estimates based on historical costs, extent of reconstruction
required and continued monitoring of each street’s Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes _X__
No __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
Over time will decrease repair and maintenance cost and extend useful equipment life.
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
No. of new positions ___________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The City’s streets are constantly under distress. Without constant refurbishment and maintenance of the City’s infrastructure, the overall
condition of the City’s streets will decline exponentially. The amount of funding requested is to maintain or improve the current PCI.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Without funding preventative maintenance techniques, future methods of repair will be more expensive and the overall condition (PCI) of
the City’s streets will decline. This would expose the City to increased costs, complaints and liability claims.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Parking Facility
Rehabilitation
PROJECT LIFE: 20+ years
SCHEDULED START: April 2012
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2013
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: E-2
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Project will include repaving the city hall parking
lot, miscellaneous curb and sidewalk repairs.
Project will provide for the maintenance of the 25-year-old current city hall driveways, parking lots, and repair
curbs and sidewalks walks for ADA Compliance.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
In-house
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
250
250
250
250
250
250
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C41-
-C42-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY:
Pavement Programs
PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Parking Facility Rehabilitation
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes x_
No _ _
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__
220,000_ ____
Approved _$___ 0_____
If not, why is the project now included? Project was previously identified in the Building management category.
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate of past expenditures
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The parking lot needs to be maintained.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Existing parking lot will continue to deteriorate, leading to increased repair costs.
Yes ___
No x_
No. of new positions ____________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Norwalk River Valley Trail– Phase 2
PROJECT LIFE: 25 years
SCHEDULED START: 2012
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: E-3
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Construction costs for piece of trail between
Union Park and New Canaan Avenue.
This portion will enable pedestrians and bicyclists to use the existing trail from Broad Street to the Maritime
Aquarium and eventually to Long Island Sound. ConnDOT has proposed to include construction of another
phase from Perry Avenue to Grist Mill Road as part of the Merritt Parkway interchange project. The design
funds for this section of the trail have been secured through the FTA and funds have been secured from
CTDEP to regionally provide a concept plan to extend trail to Danbury.
Requested funding is for City’s matching source of construction funding. Future funding requests
for neighborhood spurs to trail.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEAR
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
750
1,500
2,250
750
1,500
2,250
750
1,500
2,250
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C43-
-C44-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Pavement Programs
PROJECT TITLE: Norwalk River Valley Trail – Phase 2
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $_0_ ____
Yes x_
Approved _$__0_
No _ _
_____
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimated from previous construction costs.
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No _x_
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
This project provides an alternative form of transportation and additional recreational opportunity for the citizens of Norwalk. This has been
part of the Master Plan of Development for Norwalk since the early 1990s.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Less alternative forms of transportation and decreased recreational activities for residents.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Pavement Programs PROJECT TITLE: Washington Street Reconstruction
PROJECT LIFE: 20+ years
SCHEDULED START: August 2014
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: E-4
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2014
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
This project provides for the reconstruction of
Washington Street from Water St. to So. Main
Street. Key aspects of the work include the
removal and reconstruction of the brick paver
crosswalks in 4 locations with the updated design
that includes granite leading edge restraints to
prevent paver movement. Sidewalk repairs will
be made as needed.
The original brick paver crosswalks were installed in the 1980’s and have needed spot repairs. They have now
degraded to the point where settlement and other defects require complete removal and reconstruction. The
updated design for the crosswalks include flush granite curb at edge leading edge to lock the pavers in place.
The road will be milled and overlaid with bituminous concrete pavement.
Crosswalk locations will also receive new ADA Compliant Handicap Ramps.
Estimated Construction Costs:
Mill & Overlay Pavement $72,000
ADA Handicap Ramps $10,000
Brick Pavers Crosswalks $74,000
Granite Curb, Crosswalk Edge - $22,000
Misc Sidewalk Repair $22,000
NO REQUESTS THIS FISCAL YEAR
$200,000
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
In-house
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
200
200
200
200
200
200
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C45-
-C46-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY:
Pavement Programs
PROJECT TITLE: Washington Street Reconstruction
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes _
No _ x_
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $__
____
Approved
_$___ _____
If not, why is the project now included? Project was previously identified in the Building management category.
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate of past expenditures
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
________________
Yes ___
No x_
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
This section of roadway from Water Street to So. Main Street is an extremely active pedestrian area with numerous restaurants a, shops and
residencies. The crosswalks have deteriorated to the point that they will present a liability issue for the city.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
In addition to the obvious defects in the roadway and crosswalks, the condition of the road detracts from the area in general.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalk and Curbing – Road
Paving
CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curb
PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years
SCHEDULED START: 2012
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: F-1
DESCRIPTION:
This project will complement the Pavement
Management Program, providing funding to
install/replace
curbing
necessary
for
adequate roadway drainage and replace
deteriorated sidewalks on roads that are in
the Pavement Program. Urban roadways
with concrete curb and sidewalk are
particularly expensive.
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
The replacement of curbs and sidewalks along roadways in the Pavement Management Program is
required to ensure adequate drainage and complete the streetscape improvements, especially on
urban roadways with deteriorated concrete curb and sidewalk. On many streets the curb is almost
flush with the pavement encouraging parking on the sidewalk. Proper curbs are also required to
control storm runoff.
ADA regulations require the installation of compliant handicap ramps at all intersections any time a
road is paved. These concrete ramps contribute to the increased costs involved in our programs.
Failure to address these issues exposes the City to litigation.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C47-
-C48-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curbs
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalks and Curbing – Road Paving
Request ________
Yes _X__
Approved
No __
_____________
How was your cost estimate derived?
Estimate from ongoing program costs.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
4.
A. Increased Revenue
_________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
________________
No. of new positions ___________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Enhance safety for pedestrian transportation and lessen liability for City. Replacement of sidewalk sections is often required on roads
scheduled for re-paving, where adjustments to grade are needed or curb reveal has been lost (impacting drainage).
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Potential for increased liability to City as sidewalk trips and falls constitute one of the most common claims against the City. Also, in some
instances, curbing must be altered (and consequently the sidewalk) to establish an appropriate layout of a roadway, prior to it being re-paved.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalk and Curbs – Citywide
CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curb
PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years
SCHEDULED START: 2012
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
RANKING: F-2
X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Construction of sidewalks where none To enable pedestrian mobility and create a healthier and safer lifestyle. The City has 140
miles of sidewalk. The proposed funding will provide for only the most critical of sidewalk
exist and repair of existing sidewalks.
repairs and no footpath work. Work has been done in synch with road paving. Funds will
assist in implementing the plan working with Planning & Zoning. In 2013 over $715,000 was
spent on replacement sidewalks and ADA Compliance Handicap Ramps at roadway
intersections.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,500
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,500
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,500
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C49-
-C50-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curbs
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
3.
PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalks and Curbing – Citywide
Yes _X__
Request __$400,000______ ______
No __
Approved _$350,000_______
How was your cost estimate derived?
Estimate from ongoing program costs.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
4.
A. Increased Revenue
_________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
________________
No. of new positions ___________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Enhance safety for pedestrian transportation and lessen liability for City. Replacement of sidewalk sections is often required on roads
scheduled for re-paving, where adjustments to grade are needed or curb reveal has been lost (impacting drainage).
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Potential for increased liability to City as sidewalk trips and falls constitute one of the most common claims against the City. Also, in some
instances, curbing must be altered (and consequently the sidewalk) to establish an appropriate layout of a roadway, prior to it being re-paved.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PROJECT TITLE: Footpath Replacement
CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curb
PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years
SCHEDULED START: 2013
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
RANKING: F-3
X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Repair of existing footpaths.
To enable pedestrian mobility and create a healthier and safer lifestyle. The City has 45 miles of footpath
in addition to its 140 miles of sidewalk. The proposed funding will provide for only the most critical
footpath work.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
100
100
100
100
100
500
100
100
100
100
100
500
100
100
100
100
100
500
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C51-
-C52-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curbs
PROJECT TITLE: Footpath Replacement
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _ __
Request ____$ 0__ ______
Approved
No _x_
_$ 0__________
Some footpaths have recently been discovered to need attention.
2.
How was your cost estimate derived?
Estimate from ongoing program costs.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
4.
A. Increased Revenue
_________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
________________
No. of new positions ___________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Enhance safety for pedestrian transportation and lessen liability for City.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Potential for increased liability to City as trips and falls constitute one of the most common claims against the City.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curb
PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalks and Curbs –
City Buildings/Property
PROJECT LIFE: 20 Years
SCHEDULED START: 2013
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
RANKING: F- 4
X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Construction of sidewalks where none exist and repair of
existing sidewalks at City facilities. Projects could include
sidewalks at Mill Hill.
To enable pedestrian mobility and create a healthier and safer lifestyle. The City has 140 miles of
sidewalk. The proposed funding will provide for only the most critical of sidewalk repairs at City
facilities.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Ongoing
28
50
50
128
Ongoing
28
50
50
128
Ongoing
28
50
50
128
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C53-
-C54-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Sidewalk/Curbs
PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalks and Curbing – City
Buildings/Property
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request
Yes _ X__
50______
Approved
No
_
___0____
The Department has determined the occasional need to repair the sidewalks and curbs associated with City Buildings.
2.
How was your cost estimate derived?
Estimate from ongoing program costs.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
4.
A. Increased Revenue
_________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
________________
No. of new positions ___________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Enhance safety for pedestrian transportation and lessen liability for City.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Potential for an increased liability to the City as sidewalk trips and falls constitute on of the most common claims against the City.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Stormwater Management
PROJECT LIFE: 40 Years
SCHEDULED START: 2013
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
RANKING: G-1
X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
This project entails the replacement, repair and
construction of new local drainage as needed in
conjunction with the Pavement Management Program.
Repair or installation of minor to mid-sized drainage systems and culvert cleaning as needed during the
year. Drainage improvements are often required on roads scheduled for re-paving and there are several
potential drainage improvements throughout the City that have been investigated and estimated.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
PROJECT TITLE: General Drainage
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Ongoing
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
Ongoing
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
Ongoing
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C55-
-C56-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Stormwater Management
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
PROJECT TITLE: General Drainage
Yes _X__
Request __$400,000______ ______
No ____
Approved _$250,000_______
How was your cost estimate derived?
Estimate from ongoing program costs and proposed plans.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
4.
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
________________
No. of new positions ___________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
There are numerous areas of the City that require drainage improvements that are relatively small in nature, that can be rectified quickly and
efficiently through this program.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Continued flooding problems and destruction to personal property. Flooding also is a hazard to the traveling public.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Stormwater Management PROJECT TITLE: Honeysuckle-Daphne
Friendly Storm Drainage Improvements
PROJECT LIFE: 40 Years
SCHEDULED START: 2013
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
RANKING: G-2
X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Implementation of storm water
improvements to redirect storm drainage
runoff from Honeysuckle Drive that currently
goes into the Saddle Road storm drainage
system towards Daphne Drive and upgrade
the existing storm drainage system from
Daphne Drive and on Friendly Road, to the
outlet at Friendly Pond.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
Significant flooding has been experienced in this area on Saddle Road on a frequent
recurring basis. This is the recommended solution in the 2013 Norwalk Drainage
Study that will result in reduced flood frequency and flood levels in this area of the City.
2015-16
2016-17
200
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
200
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
150
1,000
1,150
350
1,000
1,350
350
1,000
1,350
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C57-
-C58-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Stormwater Management
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
PROJECT TITLE: General Drainage
Request
Yes _ __
$0
Approved
No _X___
$0
How was your cost estimate derived?
Preliminary Design Plans by Consultant
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department? Yes ____
No X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
4.
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The residents of the area have requested this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Further flooding of property and homes
.
No. of new positions ___________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT LIFE: 15 years
SCHEDULED START: Ongoing
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: G-3
DESCRIPTION:
Removal of sediment, trees and other materials from
City watercourses, as well as the installation of
various storm drainage best management practices.
Potential locations include Metro North Culverts,
North Taylor Avenue, Oak Hills to Gillies Lane,
Grumman Avenue at Newtown Avenue, along with
other point discharge locations. This would also
include work at locations along Bettts Pond Brook,
Lloyd Road, the Lawrence Street Pump Station
Area Watershed, Park Hill Avenue and Fodor Farm
as recommended in the 2013 Norwalk Drainage
Study.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PROJECT TITLE: Watercourse Maintenance
PRIOR
YEARS
Engineering/Design
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Most City watercourses that are integral parts of the City storm drainage system are severely blocked with
debris and sediment that must be removed to help alleviate flooding potential. Much of the sediment is the
result of years of road sanding operations that have been replaced with alternate methods.
The Department has prepared an updated storm drainage system evaluation of problem areas identified
throughout the City (The 2013 Norwalk Drainage Study). This study has developed storm drainage
improvement recommendations to alleviate flooding in the Betts Brook area, Oak Hills area, Lloyd Road
area, the Lawrence Street Pump Station area watershed, Park Hill Avenue area and the Fodor Farm area.
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
100
100
100
100
400
ongoing
1,400
900
900
900
4,100
Ongoing
1,500
1,000
1,000
1,000
4,500
ongoing
1,500
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,500
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C59-
-C60-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT TITLE: Watercourse Maintenance
1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $_1,000,000__
Yes_x_
Approved
No _ _
_$__0 _____
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Planning estimate
3. Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
4.
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
To alleviate flooding
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Increased flooding
Yes ___
No _x_
No. of new positions ____________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT LIFE: 5 years
PROJECT TITLE: Stormwater Quality Management
SCHEDULED START: Ongoing
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: G-4
_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
This project is to continue and maintain the progress the City has made in
improving the condition of the sound and its contributing rivers, streams and
brooks. This project is for the implementation of several water quality
improvements such as the replacement of defunct storm water filters, cleaning of
water quality structures, and the installation of water-quality structures at newly
selected locations, etc. Funds would also be used for public education,
participation in the FEMA CMS program which may entitle residents to reduced
flood insurance.
The Department in cooperation with the Health Department and HW/RW have
uncovered and corrected several water quality issues, including correcting
bacterial problems at Calf Pasture Beach, Woodward Avenue and are currently
working on a couple of others. This along with the regular monitoring of the
Norwalk, Silvermine and Five Mile River by HW/RW have lead to significant
water quality improvements but many more are still required. These funds are
also needed to comply with new MS4 General Permit requirements.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
.
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equip./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
500
200
200
200
1,100
500
200
200
200
1,100
500
200
200
200
1,100
REVENUE (Specify) - Sales
COST REDUCTIONS
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C61-
-C62-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT TITLE: Stormwater Quality Management
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request
Yes _ _
$______
Approved
2.
How was your cost estimate derived? Quotes for vendors
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
No _X_
$ 0__
Yes __x_
No _
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
_____
___
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
____
C. Additional Salary Costs
_________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
________
No. of new positions ___________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
This project is required to help maintain and improve water quality in the town’s rivers, streams and harbors,and to meet requirements of the
pending new MS4 General Permit requirements.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Continued impaired water quality. Violation of permit
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT LIFE: 5 years
SCHEDULED START: 2013
PROJECT TITLE: Water Street Outlet Maintenance
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: G-5
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Dredging and maintenance of existing drainage
outlets at several locations on Water Street.
As part of the City’s easement agreement with various property owner’s on Water Street, the City is
responsible for maintain the drainage outfalls and the water channels depths. Located at Norwest Marine and
Total Marine. Outfalls at both these locations were installed in 1920-1980’s and require dredging
maintenance. This was last done in 2008 and earlier in 1997. Survey performed indicates dredging on
required again at these locations.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
300
300
600
300
300
600
300
300
600
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C63-
-C64-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT TITLE: Water Street Outlet Maintenance
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_250,000__ ____
If not, why is the project now included? To address easement requirements.
Yes_X__
Approved _$_0_ _
No _
_
_____
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Estimate and previous maintenance dredging contracts.
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
____ ________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The City is obligated by easement to maintain the outlet area and dredge as necessary
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
The City could be found in violation of easement obligations.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
Yes ___
No _x_
No. of new positions ____________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT TITLE: Keeler Brook Storm Water Improvements
PROJECT LIFE: 40 years
SCHEDULED START:
RANKING: G-6
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
The design and construction of improvements
recommended for Keeler Brook. Future project to
include existing storm sewer improvements in
watershed.
The Keeler Brook drainage study required as part of the Connecticut DEP order for the Keeler Brook
watershed has identified several improvements needed for the watercourse. Improvements to the storm
water collection system to handle the peak flows associated with the urbanized nature of the area are also
necessary to prevent it from entering the sanitary sewer system. The brook often floods local residents and
streets including Gilly’s Lane, Ledgebrook Drive, West Cedar Street, Scribner Avenue and Route 1.
Models have shown that the recurrence interval of flooding is two years.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
320
320
Site Costs & Acquisition
300
300
Construction
1,000
4,000
2,000
7,000
1,620
4,000
2,000
7,620
1,620
4,000
2,000
7,620
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C65-
-C66-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT TITLE: Keeler Brook Storm Water Improvements
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x_ No ___
Request $_1,000,000_____
Approved
2.
How was your cost estimate derived? Scope and price proposal from engineering firm.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
$__0______
Yes ___
No _x_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______0__________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______0__________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______0___________
D. Additional operating expenses
______0__________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions 0_________
_________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
This project would address serious recurring flooding on several roads in the Keeler Brook area and address a DEP order. Additional benefits
include better and safer travel on local roads.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Additional flooding in the area could occur before a plan could be developed to help mitigate flooding in the Keeler Brook area. Possible
DEP orders and sanctions. Matching funds will be required for federal funds authorized.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT LIFE: 40 years
SCHEDULED START: 2012
PROJECT TITLE: Culvert Rehabilitation
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2020
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: G-7
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Structural lining of 36” Storm Drain on Clinton
Avenue.
Structural lining of 700’ of Corrugated Metal pipe
carrying a portion of the Indian River.
FY 2012-13 Project is for the structural lining of the 36’ corrugated metal Storm Drain on Clinton Avenue
which has failed and creates road collapse during intense rainfalls. This work will be coordinated with
drainage improvements on Connecticut Avenue by CTDOT.
FY 2015-16 Project is to line Corrugated Metal pipe which is deteriorating and releasing iron oxide bacteria
into Indian River. The structural integrity of the pipe is compromised and will eventually collapse. There
exists the possibility of a formal DEP order to repair.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
400
400
400
400
400
400
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C67-
-C68-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Storm Water
PROJECT TITLE: Culvert Rehabilitation
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $__0______
Yes x_
Approved
No _ _
_$_0____
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimate.
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No _x_
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Collapse of this pipe could result inn flooding of neighborhood. A strong potential exists for a DEP order to investigate and correct situation.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Continued release of iron oxide bacteria and potential flooding of neighborhood should pipe collapse.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Traffic
PROJECT TITLE: Traffic Signals at Various Locations
PROJECT LIFE: 20 years
SCHEDULED START: Ongoing
RANKING:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
H-1
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement of obsolete traffic signals, some in excess
of 30 years old, such as France @ Cannon, Gregory @
First, Rowayton @ Cudlipp, Meadow Street @ Fire
House, First @ Sycamore, Newtown @ Allen Road,
Rowayton @ Wilson, West Avenue @ Garner, West
Ave Pedestrian Crossing (20 West Avenue), Wall
Street at Isaac and Wall Street @ Pedestrian Crossing
(Globe Theater). Funds are also required to replace
existing Opticom Priority Control units.
Update
controllers and communication on New Canaan
Avenue.
These signals and or equipment are beyond the useful life span and require replacement. This part of a
continuing program to replace obsolete signals across the City so to better manage traffic flows.
Approximately 10 existing opticom units need to be replaced at various locations need to be replaced.
Provide battery back-up at critical intersection. Six(6) Traffic Signal Systems at Wall Street @ Main,
Wall Street @ Commerce, Van Zant Street @ Osborne, Van Zant Street @ Fire House, Ward Street @
Freese Court and Fox Run @ Little Brook/Red Coat will be advertised for bid in March 2013. This
Signal Project will utilize the entire funding available in the Traffic Signal Capital Accounts. Additional
traffic signal locations that need upgrade are listed under Project Description at left.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
250
250
250
250
250
1,250
250
250
250
250
250
1,250
250
250
250
250
250
1,250
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C69-
-C70-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Traffic
PROJECT TITLE: Traffic Signals at Various Locations
Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request
Yes _x
$___250,000____ ______
2.
How was your cost estimate derived? Engineer estimate based on recent pricing
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Approved
No _ _
$_____250,000__
Yes ___
No _x_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The City has several signals that are over 30 years old and require replacement.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
The signals can have the potential to fail and cause injury due to age and condition.
No. of new positions
___________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Traffic
PROJECT LIFE:
SCHEDULED START: 2015
PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Markings and Signage
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: H-2
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Pavement markings have been budgeted within
the Pavement Management Program. This
project is being developed to encompass all
pavement markings and signage along city
roadways. This item will include normal
centerline, shoulder, turn arrows, stop bars and
will begin the implementation of a bike lane
network for the city.
All city streets that require pavement markings, whether centerline, shoulder, turn arrows or stop
bars need to have these markings refreshed periodically. The reflectivity of the markings plays a
significant role in vehicle safety
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
Public Works has been working with the Mayor’ Task Force for Pedestrian and Bicycles and will
evaluate candidate streets for bike lanes for roads in the Pavement Management Program.
Roads that are in good condition to receive pavement markings can also be considered in the
program.
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
300
200
200
700
300
200
200
700
200
200
200
700
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C71-
-C72-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Traffic
PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Marking and Signage
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $__0______
Yes
Approved
No _ _x
_$_0____
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimate.
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No _x_
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Pavement markings must be maintained on city roadways on a periodic program Proposed bicycle lanes include several addition line striping
in addition to traditional road centerline and shoulder
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Pavement markings are essential for vehicle guidance in limited visibility conditions. Proper installation of bike lanes will make the roadways
safer for both motorists and bikers.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Traffic
PROJECT TITLE: Incident Management System
PROJECT LIFE:
SCHEDULED START: 2015
RANKING:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
H-3
DESCRIPTION:
This project will replace our older traffic cameras
and add some additional cameras to better
monitor traffic and manage traffic incidents on
major traffic corridors in the City. This project will
also incorporate road weather sensors and
provide battery back-up power for critical
intersections.
Purchase and installation of
variable message signs (VMS) at selected
locations.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Several of our traffic cameras have reached the end of their life-span (over 15 years old) and
need to be replaced. There are several critical intersections in the City that need back-up
power to maintain safe traffic operations should there be some type of power failure. The road
sensors would provide our highway department with accurate weather information to allow them
to prepare the most economical response to ice and snow conditions. The VMS would advise
travelers of existing and upcoming traffic projects, events, accidents, etc. so they could plan
their travel routes accordingly. All of this information would be feedback to our existing traffic
management software and to the web at a future date.
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
250
TOTAL
250
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
750
750
100
100
1,700
250
750
750
100
100
1,950
250
750
750
100
100
1,950
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C73-
-C74-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Traffic
PROJECT TITLE: Incident Management System
1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five-year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request $_______
If not, why is the project now included? To address aging equipment
Yes _
Approved
2.
How was your cost estimate derived? Engineer estimate based on recent pricing
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
No X_ _
$_________
Yes ___
No _x_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
No. of new positions
____________
________________________
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Original traffic cameras need to be replaced, over 15 years old. Backup power at key intersections will allow normal signal operation during power
failure. Traffic incidents on I-95 that shift traffic to Route 1 and other local roads can be monitored and the best detour route can be implemented.
5,
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Older cameras systems will fail, the lack of backup power at key intersections will continue to aggravate traffic conditions. Proper detour of traffic
due to incidents that close roadways will reduce congestion along the major corridors.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Traffic PROJECT TITLE: Transportation Management Plan Implementation
PROJECT LIFE: 15 years
SCHEDULED START: 2012
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
RANKING: H-4
x
_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
This project is for the design and implementation of recommended intersection
and roadway improvements made in the Norwalk Comprehensive
Transportation Management Plans (TMP). Funds would be used to design and
construct improvements at selected intersections and road corridors. Projects
would be phased over several years
The City has or is just completing several plans including the Pedestrian and Bike
plan, the Connectivity Study and the Norwalk Comprehensive Transportation Master
Plan (TMP). Several recommendations were made as the result of public and
stakeholder meetings and workshops. This project would allow for the
implementation of many of these projects to achieve a better and more complete
street. In addition, the projects would be designed to take advantage of the City new
traffic communication system.
Possible roadways include Fairfield Ave, Washington St, West Rocks Road,
Calf Pasture Beach Road and East Avenue. Possible intersections include West
at Belden/Mott, Highland at Soundview, Flax Hill at Richards, Flax Hill at
Taylor, Murray at Newtown. Additional details can be found in the TMP.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
200
120
300
620
1,000
1,200
1,500
500
500
4,700
1,200
1,320
1,800
500
500
5,320
1,200
1;320
1,800
500
500
5,320
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equip./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify) - Sales
COST REDUCTIONS
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C75-
-C76-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Traffic
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
PROJECT TITLE: Transportation Master Plan
Implementation
Request
Yes _x_
$ 400,000_____
Approved
No __
$ 200,000__
How was your cost estimate derived?
Cost projections developed from previous construction projections.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes __x_
No _
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
_____
___
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
____
C. Additional Salary Costs
_________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
________
No. of new positions ___________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
There is a growing request from the public to better a good and effective yet complete transportation
address those concerns.
5.
system. These projects would help to
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The current economy permits project like this to be built economically and rapidly allowing the public to appreciate the improvements sooner.
Delays in funding this project until a later date could possible result in much higher construction costs. In addition, by having designs available, the
City may be able to take advantage of some undesignated federal construction funding.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Trees
PROJECT LIFE: 40- 50 years
SCHEDULED START:
RANKING: I-1
PROJECT TITLE: City-wide Tree Planting Program
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement of removed trees or planting of trees in
areas lacking trees.
Trees provide social, community, environmental and economic benefit to a community. They increase
quality of life for residents of the community. Funds would help the City maintain its status as a Tree City.
These funds also helped secure Norwalk 1st place nation-wide as winner of the Home Depot Foundation’s
Community Tree Award for Small Communities in 2006. Will also enable to maintain its long standing
recognition as a “Tree City” by the Arbor Day Foundation. Increased funding needed to more promptly
replace the hundreds of trees lost to weather in recent years.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
50
60
60
60
60
60
350
50
60
60
60
60
60
350
50
60
60
60
60
60
350
Eqpt./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C77-
-C78-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Trees
PROJECT ITLE: City–wide Tree Planting Program
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $__50,000
Yes x
_ ____
Approved
No _ _
_$__50,000_ _____
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
To improve quality of life
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Decreased quality of life and urban warming
Yes ___
No _x_
No. of new positions ____________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: FHWA Match
PROJECT LIFE: 15 years
PROJECT TITLE: FHWA Matching Funds
SCHEDULED START: Ongoing
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: J-1
_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
FHWA through CTDOT and SWRPA, make funds available annually
through various programs to cover studies, ROW acquisition and design
and construction costs for roadway and other transportation-related
projects that occur on collector or higher functionally- classified streets.
Most of these programs require the community provide a specified
percentage of project costs as a match. Projects for consideration would
include traffic signal upgrades, road improvements suggested by the
Norwalk Comprehensive TMP and ITS projects.
Having these funds available, the City may be able to take advantage of
funds that are not-appropriated in a specific year due to project delays,
etc. In addition, these funds could be identified as available when
submitting applications for funding. Since CTDOT irregularly issues
requests for projects, these projects can’t always be identified in capital
requests, even though the State requires a commitment of money. By
having funds available, the City is able to submit its application.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equip./Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Ongoing
250
250
500
Ongoing
250
250
500
Ongoing
250
250
500
REVENUE (Specify) - Sales
COST REDUCTIONS
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C79-
-C80-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: SAFETEALU Match
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
PROJECT TITLE: FHWA Matching Funds
Request
Yes _x_
$_250,000____
Approved
No __
$ 0__
How was your cost estimate derived?
Quotes for vendors
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes __x_
No _
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
_____
___
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
____
C. Additional Salary Costs
_________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
________
No. of new positions _______________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project
. This project would allow the City to take full -advantage of federal grants, sometimes being reimbursed 80cents on each dollar invested.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Potential loss of federal reimbursement for needed City projects.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: SAFETEA-LU Match
PROJECT LIFE: 20 years
SCHEDULED START: ONGOING
RANKING: J-2
PROJECT TITLE: Safe Routes to Schools
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: ONGOING
X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
The City is prepared to submit a project to
ConnDOT for construction funding in 2010 under
the SAFETEA-LU SRTS program. This item is to
supplement any federal funding received.
The City is eligible for 100% federal funding for the construction of improvements under the SAFETEALUSRTS program that encourage students in Grade K-8 to walk and bike to school as opposed to other
transportation alternatives. Currently, only $1.3M is available state-wide annually for this program thus some
City funds may be needed to fully implement a project. The City has targeted several possible projects for
future funding including Gregory Blvd/Calf Pasture Beach Road (bikeway and sidewalks), Stuart
Avenue/Fillow Street Area (sidewalks), Silvermine School Area (sidewalks) and Highland Avenue
(sidewalks and bikeway).
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
200
200
200
200
200
200
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C81-
-C82-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: SAFETEA-LU Match
PROJECT TITLE: Safe Routes to Schools
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes x_
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
No __
Request $___200,000 _
Approved
2.
How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimate history
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
4.
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
_$_
0_____
No _x_
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
A set amount of funds are dedicated to the region for improvements to encourage walking or biking to K-8. Although projects are 100%
federally and state funded, additional funds may be needed to supplement or maintain project scope
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
A lost opportunity to obtain federal and state funds for most of the total project cost.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
CATEGORY: Special Projects
PROJECT TITLE: Transfer Station Compactor
Replacements
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
SCHEDULED START: 2013
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2015
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
RANKING: K-1
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Transfer Station Repairs:
2 of 3 Municipal Solid Waste Compactors Replacement of 2 of the 3 compactors at the Transfer Station was completed. The
were replaced in FY14-15. This request compactors are original equipment installed in 1982. The Transfer Station is a vital facility
for the disposal of municipal solid waste and is the location of the resident recycling center.
is for final unit.
This funding is to replace the final compactor.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Eqpt./Furnishings
276
140
416
276
140
416
276
140
416
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-C83-
-C84-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
1.
CATEGORY: Special Projects
PROJECT TITLE: Transfer Station Capital Improvements
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x
Request $_____276__ ____
Approved
No _
_$__276______
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimate using data from replacement of lower scale in Feb 2011.
3.
4.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
______________________
D. Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
______________________
______________________
Yes ___
No _x_
No. of new positions ____________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The Transfer Station provides a vital service to citizens for the disposal and recycling of their waste. The waste compactors must be in proper
condition to process the quantity of municipal solid waste delivered to the Station.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred or not funded?
Without compactors the facility cannot process the tonnage of municipal solid waste that is disposed of in the City of Norwalk.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Parking Authority
2015-16
REQUEST
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
1. Parking Facilities
747
747
747
747
2. Revenue Control/Smartparking
200
300
150
150
947
1,047
897
897
PROJECT TITLE
2019-20
REQUEST
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Parking Authority
PROJECT LIFE:
PROJECT TITLE: Parking Facilities
SCHEDULED START: FY 2017
RANKING: 1
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Parking facility upgrades and repairs as recommended by the Capital repairs and security services necessary to continue to
2013 facility assessment plan.
maintain the structural and working integrity of the parking
facilities.
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
5,257
747
747
747
747
8,245
5,257
747
747
747
747
8,245
5,257
747
747
747
747
8,245
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
D-1
D-2
2014-2015
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Parking Authority
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Parking Facilities
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $______________________
Yes ___
No _X _
Approved _$_______________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Engineering Estimates.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
__debt service______________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
To provide a safe environment for parkers and to extend the useful life of the parking facilities as important city assets and to ensure structural
And working integrity, continued public access and availability.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Unmet structural repairs will further deteriorate the building and incur potential liability and safety concerns. And higher maintenance costs.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Parking Authority
PROJECT LIFE:
PROJECT TITLE: Revenue Control/SmartParking
SCHEDULED START: FY 2016
RANKING: 2
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: FY 2018
X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Upgrade and replace revenue control equipment and technology Replace obsolete revenue control equipment and update
system wide as recommended in the 2013 SmartParking technology in order to provide enhanced customer service
Technology Plan.
coordinated wayfinding functionality and decreased drive time, real
time parking availability via smartphone and vehicle applications,
NO REQUEST THIS FISCAL YEAR.
real time occupancy analytics, improved audit function, increased
compliance, efficient and effective productivity.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
100
200
300
150
150
900
100
200
300
150
150
900
100
200
300
150
150
900
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
D-3
D-4
2014-2015
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Parking Authority
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Revenue Control/SmartParking
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $______________________
Yes ___
No _X _
Approved _$_______________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Vendor Estimates.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _X__
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_____X____________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
__debt service______________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Provide enhanced customer service through technology and updated equipment as well as more efficient, effective productivity. Provides real
Time occupancy and demand data to enable improved parking policy and rate analysis. And, increases wayfinding efficiency thereby decreasing
Drive around time benefitting the environment by lowering wasteful gas emissions.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Lost revenues, increased parking violation appeals and complaints, ineffective parking policy decisions, frustrated parkers/drivers.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
1. WWTP Main Lift Pump Replacement
3,000
2. Ely Ave/Bouton St. Hydraulic Repair
1,000
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
2,000
3. Supplemental Treatment Upgrade
2,000
4. Solids Handling Facility
3,000
2,000
5. Keeler Brook Pump Station Upgrade
2,000
6. Collection System Rehabilitation
2,000
1,000
1,000
4,000
3,000
1,000
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
4,000
7,000
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority
PROJECT TITLE: WWTP Main Lift Pump Replacement
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
SCHEDULED START:
RANKING:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
1 – GO Funding
2015
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
Ongoing
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Emergency replacement of 6 existing main lift pumps, VFDs, electrical
components, mechanical piping, and controls with 6 new pumps and
ancillary equipment.
The six main lift pumps at the WWTP are catastrophically failing. In
order to prevent environmental and public health issues, new pumps and
appurtenances are needed.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
150
150
2,850
2,850
3,000
3,000
3,000
3,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-E1-
-E2-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
PROJECT TITLE: WWTP Main Lift Pump Replacement
Request ____ ______
Yes _ _
No _X_
Approved _________
How was your cost estimate derived?
Based on cost estimates from our consultant engineer.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _X
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
________________
________________
________________
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
No. of new positions _________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The MLPs at the WWTP are critical to ensure that sanitary sewage is conveyed through the WWTP.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.
The MLPs at the WWTP are critical to ensure that sanitary sewage is conveyed through the WWTP. Without the pumps, raw sewage
enters the Norwalk River and Long Island Sound.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority
PROJECT TITLE: Ely Avenue and Bouton Street Hydraulic
Repair
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
SCHEDULED START:
RANKING:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
2 – GO Funding
2015
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
2017
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Sanitary sewer issue on Ely Avenue.
There are multiple high points in the sanitary sewer interceptor (gravity
system) that creates a surcharged condition resulting in excessive
grease and grit in the line.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
1,000
2,000
3,000
1,000
2,000
3,000
1,000
2,000
3,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-E3-
-E4-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
PROJECT TITLE: Ely Ave/Bouton St Hydraulic Repair
Request ____ ______
Yes _ _
No _X_
Approved _________
How was your cost estimate derived?
Based on cost estimates prepared by WPCA consultant.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _X
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
________________
________________
________________
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
No. of new positions _________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The surcharged interceptor creates a major maintenance issue at this location. Routine cleaning only removes a portion that builds up.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.
Grit and grease could potentially cause a blockage in the interceptor that would result in a major sewage release impacting the environment
and public.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority
PROJECT TITLE: Supplemental Treatment Upgrade
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
SCHEDULED START: 2014
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 2017
RANKING: 3 – GO Funding
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Supplemental Treatment Upgrade
Required to address aging CSO/Wet Weather drum screens that are
used to treat flow above 30 mgd. Original facility was installed in 1980
and screens are beyond their expected useful life.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
500
2,000
2,500
500
2,000
2,500
500
2,000
2,500
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-E5-
-E6-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Supplemental Treatment Upgrade
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes _X_
No __
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved. Request ____$500,000 ______
Approved
___$500,000______
If not, why is the project now included? WWTP Phase II is on indefinite hold and these screens must continue to operate.
2.
How was your cost estimate derived?
Based on cost estimates contained in the WPCA’s Asset Management Plan.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _X
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
________________
________________
________________
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
No. of new positions _________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Required to address aging CSO/Wet Weather drum screens that are used to treat flow above 30 mgd. Original facility was installed in 1980
and screens are beyond their expected useful life.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.
CSO/Wet Weather drum screens are used to treat flow above 30 mgd and are required to be in operation in accordance with the City’s
NPDES permit. The City would be in violation without operational drum screens.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority
PROJECT TITLE: Solids Handling Facility
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
SCHEDULED START:
RANKING:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
4 – GO Funding
2014
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
2017
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Solids Handling Facility
The 1990’s WWTP upgrade only provided provisions for liquid sludge
hauling from the solids handling facility. Liquid hauling is very expensive
(today) and not a viable option. OMI, at their cost, installed a belt filter
press to dewater sludge and dispose of sludge cake which is more
economical to haul and dispose.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
200
3,000
2,000
5,200
200
3,000
2,000
5,200
200
3,000
2,000
5,200
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-E7-
-E8-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
3.
PROJECT TITLE: Solids Handling Facility
Yes _X _
Request ____ $200,000 ______
Approved
No __
____$200,000_____
How was your cost estimate derived?
Based on cost estimates contained in the WPCA’s Asset Management Plan.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _X
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
________________
________________
________________
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
No. of new positions _________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Liquid sludge hauling from the solids handling facility is very expensive (today) and not a viable option.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.
When OMI’s contract expires, OMI or other contract operator contracted by the WPCA will charge a premium for solids handling due to a
lack of sufficient dewatering equipment.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority
PROJECT TITLE: Keeler Brook Pump Station Upgrade
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
SCHEDULED START:
RANKING:
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
5 – GO Funding
2018
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
2020
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement of Keeler Brook Pump Station
Rehabilitate the 4-MGD Keeler Brook Pump Station built in 1971 with
minimal updates since construction. The harsh environment has
greatly degraded this pump station.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-E9-
-E10
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
4.
PROJECT TITLE: Keeler Brook Pump Station Upgrade
Request ____ ______
Yes _ _
No _X_
Approved _________
How was your cost estimate derived?
Based on cost estimates of similar projects.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _X
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
________________
________________
________________
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
No. of new positions _________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Pump station components are 1971 and require updating.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.
Failure of this system will have major water quality impact as sewage will not be conveyed from the Keeler Brook and Five Mile service area
to the WWTP.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Water Pollution Control Authority
PROJECT TITLE: Collection System Rehabilitation
PROJECT LIFE: 50 years
SCHEDULED START: 2005
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Ongoing
RANKING: 6 – GO Funding
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Collection System Rehabilitation
This on-going series of projects are needed to rehabilitate the City’s
approximately 170 miles of sanitary sewer that are in many cases over
100 years old. The WPCA’s contract operator has completed closedcircuit television inspection of the sanitary sewer system and has
identified $20-million in repairs needed to ensure that sewage can be
conveyed to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) without
interruption of service.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
9,650
2,000
1,000
1,000
13,650
9,650
2,000
1,000
1,000
13,650
9,650
2,000
1,000
1,000
13,650
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-E11-
-E12-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Water Pollution Control Authority
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
2.
PROJECT TITLE: Collection System Rehabilitation
Yes _X_
Request $9,650,000____ ______
Approved
No __
$9,650,000_________
How was your cost estimate derived?
Based on cost estimates contained in the WPCA’s Asset Management Plan.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _X
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
4.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
________________
________________
________________
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
No. of new positions _________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
This on-going series of projects are needed to rehabilitate the City’s approximately 200 miles of sanitary sewer that is in many cases over
100 years old.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded.
The WPCA’s contract operator has completed closed-circuit television inspection of the sanitary sewer system and has identified $20-million
in repairs needed to ensure that sewage can be conveyed to the WWTP without interruption of service.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Board of Education
PROJECT TITLE
1. Norwalk Early Childhood Center (Phase
2)
2. District Bldg. Management System
(BMS)
3. District Technology
2015-16
REQUEST
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
500,000
556,988
1,000,000
1,032,800
4. West Rocks MS (Window
Replacement)
800,000
5. District Paving & Concrete
535,000
350,000
280,000
315,000
6. District Fire Alarm System (FA)
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
357,500
7,948,920
7. Jefferson E. S. Construction
8. Cranbury E. S. Construction
255,250
5,756,650
10,016,970
7,604,450
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
4,424,788
2,240,300
1,532,800
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION
PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years
PROJECT TITLE: Norwalk Early Childhood Center (Phase 2)
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015
RANKING: 1
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2016
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Phase Two of Construction for the Norwalk Early Childhood The CREC report recommended the consolidation of the Norwalk
Center for the 50/50 Special Education Pre-K Center.
Public Schools 50/50 Special Education Pre-K Classes. The Board of
Education has approved the 11 Allen Road Site as the location for the
new Norwalk Early Childhood Center. This consolidation of Special
Education Pre-K is the first step in developing a continuum of services
for Special Education to slow the growth of out of district placements.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction (includes remediation)
1,651,000
514,671
2,165,671
42,317
42,317
1,651,000
556,988
2,207,988
1,651,000
556,988
2,207,988
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
F-1
F-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Norwalk Early Childhood Center (Phase 2)
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $____________________
Approved
No _X _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Cost estimates are derived from cost proposal by Silver Petrucelli & Associates Study.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ X__
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_$(290,000)______
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Without moving forward with the full completion of the Norwalk Early Childhood Center we cannot move forward with the development of an in
house SPED program to serve students in Norwalk and prevent the outflow of students to out of district placements. There is a strong need as
cited by the CREC report for a consolidation of our SPED Pre-K Classrooms so that we can begin the building of a continuum of education for
special needs students.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION
PROJECT LIFE: 10 Years
PROJECT TITLE: District Building Management System (BMS)
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015
RANKING: 2
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 12/31/2015
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Replace current Building Management System serving HVAC Current Building Management Systems have exceeded their
systems at 16 district schools & Central Kitchen.
useful life and in need of replacement to web based direct digital
control (DDC). The majority of current systems are dependent
on pneumatic (compressed air) control and a 56k modem for
communication. Set points and central control are difficult to
navigate and provide consistent temperature throughout. As a
result, the district is consuming increased utility costs as opposed
to providing a streamlined approach in line with lower utility
costs. Web based control provides an advantage to access the
BMS in order to achieve temperature comfort on demand.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
F-3
F-4
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION
1.
PROJECT TITLE: District Building Management System (BMS)
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $____________________
Approved
No _X _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Cost estimates are derived from current day pricing of industry standards for a task of this size.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ X__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_$0_____________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Increased comfort cooling/heating calls from students, staff and administrators have placed the need for the project as a high priority.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The district will continue to utilize increased fuel and utilities resulting in higher costs..
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION
PROJECT LIFE: 3 Years
PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT TECHNOLOGY
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015
RANKING: 3
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2018
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
This request supports our need to continue the implementation of
Technology in the District consistent with the Board of Education’s
support of this project.
We are moving forward in the
implementation of network upgrades as well as devices/computer
refresh and hard acquisitions.
Beginning in July 2015, the District has begun the first year of a three
(3) year Strategic Technology Plan, approved by the Board of Education
and the Connecticut State Department of Education. These purchases
are necessary for the implementation of that plan in accordance to the
timeline and are also the foundation for the Common Core State
Standards initiative (CCSS).
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
5,164,000
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
5,164,000
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
1,032,800
5,164,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
F-5
F-6
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION
1.
PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT TECHNOLOGY
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $1,075,000_____________
Approved
No __ _
$500,000_______
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ ___
No _X_
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_$______________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
With the new Common Core State Standards (CCSS) requirements, the Board of Education does not have the current infrastructure, computer hardware, and
instructional hardware/software to meet the Federal guidelines. Although this Capital Budget provides some fundamental technology resources to begin
implementing the CCSS, it is significantly less than what is truly needed to ensure that CCSS are fully maintained.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
With many of the computers and systems in the District aging the ability for teachers and Students to use technology to improve learning is
drastically hindered. The District 3 year Strategic Plan was just completed in 2012 (by the Technology Committee) to address the needs of
stakeholders and this Capital plan mirrors the Districts improvement plan exactly. To this end, it will be impossible to adhere to the upcoming
Technology Plan if not fully funded.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION
PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years
PROJECT TITLE: West Rocks MS (Window replacement)
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015
RANKING: 4
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 9/30/2016
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replace all exterior windows & entrance doors.
Current exterior windows and entrance doors have exceeded
their useful life and in need of replacement. Due to the integrity
of the current interior windows, there is a safety and security risk.
In addition, fuel consumption and utility costs are not aligned
with current day energy efficiency savings.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
100,000
100,000
Construction
250,000
250,000
Equipment/Materials
400,000
400,000
50,000
50,000
800,000
800,000
800,000
800,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
F-7
F-8
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION
1.
PROJECT TITLE: West Rocks MS (Window Replacement)
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $____________________
Approved
No _X _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Cost estimates are derived from current day pricing & industry standards for a tack of this size.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ X__
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_$(290,000)______
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
_Repeated need for service requests & utility costs will be impacted in a positive way.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Current windows original to building and comprised of metal single pane lites.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Security risk, safety risk, increased utility costs & increased fuel consumption costs.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION
PROJECT LIFE: 25 Years
PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT PAVING & CONCRETE
SCHEDULED START:
RANKING: 5
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2019
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Asphalt pavement and concrete replacement at 20 school sites to To replace broken and deteriorated asphalt at all school sites.
eliminate deterioration of parking lots, drives, curbing and To eliminate pot holes, broken curbing, heavily cracked and
sidewalks.
failed roadway surfaces. To replace concrete sidewalks and
curbing that has deteriorated and damaged by snow plowing.
Conditions continue to deteriorate and the resulting safety issues
and concerns associated with them increases. Temporary
repairs by the maintenance department are no longer possible at
many of the sires. Some school drives, sidewalks and sections
of lots may need to be taken out of service very soon, if the
necessary restoration work is further prolonged.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
63,000
535,000
350,000
280,000
315,000
500,000
2,043,000
63,000
535,000
350,000
280,000
315,000
500,000
2,043,000
63,000
535,000
350,000
281,000
315,000
500,000
2,043,000
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
F-9
F-10
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION
1.
PROJECT TITLE: District Paving & Concrete
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $365,000________________
No _X _
Approved $100,000________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Department estimates using DPW unit pricing.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ X__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_$___________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Very Important.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Continued deterioration of asphalt and concrete parking lots, drives, curbing, sidewalks andwalkways.
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION
PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years
PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT FIRE ALARM SYSTEM (FA)
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015
RANKING: 6
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2019
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Replace current Fire Alarm Systems serving all district schools Current Fire Alarm Systems have exceeded their useful life and
and bring them to current code standards with a synchronized in need of replacement to an addressable system. A systematic
system.
approach to this project is in order to begin replacing systems
with obsolete parts. The need to replace all field devices and
head end processor is required to provide adequate life safety
support at each district school.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
2,000,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
2,000,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
2,000,000
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
F-11
F-12
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION
1.
PROJECT TITLE: District Fire Alarm System (FA)
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $____________________
Approved
No _X _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Cost estimates are derived by current day pricing & industry standards for a task of this size.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ X__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_$
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
______
No. of new positions __________________
Repeated need for service requests will be impacted in a positive way.__
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Current FA systems are plagued with obsolete equipment and are hard wired as opposed to addressable systems.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The district will continue to operate with FA systems that are not code compliant.
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION
PROJECT LIFE:
PROJECT TITLE: Jefferson E. S. Construction
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015
RANKING: 7
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2016
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
School Construction projects deferred until recommendations from Deferred School Construction Project.
Facility Utilization Study are complete. This study will help
determine what specific school construction projects are needed
based on enrollment and boundary lines.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction (includes
remediation)
357,500
7,948,920
8,306,420
357,500
7,948,920
8,306,420
357,500
7,948,920
8,306,420
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
F-13
F-14
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Jefferson E. S. Construction
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $____________________
Approved
No __ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_$
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
______
________________
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: BOARD OF EDUCATION
PROJECT LIFE:
PROJECT TITLE: Cranbury E. S. Construction
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/2015
RANKING: 8
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/2016
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
School construction projects deferred until recommendations from Deferred School Construction Project.
Facility Utilization Study are complete. This study will help
determine what specific school construction projects are needed
based on enrollment and boundary lines.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction (includes
remediation)
255,250
5,756,650
6,011,900
255,250
5,756,650
6,011,900
255,250
5.756,650
6,011,900
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
F-15
F-16
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT : BOARD OF EDUCATION
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Cranbury E. E. Construction
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $____________________
Approved
No _ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_$
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
______
________________
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
2015-16
REQUEST
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
188,000
70,000
45,000
2. Vets. Park Launch Ramps, Visitors
Docks
1,600,000
1,660,000
3. Brien McMahon Replacement Turf(main
field) new turf drainage
1,620,000
PROJECT TITLE
1. Vehicles
4.Cranbury Park/Gallagher Estate
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
350,000
1,600,000
900,000
400,000
400,000
5.Backstop/Fencing
50,000
50,000
50,000
30,000
30,000
6. Basketball/Tennis
165,000
70,000
100,000
7. Schools and Playgrounds
90,000
100,000
100,000
8. Fodor Farm Caretaker Apt.
40,000
9. Tree Planting
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
10. Open Space Fund
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
11. Rowayton Community Docks
50,000
400,000
12. Park Lighting Energy Savings
65,000
13. Parks Garage Paving of Lot
60,000
750,000
750,000
750,000
2,030
1,265
1,265
14.Oyster Shell Park
250,000
15. Master Plan of Parks
750,000
150,000
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
4,613
4,935
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 10+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Vehicles
SCHEDULED START: July, 2015
1
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
Toro Groundsmaster 5910
Toro Groundsmaster 300 4WD 72” Deck
V-Plow Mounting Kit
(1) 350 pick-up truck
(2) 250 pick-up truck
(2) 250 pick-up truck
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
$95,500 2015
$47,500 2015
$45,000
$70,000
$45,000
Currently we have only one piece of equipment that we use on
footpaths for snow, the new mower is equipped with a full v plow
and winterized cabin.
2015
2016
2017
Replacement of 22 year old pick- up truck
The Department had three working Toro’s currently only 2 are
working the other is providing parts for the 2 working
mowers.
Besides the garbage truck the large mowers
have the most hours of all equipment.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
194,000
188,000
70,000
452,000
194,000
188,000
70,000
452,000
194,000
188,000
70,000
452,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-1
G-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Vehicles
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _X__
Request $__Yes_____________________
Approved
No _ _
$194,000_________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
_Reduce Labor Costs
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
N/A
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Field Maintenance, Liability
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 25+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Veterans Park Launch
Ramp/Visitor Dock Replacement
SCHEDULED START: Oct, 2015
2
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: April, 2016
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Total rebuild of the Cities Launch Ramps and $1,600,000 2015-16 The current ramps are over 50+ year old. Current visitor’s
Visitors Docks.
docks do not meet current marine code for safety.
2nd phase of Master Plan $1,660,000 2017 (new Boating Center Currently the boating center is a former mobile trailer, new
Facility)
design would call for a full service boating center,
restrooms, showers, classroom, and office for staff.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
75,000
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
60,000
135,000
1,600,000
1,600,000
3,200,000
75,000
1,600,000
1,660,000
3,335,000
75,000
1,600,000
1,660,000
3,335,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-3
G-4
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Veterans Park Launch
Ramp/Visitor Dock Replacement
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $_75,000________________
No _ _
Approved $75,000__________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Consultant figures, based on cities needs for water access.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No x___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
_Yes commercial traffic
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_less repairs________
C. Additional Salary Costs
___N/A_____________
D. Additional operating expenses
___N/A____________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
_Reduce Labor Costs
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The public ramps are unusable during certain tides as well as unrepairable.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Closing the ramps for public use.
No. of new positions __________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 12+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Brien McMahon Jack Casagrand Field Re-Turf
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
3
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Sept. 2015
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement of Artificial Turf on Main Field, the $500,000 2015
existing turf is 10 years old and was only guaranteed for 8 years, the
field has to be replaced for safety of the users.
For safety and liability purposes field had numerous emergency repairs last
year to get by for the year.
The baseball and practice soccer field was $1,100,000 2015.
Designed for turf needs drainage and turf only.
Original design called for artificial turf and was designed for this application.
Project would extend the season and playability of the field since lighting is
already installed.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
20,000
20,000
1,600,000
1,600,000
1,620,000
1,620,000
1,620,000
1,620,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-5
G-6
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Brien McMahon Jack Casagrand Field Re-Turf
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $_______________________
Approved
No _ _
$__0________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Consultant for Field improvements and Turf Consultant
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No x___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
___N/A_____________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
__Yes less moving and maintenance_
C. Additional Salary Costs
___N/A_____________
D. Additional operating expenses
___N/A____________
Net effect on Operating Budget
No. of new positions __________________
_Reduce Labor Costs
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Main Field cannot be used for play, the baseball field will continue to be an issue with three sports playing from March – November making it
impossible to maintain to safety standards.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 30+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Cranbury Park/Gallaher Estate
SCHEDULED START: November 2015
4
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Engineering/Design
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Repair Exterior Masonry and Flashing
New Boiler
Electrical updates A/C, plumbing ADA
Addition for enclosed rental space
Trail Restoration
Trail Restoration
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: April 2016
$ 270,000
2015
$ 80,000
2015
$1,600,000 2016
$ 900,000
2017
$ 400,000
2018
$ 400,000
2019
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
Current building assessment recently completed indicates that the masonry must
be addressed so that we can preserve all internal finishes.
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
25,000
25,000
100,000
50,000
200,000
525,000
325,000
1,500,000
850,000
400,000
400,000
4,000,000
550,000
350,000
1,600,000
900,000
400,000
400,000
4,200,000
550,000
350,000
1,600,000
900,000
400,000
400,000
4,200,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-7
G-8
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE:
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes _x__
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Approved
$_550,000_____
Yes _ __
No ___
Request $___850,000_______________
No _ _
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Consultants
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_Less Repairs to interim surfaces
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
No. of new positions __________________
_Reduce Labor Costs
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Further deterioration of internal and external finishes to maintain the building standard for its National Historic designation.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 15+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Backstop/Fencing
SCHEDULED START: July, 2015
5
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June, 2016
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Replace existing perimeter fencing and safety fencing throughout Safety purposes and repairs
the park system $50,000 2015
Highlights * School perimeter fencing
Safety Fencing Ball Field, Out Field Fencing,
Backstop Marvin, Kendall
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
35,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
30,000
30,000
245,000
35,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
30,000
30,000
245,000
35,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
30,000
30,000
245,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-9
G-10
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Backstop/Fencing
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes X___
Request $__35,000_____________
Approved
No _ _
$_35,000_________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Current Contract
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
_____N/A___________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
_Reduce Labor Costs
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Potential liability from damaged fencing.
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE:
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Basketball/Tennis
SCHEDULED START:
6
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
West Rocks Tennis Court Resurface
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
$45,000
2015
Repair Roodner Court Basketball Court and Tennis Courts crack coat and seal
$85,000 2015
The purpose is to repair and resurface Sports surfaces in order to maintain safe
and quality venues.
Crack Coat and Seal damaged courts Around city $35,000 2015
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
165,000
70,000
100,000
335,000
165,000
70,000
100,000
335,000
165,000
70,000
100,000
335,000
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-11
G-12
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Basketball/Tennis
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes x___
Request $__94,000___________
Approved
No _ _
$_54,000__
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Current Contract Prices.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
____N/A___________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
_Reduce Labor Costs
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Courts closed not playable.
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE:
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: School & Playgrounds
SCHEDULED START: October 2015
7
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2016
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement Playground for Cranbury School $60,000
Classes
2015
Kindergarten
Replacement for age appropriate equipment at Cranbury School due to the
current age of the equipment.
Replacement of single piece of equipment from Vandalism or age around the city
$15,000 2015
Filer Chip replacement $15,000
2015
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
150,000
90,000
100,000
100,000
440,000
150,000
90,000
100,000
100,000
440,000
150,000
90,000
100,000
100,000
440,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-13
G-14
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: School and Playgrounds
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $_150,000________________
Approved
No _ _
$_150,000__
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
_Reduce Labor Costs
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Potential liability with equipment not meeting current standards.
No. of new positions __________________
No x___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 100+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Fodor Farm
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
8
x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2016
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Caretakers Cottage, plumbing, heating, sheetrock $40,000
insulation, structural work.
2015 Completion of the Historic Property in accordance with the State
Grant received and to prepare the property for the National
Registry.
Rental for the Caretaker’s Cottage with on-site supervision.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
40,000
40,000
100,000
40,000
140,000
100,000
40,000
140,000
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-15
G-16
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Fodor Farm
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $__100,000___________
Approved
No _ _
$_100,000_________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ x__
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
_No operating costs when completed, revenue for the city caretaker rent, main house costs
Paid by users
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
______x_________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
_
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Completion in accordance with State Grant.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
State requirements for grant request, the project must be completed.
No. of new positions _____0_____________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 20+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Tree Planting
SCHEDULED START: Fall, 2015
9
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: May 2016
_x NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Establish a tree-planting program including all Parks, School In order to undertake a reasonable tree maintenance program
Grounds, as well as municipal grounds
including replacement, park safety, and beautification funding
must be in place each year. We have had a tremendous amount
of Trees die over the past several years due to the stress from the
past years of storms.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
40,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
215,000
40,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
215,000
40,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
215,000
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-17
G-18
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Tree Planting
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes __x_
Request $__40,000_______________
No _ _
Approved $_40,000____
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
_Reduce Labor Costs
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Trees that have been removed will be replaced.
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE:
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Open Space Fund
SCHEDULED START:
10
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Establishing open space fund for the purpose of acquiring and On March 14, 2000 the Norwalk Common Council adapted an
securing open space.
amendment to the Norwalk code, creating the Open Space Fund.
The purpose of the Open Space Fund shall be to preserve or
create Norwalk’s Open Space and to protect its natural resources
by providing financial support for initiatives and activities that
primarily seek to preserve parcel of open space in perpetuity. The
Open Space Fund shall be used to acquire real property, payment
of acquisitions by non-for-profit organizations on payments
required to designate properties as open space.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
250,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
250,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
250,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-19
G-20
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Open Space Fund
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $__50,000______________
No _ _
Approved $_50,000_________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
_
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Money will not be in place for future open space purchases.
No. of new positions __________________
No x___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 30+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Rowayton Community Docks
SCHEDULED START: October, 2015
11
x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: April, 2016
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
To design for a new Seawall, ADA Accessibility as well as Floating The current condition of the seawall needs replacement as well as
Docks at the Rowayton Community Docks $50,000 2015
public access to the visitor dock and boat storage area.
Replacement of Seawall and Docks $400,000 2016
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
50,000
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
50,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
400,000
400,000
50,000
400,000
450,000
50,000
400,000
450,000
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-21
G-22
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Rowayton Community Docks
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $________________
No _x _
Approved $__0________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ x__
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
_Reduce Labor Costs
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Severe erosion caused by the past several storms have caused severe damage to the seawall, since the area is a public access ADA
accessibility is needed to the visitor docks.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 8+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Park Lighting Energy Savings
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
12
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2016
_x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Replace existing Light Bulbs with L.E.D. Full cut off bulbs. The Reduce the energy consumption for a savings as well as less
areas to be changed are Calf Pasture Beach, Shady Beach and maintenance to change bulbs since they last 6-8 years each.
Mathews Park.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
20,000
20,000
Equipment/Materials
45,000
45,000
65,000
65,000
65,000
65,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-23
G-24
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Park Lighting Energy Savings
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $_______________________
Yes ___
No _x _
Approved
$__0________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Price of fixture $325.00 per unit.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
_____x___________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
_Reduce Labor Costs
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Electrical consumption will continue to rise.
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 20+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Parks Garage Paving of Lot
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
13
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Aug. 2015
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Complete resurfacing of Parks Garage Parking and Storage lot Damage to equipment and drainage problems.
and driveway. Has not been done since the garage was
established in the 70’s.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
60,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-25
G-26
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Parks Garage Paving of Lot
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $__60,000____________
Approved
No _ _
$__0________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
_
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
No. of new positions __________________
No x___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 20+
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Oyster Shell Park
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
14
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: May 2016
x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
A shade structure (trellis) to complete Phase 1 of the project (project completed
Dec. 2012) Site Furnishings $250,000 2015
Phase 1 has just been completed (except for site furnishings and Trellis).
Suite Preparation, earth work, drainage, water, paving, lighting, furnish plantings,
Phase II $750,000 2016
Phase III
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
$750,000 2017
$750,000 2018
$750,000 2019
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
The Park is a direct link to South Norwalk from West Avenue.
Phases II and III will allow full usage of the park with potential for city revenue
through special events.
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
250,000
750,000
750,000
750,000
750,000
3,250,000
250,000
750,000
750,000
750,000
750,000
3,250,000
250,000
750,000
750,000
750,000
750,000
3,250,000
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-27
G-28
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Oyster Shell Park
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $__0_____________
No _ _
Approved $__________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _x __
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
__When Completed
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
_Part Time Temp__
D. Additional operating expenses
_Water, Electric, Police_
Net effect on Operating Budget
No. of new positions __________________
_50,000
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
With 95-7 on the horizon it is imperative that the City fund the next phases in the park especially for security and safety reasons.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks
PROJECT LIFE: 10 Years
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Master Plan of Parks
SCHEDULED START:
15
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Spring, 2016
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
A complete update of the Master plan of Parks and Open Space In order to access needs in the community the Master plan should
for the city.
The last update was in the mid 90’s. be updated every 10 years. When planning for future property
$150,000 2016-17
purchase as well as park infrastructure a current plan will create a
footprint for future development.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
150,000
150,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
G-29
G-30
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Recreation and Parks
PROJECT TITLE: Master Plan of Parks
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $____150,000____________
No _ _
Approved $__0________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
______x__________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
______x__________
C. Additional Salary Costs
_____x___________
D. Additional operating expenses
_______________
Net effect on Operating Budget
_
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Norwalk Public Library
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
1. Auditorium Soundproofing
18,000
2. Children’s Rooms Renovation
23,000
26,000
45,000
44,000
65,000
3. Newspaper Digitization Project
21,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
22,000
152,000
16,000
199,000
82,000
65,000
87,000
4. RFID Conversion & Implementation
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
62,000
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Library
PROJECT TITLE: LIBRARY AUDITORIUM SOUNDPROOFING
PROJECT LIFE:10 YRS
RANKING:
SCHEDULED START: 9/1/15
1
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
__ XREPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Auditorium in branch holds 120 people.
Install soundproofing padding in floor of branch library auditorium $18,000
The quote came from Valerio Giadone, one of the architects involved in the
renovation of the branch. His suggestion is that the existing carpet be
removed, provide soundproofing carpet underlayment and provide new carpet
above. Depending on the effectiveness of the soundproofing underlayment
additional sound deadening insulation may be installed below the ceiling at the
main floor level in the reading and computer areas.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:12/31/15
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
The branch was renovated in 2006, but the auditorium is in need of soundproofing
that did not take place during the renovation.
The auditorium is directly over the computer and reading room area in the front of
the library. Most movement in the auditorium can be heard on the first floor.
Especially when there is a children’s program in the auditorium, the noise is
deafening.
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Engineering
Construction
Equipment/Materials
18,000
18,000
25,000
25,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
25,000
18,000
43,000
25,000
18,000
43,000
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
H-1
H-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Library
PROJECT TITLE: LIBRARY AUDITORIUM SOUNDPROOFING
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes __X
Request $25,000_________________
No _ _
Approved $25,000_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Contractor estimate
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
We have been able to refurbish both auditoriums with video/data projectors, screens, speakers, microphones, and sound controls. We were
not able to cover the cost of the soundproofing at the branch in 2014-15, so we ask to complete the project with the soundproofing in 2015-16.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
We will continue to disturb the quiet for which people come to the library to study.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Library
PROJECT TITLE: CHILDREN’S ROOMS RENOVATIONS
PROJECT LIFE:
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/15
RANKING: 2
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/21
X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
__ XREPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
FY 2015-16 - $23,000
$8,000 to redesign the main library’s layout and $15,000 to finish the wall and ceiling
FY 2016-17 – 26,000
$15,000 for new activity room in the main library and $11,000 for lighting for the branch
For the past year in both buildings we had 396 programs for children ages birth - 2 with
7,769 in attendance; 594 programs for children ages 3 – 5 with 9,044 in attendance; 705
programs for children ages 6 – 11 with 6,611 children in attendance. This type of
attendance creates wear and tear on carpet and furniture. We can show our appreciation
to tax payers, parents/citizens with consistent upkeep and beautification of the rooms
FY 2017-18 - Window Treatments $45,000
$30,000 for the main library and $15,000 for the branch
FY 2018-19 Carpet and Window Treatments $44,000
34,000 for the man library and $10,000 for the branch
FY 2019-2020 Furniture and Shelving $65,000
$40,000 for the main library and $25,000 for the branch
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
8,000
TOTAL
8,000
Site Costs & Engineering
Construction
15,000
26,000
Equipment/Materials
41,000
45,000
44,000
65,000
154,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
23,000
26,000
45,000
44,000
65,000
203,000
23,000
26,000
45,000
44,000
65,000
203,000
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
H-3
H-4
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Library
PROJECT TITLE: CHILDREN’S ROOMS RENOVATIONS
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $_________________
Approved
No _X _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Vendor Estimates
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _X__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The main library children’s room was renovated in 1981. The delivery of children’s public services has changed since then. The branch library
renovation in 2004 stopped short of finishing the walls and ceiling and didn’t provide adequate lighting for the non-fiction room.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The implications would be further wear and tear of material s at the main library and continued deterioration of the walls at the branch.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Library
PROJECT TITLE: NEWSPAPER DIGITIZATION PROJECT
PROJECT LIFE:10 YRS
SCHEDULED START:7/1/15
RANKING: 3
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
$11k
$21k
$21k
$21k
$21k
$22k
(A) Norwalk Gazette (1818-1899)
1. South Norwalk Sentinel(1870-1909)
2. South Norwalk Sentinel(1910-1922)
3. South Norwalk Sentinel(1923-1932)
4. South Norwalk Sentinel(1933-1945)
5. Norwalk Hour [weekly](1872-1921)
Norwalk Hour [daily](1895-1909)
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 6/30/16
__ XREPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
20 reels 2014-15
49 reels 2015-16
50 reels 2016-17
50 reels 2017-18
50 reels 2018-19
13 reels 2019-20
44 reels 2019-20
PRIOR
YEARS
The Norwalk History Room developed a multi-year program to digitize Norwalk’s four major
historic newspapers. Digitizing these papers will both preserve them and enhance discovery and
access to them. The digitization involves running optical character recognition software over the
microfilm images, indexing this file, and placing it in a searchable database. In our case, the
State Library has offered to host our digitized newspapers as part of the “Connecticut Digital
Newspaper Project.” This alone will save thousands of dollars over time as hosting is a
continuing cost. They will also hold our master negatives in their climate and temperature
controlled vault in Rocky Hill, CT at no charge. We have started our project with the Norwalk
Gazette (1818-1899) because it is Norwalk’s oldest surviving newspaper, and the only news
title that we hold in actual paper. It is now very fragile. The city has included $11k in our
current budget to digitize the Gazette. Final bids were received this week. If all goes as planned,
the Norwalk Gazette will be fully searchable on the State Library’s newspaper site this winter.
We anticipate success and hope that all work is complete prior to our capital budget review. The
Norwalk Gazette is an important proof of concept statement for our newspaper project.
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Engineering
Construction
Equipment/Materials
11,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
22,000
117,000
11,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
22,000
117,000
11,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
21,000
22,000
117,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
H-5
H-6
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Library
PROJECT TITLE: NEWSPAPER DIGITIZATION PROJECT
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $_________________
Approved
No _ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
With the closing of the Norwalk Museum, the library has inherited the people who are interested in Norwalk’s heritage. Modern researchers
expect the information to be searchable online.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
People will have to use the outdated and hard to use microfilm and they won’t be able to perform key word searches without digitization.
Citizens will be reduced to searching for items in the library as microfilm is not available online.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Library
PROJECT TITLE: RFID
PROJECT LIFE:10 YRS
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/17
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:6/30/18
RANKING: 4
X__ NEW
CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
FID Year 1: Conversion, Circulation, Security. $151,900
Purchase tags, 300,000@ $.20--$60,000
Media hub tags 24,000 @ $.32--$7,680
Media full tags 10,000 @ $.80--$8,000
Rent conversion stations, 2/6months @ $3,200--$6,400
Purchase staff RFID pad/workstations 12 @ $1,985--$23,820
Purchase and install 4 self-checkout kiosks--$40,000
Allowance for data/electrical changes--$6,000
RFID technology allows for better inventory control and tracking of library
materials, plus self-checkout. 82% of public libraries plan to install self-checkout
machines, a process which is efficient with RFID.
RFID Year 2: Self check/self pay $15,200
Add auto-pay to self checkout stations, 4 @ $1,300 =
Allowance for data/electrical changes--$10,000
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
$5,200
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Engineering
Construction
Equipment/Materials
6,000
10,000
16,000
146,000
5,000
151,000
152,000
16,000
168,000
152,000
16,000
168,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
H-7
H-8
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
PROJECT TITLE: RFID
Library
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes __X_
Request 138,800$_________________
Approved
No _ _
$0_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
VENDOR ESTIMATES
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _X__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
RFID is the industry standard for inventory control and self-checkout.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
NPL may not be able to control losses or to implement self-checkout. The cost to implement the project may increase with each passing
year.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
2016-17
REQUEST
1. Mathews Park Buildings
40,000
2. LMMM Roof Leak Repair
216,000
3. Mill Hill ADA Master Plan
Implementation
94,000
150,000
100,000
100,000
4. New Museum at LH ADA Access
2017-18
REQUEST
15,000
2018-19
REQUEST
50,000
150,000
175,000
150,000
5. WPA Murals
25,000
15,000
6. Cemetery Conservation/Restoration
40,000
40,000
60,000
7. LMMM Improvement Project
25,000
60,000
225,000
150,000
8. Barn/Smith Street Buildings
10,000
100,000
9. Cemetery Site Work
10,000
10. Mill Hill Buildings
2019-20
REQUEST
250,000
20,000
10,000
10,000
225,000
11. Museum Collection Archive/
Cataloguing
10,000
10,000
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
560,000
660,000
440,000
440,000
435,000
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 75-100 years
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Mathews Park Buildings
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
1
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
2015/16 - $35,000 - Recreate Missing Porch/Temporary ADA Access
$ 5,000 - Replace leaking pipes in second floor walls
2016/17 - $15,000 - Replace portion of rear roof and flashing
2018/19 - $20,000 - Architectural plans for replacing slate roofs on Lodge
& Carriage House, recreate missing Belvedere on
Carriage House and ADA access
$30,000 - Demolish addition to Gate Lodge, build ADA ramps
2019/20 - $175,000 - Replace slate roofs on Lodge & Carriage House;
recreate missing Belvedere. ($150,000 matching
grant from state – total project $325,000.)
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2020
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Architectural Plans for rebuilding the missing Gate Lodge Porch were
completed in 2013. The missing porch has become a Public Safety issue
because of ice build-up in the winter and there is no ADA access to the
building. Future projects include restoring the slate roofs on the Gate
Lodge and Carriage House, as well as recreating the missing Belvedere on
the Carriage House, and permanent ADA access to the Gate Lodge to be
partially funded by a state grant.
2016-17
2017-18
Engineering/Design
2018-19
2019-20
20,000
TOTAL
20,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction/Restoration
40,000
15,000
30,000
175,000
260,000
40,000
15,000
50,000
175,000
280,000
40,000
15,000
50,000
175,000
280,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-1
I-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Mathews Park Buildings
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $42,000 (2015/16)____
Yes X___
Approved
No __ _
$40,000 (2015/16)_
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Costs are based on quotes for previous and related work.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
In addition to work on the LM Mansion itself, the other buildings that make up Mathews Park require ongoing maintenance, repairs and
improvements as part of the ongoing restoration work and are necessary for the ongoing preservation and care of the park buildings.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The proper care and maintenance of the Mathews Park buildings is necessary to prevent future damage or further deterioration of the
exteriors of these structures as well as preserve and restore the historic integrity of the buildings. Public Safety is compromised.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT TITLE: LMMM Roof Leak Repair
PROJECT LIFE: 25-50 years
SCHEDULED START: July 2013
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2016
RANKING:
_x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
2
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Architectural plans were completed in 2013 identifying solutions to
correct the leaks. The leaks stem from inadequate flashing, failed
caulking, necessary masonry re-pointing, and original design flaws
inherent in the building. A professional estimator estimated $466k in
repairs. The project is being broken into three phases over the three years.
The first and second phases ($250k) will be completed in January 2015.
We are requesting that the third phase ($216k) be completed in
2015/16.
The LMMM has developed significant leaks in the roof which require
immediate attention in order to preserve the integrity of the roof and
prevent additional damage to the mansion’s structure and interior. The
leaks are causing wood rot to the original structure as well as damaging
the priceless decorative painted ceilings originally created for the mansion
by famous 19th century designers and furniture makers the Herter
Brothers.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
250,000
216,000
466,000
250,000
216,000
466,000
250,000
216,000
466,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify) State Grant
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-3
I-4
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
PROJECT TITLE: LMMM Roof Leak Repair
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request ___216,000_____________
Yes _x__
No __ _
Approved $___216,000__________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Professionally Estimated.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
It is a long-standing policy of the City to provide public access to the waterfront and parks to the community and tourists. This project preserves
one of America’s Treasures as identified by the Federal Government and the City of Norwalk and saves it from further destruction and
deterioration, as well improving access in accordance with federal and state requirements. The restoration and upgrades will increase the
Mansion’s ability to provide programs, resources and to attract tourists to Norwalk and promoting the City as a significant tourist destination.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Continued damage that may become irreparable to the Mansion’s structure and priceless decorative painted ceilings.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 25-50 years
PROJECT TITLE: Mill Hill ADA & Master Plan Implementation
SCHEDULED START: Jul 2014
RANKING: 3
DESCRIPTION:
x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
2015/16 - $ 25,000 – Design and construction drawings for replacement of three sets of
stairs and sidewalks in front of the Town House; addition of a school bus pull-in on East
Wall Street
$ 69,000 – Asbestos abatement of office floor ($15k); Demolition of two
bathrooms and construction of a single ADA bathroom, relocation of kitchenette and new
floor ($40K); Relocation of electrical panel and rewiring ($6k); HVAC reconfiguration
($3k); Code compliant emergency lighting, smoke detectors, vapor barrier under main
room floor ($5k)
2016/17 - $150,000 – estimate for improvements specified in 15/16 construction
drawings
2017/18 - $25,000 - design and construction drawings for reconfigured parking lot and
entrance
$125,000 – estimate for improvements specified above
2018/19 - $150,000 – estimate for remaining master plan items implementation
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Jun 2019
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
_x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Norwalk students, residents and tourists visit Mill Hill Park. It is not handicap accessible
and must conform as part of the city’s public buildings. Mill Hill Park is the Wall
St./East Ave green space and is a vital element in the planned revitalization of the Wall
Street area. Exterior ADA access was added to the Town House, School House and Law
Office in 2014. However, the Town House restrooms are not ADA compliant.
Architectural plans have been completed but asbestos abatement will be required to
complete the restroom work. Front steps, stairs, and sidewalks are crumbling and
becoming a public safety hazard.
The Council approved a master plan for Mill Hill in 2011 that addresses these and other
issues.
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
25,000
2019-20
TOTAL
10,000
25,000
60,000
190,000
69,000
150,000
125,000
150,000
684,000
200,000
94,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
744,000
200,000
94,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
744,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-5
I-6
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
PROJECT TITLE: Mill Hill ADA & Master Plan Implementation
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request ________$94,000___
Yes _x__
No __ _
Approved $94,000___________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
The costs were part of the 2010 Mill Hill Historic Site Plan Report. The estimates were furnished by AKRP. The phases of implementation
have been defined by the Historical Commission. In 2013 a bid was issued and quotes came back confirming the original estimates.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
It is a longstanding policy of the City to provide public access to the waterfront for our residents and as a tourist attraction. The Mill Hill
Improvement and Green Space initiative is coupled with the Wall St Redevelopment project and will greatly enhance the pedestrian traffic flow
and parking in and around the Green, Wall St. and Smith St. This initiative will also significantly enhance Norwalk’s tourism capabilities and
expand the use of Mill Hill Park by making it ADA accessible and compliant.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The entire project and accessibility will be postponed. The city will not be on schedule to make its properties ADA compliant as directed. The
Historic site will be more difficult to access and will not contribute to the development of Norwalk. Public safety will be compromised,
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 25-50 years
PROJECT TITLE: New Museum at LH ADA access
SCHEDULED START: Jul 2015
RANKING: 4
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Jun 2017
x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
An architecture firm has been hired and is reviewing and designing necessary
ADA improvements to the Museum building and grounds.
The City is working with the Historical Society to create a new city museum
at the museum’s original location at the City Hall Complex.
2015-16 - $100,000 – phase I construction of ADA improvements, including
bathrooms, ADA access ramps and sidewalks
The City’s ADA Coordinator has identified numerous non-compliant ADA
issues with the old Lockwood House building next to the Health Department
at City Hall that needs to be addressed. Operating the museum at this
location will save taxpayers $1.8M over the next ten years. As a city-owned
public site, ADA compliance is necessary.
2016-17 - $100,000 – phase II construction of ADA improvements including
Elevator and basement level waterproofing.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
50,000
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
50,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
100,000
100,000
200,000
50,000
100,000
100,000
250,000
50,000
100,000
100,000
250,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-7
I-8
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
PROJECT TITLE: New Museum at LH ADA access
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $100,000
Yes X__
No __ _
Approved $100,000
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Current ADA Access is first floor only and is not compliant with current laws.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The City will have liability exposure for non-compliance with current ADA laws and requirements.
No _x__
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 50-75 years
PROJECT TITLE: WPA Murals
SCHEDULED START: Jul 2014
RANKING: 5
DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Jun 2018
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
The City of Norwalk WPA Murals collection is one of the largest and the finest
in the United States. Currently, some of the Murals are displayed in an unsafe
manner and require additional protection or relocation within City Hall. The
collection is a one-of-a-kind, irreplaceable set of paintings from the WPA
program.
2015/16 - $25,000 – conservation of Ben Franklin Murals
2016/17 - $15,000 – conservation of Concert Hall Murals
The Murals located at Ben Franklin School and the City Hall Concert Hall were
never conserved. The Ben Franklin murals have damage and are peeling from
the walls and require conservation. The Concert Hall murals varnish has
darkened significantly and requires conservation.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
12,000
25,000
15,000
52,000
12,000
25,000
15.000
52,000
12,000
25,000
15,000
52,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-9
I-10
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
PROJECT TITLE: WPA Murals
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request
Yes _X__
$12,300___
Approved
No __ _
_$12,000________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
The costs requested for 2014/15 were developed from a conditions assessment report by the Sylvester Group, LLC. The 2015/16 request is an
estimate based on past work with painting conservators. As is the 2017/18 request.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The WPA murals were restored over 20 years ago and have not been focused on since that time. The Arts Commission in conjunction with the
Historical Commission are working together to ensure the ongoing viability of the murals.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The murals could be damaged irreparably. The murals are a collection of national importance and are irreplaceable.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 75-100 years
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Cemetery Conservation/Restoration
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
6
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2019
x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
2015/16 - $ 40,000 – Restoration of 42 damaged headstones.
Pine Island is the largest of the four city owned historic cemeteries and needs
restoration to be a viable historic asset, tourist destination and adjunct to
Mathews Park & the LM Mansion Museum. This continues the State funded
conservation study from 2002 and work already implemented. Volunteers have
reset over 400 headstones. Volunteers have also done brush clearing, tree
trimming and plantings. The other three city-owned cemeteries are in good
condition and may only need repair from isolated damage. Cemetery care and
restoration has been an ongoing project for the Commission and has received
positive interest from the community and tourists. Continued work will greatly
enhance the safety, appearance and appeal to the public.
2017/18 - $ 40,000 – Conservation of 48 Colonial Brownstone tombstones
2018/19 - $ 60,000 – Restoration of iron fencing, roadways and installation of
interpretive signage
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
71,000
40,000
40,000
60,000
211,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
71,000
40,000
40,000
60,000
211,000
71,000
40,000
40,000
60,000
211,000
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-11
I-12
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Cemetery Conservation/Restoration
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request ______$35,000_______
Yes _x__
Approved
No __ _
$________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
These costs are based on recent cemetery stone restoration quotes and work that has been done in other cemeteries. The previous work has
been put out as an RFP and based on competitive bids as will future work.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
It is a long standing policy of the City to provide public access to Norwalk’s parks. Once stones begin to sprawl or break, they are at greater risk
of further damage from lawn mowers, vandals and neglect. Increasingly our historic sites and cemeteries are being visited by people searching
for information about their ancestors or by scholars researching Norwalk’s history and it’s relationship to the state and surrounding communities.
Restoration of Norwalk’s cemeteries has been a long standing City project that needs to continue. Pine Island is part of Oyster Shell Park,
Mathews Park and contributing to the Bike Trail.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The stones will incur further deterioration and in many cases, the names, information, and decorative elements that are part of our history and
culture will be lost as the stone chips and sprawls.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT TITLE: LMMM Improvement Project
PROJECT LIFE: 75-100 years
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2030
RANKING:
_x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
7
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
2015/16 - $25,000 – Critical rewiring needs
The City and LMMM non-profit have been working with the State and
preservation architects to preserve, conserve and restore the Mansion while
making it accessible and ADA compliant for over a decade. Funding through
State grants, the Mansion Board and the City of Norwalk have enabled work to
date, which includes new electrical service (to the panel only), ADA compliant
bathrooms and installation of an elevator. A master plan that includes the
upgrade of infrastructure systems (wiring, plumbing, code compliance, etc.) has
been developed with an estimated cost exceeding $7M to implement. The
LMMM Board will be raising significant funds through private donations and
grants but will need some city funds to make improvements to the building.
2016/17 - $60,000 – New sanitary sewer connection required by DPW
2017/18 - $225,000 – New ADA Ramp to first floor and basement egress
(assumes $150,000 additional from state grant)
2018/19 - $150,000 – Master Plan improvements
2019/20 - $250,000 – Master Plan improvements
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
33,000
TOTAL
33,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
110,000
25,000
60,000
225,000
150,000
250,000
795,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
143,000
25,000
60,000
225,000
150,000
250,000
853,000
REVENUE (Specify) State Grant
754,000
754,000
Previous Capital Budget
143,000
853,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
NET COST
(611,000)
25,000
60,000
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-13
225,000
150,000
250,000
(99,000)
I-14
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
PROJECT TITLE: LMMM Improvement Project
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request ________________
Yes _x__
Approved
No __ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
It is a long-standing policy of the City to provide public access to the waterfront and parks to the community and tourists. This project preserves
one of America’s Treasures as identified by the Federal Government and the City of Norwalk and saves it from further destruction and
deterioration, as well improving access in accordance with federal and state requirements. The restoration and upgrades will increase the
Mansion’s ability to provide programs, resources and to attract tourists to Norwalk and promoting the City as a significant tourist destination.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The building will not be in compliance with current ADA standards, compromising the Mansion’s programming and ability to secure future funding
that is dependent upon meeting current accessibility standards. Delayed funding will result in delayed progress, which will in the future.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 50-75 years
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Barn/Smith Street Buildings
SCHEDULED START: July 2014
8
x_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2019
x_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
2015/16 - $10,000 – Replace rotted sills on barn and additional siding
replacement.
2016/17 - $100,000 – Additional funds required to complete restoration of jail
and open to the public.
2018/19 - $20,000 – Insulate and rough enclosure of walls in barn, add
bathroom, and hvac.
The jail and barn are in the heart of the Wall Street re-development plan and
require extensive repairs and restoration. Extensive restoration work on the Barn
has been completed funded largely by FEMA funds after damage from
Hurricane Sandy, however rotted sill plates on two sides still requires repair.
The repairs to the jail after fire damage have been underway, funded from
insurance proceeds. Additional repairs and addressing extensive deferred
maintenance to properly restore the building for future use will require
additional funding beyond the insurance proceeds from the fire.
Requesting a $250,000 Urban Action Grant from the state in conjunction with
the Head of the Harbor project for exterior ADA access and hardscape
improvements around these two buildings in 2015.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction/Restoration
10,000
10,000
100,000
20,000
140,000
10,000
10,000
100,000
20,000
140,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
282,000
282,000
10,000
140,000
(272,000)
10,000
100,000
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-15
20,000
(142,000)
I-16
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Barn/Smith Street Buildings
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request _____0___________
Yes _x__
No __ _
Approved $______0______
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
The cost to repair and restore the Barn was derived from working with contractors and the City’s handyman to define the work and obtain quotes
in preparation for the budget request and/or insurance claims.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
This work is necessary to repair recent storm damage to the barn. In the event that the City’s insurance or FEMA claims are denied, the
Commission will need to fund the repair work.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The Barn structure is in jeopardy as the result of significant tree damage to the roof after a tree from the back side of Mill Hill fell on it during
Super storm Sandy. Damage to the roof, walls and interior support are required.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 25-50 years
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Cemetery Site Work
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
9
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: On-Going
_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_x REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
2015/16 – $10,000 - Repair of Stone Walls at Brookside Cemetery; tree removal
at Kellogg-Comstock Cemetery
Several of our cemeteries have historic stone walls that have not been
maintained and/or have been damaged by tree falls and require repair.
Additionally, the timely removal and pruning of trees is more cost effective than
to repair the damage incurred when strong storms result in downed trees or
branches. The last three major storms: Irene, Halloween 2011 and Sandy have
resulted in excess of $7,000 in damage to tombstones and additional damage to
city-owned buildings (the Barn $25K) and a private residence next to Brookside.
Extensive work was completed in 2013 at Mill Hill and Pine Island largely
related to storm damage. Additional work will be needed in the next five years
at Brookside, Kellogg-Comstock, Pine Island and Mill Hill.
2017/18 – $10,000 - Repair of Stone Walls at Pine Island Cemetery; tree
removal and trimming at Pine Island
2019/20 – $10,000 - Tree Removal and trimming at Brookside Cemetery and
Mill Hill Cemetery
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
25,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
55,000
25,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
55,000
25,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
55,000
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-17
I-18
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Cemetery Site Work
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request ___$10,000_____________
Yes _X__
No __ _
Approved $_______
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Based on quotes for comparable work at similar sites.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No x___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The site work at Norwalk’s cemeteries will ensure the protection of our historic assets and limit future damage that can be offset by this
preventative maintenance.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Based on recent weather trends and the impact on our local cemetery sites, we anticipate that Norwalk will continue to suffer
significant storm damage as trees are weakened by strong winds, ice or other storm damage. As a result, we expect significantly
higher expense to repair damage as it occurs rather than providing proper site maintenance and preventative care. Public Safety
is compromised.
.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 50-75 years
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Mill Hill Buildings
SCHEDULED START: July 2016
10
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2017
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
2016/17 – $150,000 – Complete repointing of the Town House with Lime based
mortar, repair and replacement of damaged brick.
$ 75,000 – Remove asphalt shingles and replace with historically
correct, fire-retardant cedar shingles; reconstruct original “yankee gutters” and
down spouts.
In 1962, the Town House was repointed using Portland Cement mortar, which is harder
than the non-fired bricks used in the construction of the Town House in 1835. Moisture
from the freeze-thaw process is causing the bricks to fail instead of the mortar. The bricks
are falling apart and will ultimately compromise both the structural and historic integrity
of the walls and building. Additionally, the cedar shingle roof was replaced with asphalt
shingles sometime in the 1970s or 80s, and the “yankee gutters” were covered up. The
roof is leaking, damaging the building and needs replacement. The lack of gutters is
causing moisture issues in the wood floors of the main room of the Town House. This
work is consistent with the recommendations made in our master plan of preservation
completed in 2010, which reviewed all of our historic buildings, including the Town
House. A matching state grant will be sought for partial funding of this project.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction & Restoration
22,000
225,000
247,000
22,000
225,000
247,000
22,000
225,000
247,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-19
I-20
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Mill Hill Buildings
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request _______________
Yes _x__
Approved
No _X_ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Based on quotes for similar work on other sites and past repairs.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The buildings at Mill Hill are currently used for educational programming and special events open to the public. Ongoing maintenance and
repairs are required to ensure the proper protection of these historic assets as well as public safety.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The buildings are in need of periodic repair of rotted wood, moisture damage and preventative maintenance in order to maintain and preserve the
buildings for public access and future activities. If these repairs and maintenance activities are not performed, the buildings will incur further
damage and deterioration.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Historical Commission
PROJECT LIFE: 75–100 years
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Museum Collection Archive/Cataloguing
SCHEDULED START: July 2016
11
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: On-Going
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
2016-17 - $10,000 – archival storage items and conservation services
The City owns a significant museum collection of objects including
paintings, furniture, pottery, china and other items valued at over $5M.
Proper care and conservation of the collection objects is critical to
preserving their value for future generations.
2018-19 - $10,000 – archival storage items and conservation services
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Furnishings
20,000
10,000
10,000
40,000
Other/Contingency – Consultant
33,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
53,000
10,000
10,000
73,000
53,000
10,000
10,000
73,000
33,000
REVENUE (Specify)
Previous Capital Budget
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
I-21
I-22
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Historical Commission
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Museum Collection Archive/Cataloguing
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request ________________
Yes x___
Approved
No __ _
$_____________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Amount is based on current hourly rates for qualified museum/archival consultant.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ___
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
________________
_____________________________________________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Before the collection can be safely and properly relocated, a catalogue of the objects and archives needs to be completed and items require proper
packing and storage. An experienced, qualified consultant will ensure that the proper care and procedures are followed to safeguard the collection
and archives for future use.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Without a proper inventory or catalogue of the collection and archives, any potential relocation would be significantly impacted, resulting in ongoing
fees and expenses to keep the collection in its current location.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency
2015-16
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
500
500
500
500
1,200
1,000
1,000
1,000
5. Bikeway Planning and Construction
250
250
250
250
6. Façade Improvements
160
160
160
160
200
200
2,110
2,110
PROJECT TITLE
1. Choice Neighborhood District
1,300
2. Public Art
2016-17
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
500
25
3. Affordable Housing
4. TOD Complete Street Improvements
7. North Water Street Lighting
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
1,325
2,610
1,910
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Choice Neighborhoods District
PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2019
RANKING: 1
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT X
REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
The infrastructure improvements in the Choice Neighborhood District identified,
engineered and estimated by Tighe & Bond include relocation of neighborhood
utilities underground and the removal of all utility poles, installation of historic
lighting, upgrading sanitary systems and storm water systems to improve area
drainage, raising roadbeds to reduce area flooding, granite curbing, concrete
sidewalks with decorative paving, street trees and pedestrian amenities. These
improvements are all in addition to the public improvements being required of the
proposed developers, both the Washington Village housing development as well
as proposed private development currently approved for the neighborhood. The
proposed final design and engineering has been completed for these
improvements so cited costs are for construction. The construction of these
improvements must be completed within 18 months of the project closing
anticipated to take place in the first quarter of 2015.
The Choice Neighborhood District in South Norwalk is the recipient of $30 million
in HUD Federal funding for the transformation of that neighborhood through the
replacement of the Washington Village public housing with a complex of mixed
income multi-family housing structures on that site as well as two other Day
Street sites. The Choice Neighborhood Plan also requires a substantial amount
of additional
infrastructure improvements not included in the proposed
development projects that have been identified, engineered and estimated by
Tighe and Bond to cost approximately $7 million. These public improvements are
not eligible for HUD grant funding. The State has committed $3.5 million from
Disaster Relief funds with a possible additional $1 million, but there still remains a
gap. The Agency will also be seeking Urban Act funds to support this need.
These infrastructure improvements are not only critical to support the immediate
Washington Village housing replacement project, but also are needed to enable
private development investment in both the near and long term to bring long
under-performing District parcels to higher and better uses.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
TOTAL
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
1,300
500
1,800
1,300
500
1,800
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
1,300
500
CAPITAL BUDGET
J-1
1,800
J-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Redevelopment Agency
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Choice Neighborhoods District
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ____
Request $__________________
Approved
No _X_ _
_$__________________
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Final design & engineering of public improvements completed by Tighe & Bond in 2014
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ____
No X___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
________________
No. of new positions __________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The public improvements requested are critical to support the Choice Neighborhoods Washington Village replacement project funded through the
HUD Federal funding and to enable future private investment in the District. These improvements are those currently not funded in the housing
development projects, but are partially funded through State funding support.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The Washington Village Housing development project will not obtain construction financing and will not be able to obtain Certificates of
Occupancy. The public infrastructure component of Choice Neighborhoods developments is not eligible for CNI grant funding.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Public Art
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
SCHEDULED START: July 2015
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Oct. 2017
RANKING: 2
_X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Capital Budget public art funding would be used to support the creation and
installation of public art in different mediums in public venues throughout the City.
These funds would also be available to leverage applications for grant funding
from both public and private sources. .
The Redevelopment Agency at the request of the Mayor’s South Norwalk Task
Force to provide funding for public art directly or to have funds available to
leverage as a match in application for grant funding. In fact, prior Capital Budget
public art funded was successfully used a leverage for a National Endowment for
the Arts grant of $50,000 for the Gateway to Norwalk West Avenue public art
installation currently in production and scheduled for installation in 2015. Public
art installations around the City of Norwalk enhance these spaces attract visitors
and improve the quality of the public environment.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Construction
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
25
25
50
25
25
50
25
25
50
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Federal & State grants
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-J3-
-J4-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Public Art
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $__25________________
Approved
No _ _
$__00
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Past experience with actual art installations
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
Public art is a recognized enhancement for public spaces attracting pedestrian traffic, visitor expenditures and improved quality of public space
experiences
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The City of Norwalk will not benefit from the real value of public art investments which benefit Norwalk residents and commercial businesses alike and
Norwalk will lack the available resources to seek public and /or private financial support for public art installations. .
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Affordable Housing
PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years
SCHEDULED START: July 2004
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2034
RANKING:
n/a NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
n/a REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
3
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
The Norwalk Redevelopment Agency is seeking capital budget funding to carry
out the provisions of the City of Norwalk’s Housing Strategy which was approved
by the Common Council in 2010. In FY15 the Agency will undertake a number of
activities related to the preservation of Norwalk’s affordable housing stock.
These activities will include but will not be limited to: the rehabilitation of existing
affordable housing units; financing mechanisms to foster homeownership among
low- and moderate-income households, preserve and extend existing affordable
housing deed restrictions, continued support of the Norwalk Housing Authority’s
Choice Neighborhoods Initiative to redevelop Washington Village/South Norwalk;
and the development and implementation of a pilot program that will support the
rehabilitation, responsible management and preservation of affordability of small
multi family properties around the South Norwalk Train Station.
The Affordable Housing activities undertaken by the Agency represent the key
means by which the City of Norwalk seeks to achieve the goals and objectives in
the Housing Strategy. This strategy underscores the importance of maintaining
Norwalk’s existing affordable housing inventory, particularly critical in light of the
implications of CGS 8-30g. Under this act, any municipality in which less than
10% of the housing stock is affordable to low- and moderate-income households
bears the burden of defending rejections of developers’ applications to build
affordable housing. The Agency’s affordable housing related activities are critical
to maintaining Norwalk’s existing supply of affordable housing, which is currently
11% of its total housing inventory. Moreover, the Agency’s affordable housing
activities are consistent with the Housing Strategy’s emphasis on the importance
of utilizing the financial resources dedicated to affordable housing in a cost
efficient manner. The aforementioned activities are considered by the Common
Council as both cost effective and appropriate investment strategies in meeting
the City’s objective of preserving its existing stock of affordable housing.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2016-17
TOTAL
Construction
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
2,820
0
500
500
500
500
4,820
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
2,820
0
500
500
500
500
4,820
2,820
0
500
500
500
500
4,820
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-J5-
-J6-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Affordable Housing
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $500,000______________________
No _ _
Approved $250,000________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
Agency’s cost estimate is based on actual cost of Agency’s previous years’ affordable housing activities and future plans.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _x _
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
5.
No. of new positions
0
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The Agency’s affordable housing related activities for which this funding is requested are essential to the implementation of the City’s Housing
Strategy which was approved by the Common Council in 2010. Affordable housing has consistently been cited as a “high priority” in the Agency’s
CDBG citizen participation process. Capital budget funding provides the Agency with a critical source of funds which it leverages with funding from
various sources including the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Connecticut Department of Housing (formerly Dept. of
Economic and Community Development), private foundations and other state and federal resources.
6. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The Agency’s affordable housing activities are critical to maintaining and growing the supply of affordable housing in Norwalk. If this program is
deferred or not funded, the City is likely to witness a significant loss in the number of affordable housing units, especially quality affordable housing
units. Without a corresponding addition of new affordable housing units, the loss would result in a drop in the percentage of Norwalk’s housing stock
that is deemed to be affordable, leaving Norwalk below the 10% threshold that allows its exemption from 8-30g.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
PROJECT TITLE: TOD Complete Streets Improvements
SCHEDULED START: July 2014
RANKING: 4
_X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:The highest priority pedestrian access
improvements include (a) the construction of a sidewalk on the east
side of the access drive to the South Norwalk Railroad Station
eastbound station (350’ with crosswalks) and (b) the improvements
to the two stairways (including stairway replacement, landscaping
and lighting) providing direct Station access from the terminus of
Clay Street and Hamilton Street in the Golden Hill neighborhoods.
The project also includes design and construction of bicycle
accessible corridors in the South Norwalk neighborhood connecting
to points feeding into the neighborhood. The design, engineering
and bid documents for these improvements are included in a
CTDOT TOD Pilot Program grant for complete streets design
scheduled to commence in 2013 and be completed in 2014 and in
a Sustainable Communities Initiative HUD Planning Grant also
scheduled to be completed in 2014. Capital budget assistance is
requested to construct these improvements.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Construction
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: Oct 2016
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION: The South Norwalk Railroad Station Area TOD
Strategy (approved October 2011) clearly identifies safe,
convenient and attractive “complete” streets access within the
South Norwalk station neighborhood as a key component to
maximizing the economic benefits of the transit center.
Improvements to critical pedestrian/bicycle access points is a
primary recommendation of the Master Plan to encourage area
walkability, decreases in traffic volumes in the neighborhood and
enhanced appeal for private investment in district residential and
commercial development.
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2016-20
TOTAL
1,360
0
1,200
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,560
1,360
0
1,200
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,560
Federal & State grants
686
0
500
500
500
500
2,686
NET COST
674
0
700
500
500
500
2,874
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
CAPITAL BUDGET
-J7-
-J8-
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: TOD Complete Streets Improvements
1. Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes _x__
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $__1,360,000________________
Approved
No _ _
$__1,360,000
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Construction costs are cost estimates provided by the CTDOT Pilot Program consultants, CDM Smith, based
on actual designs. Stair construction $600,000. Monroe Street sidewalk completion with crosswalks and light replacement $530,000, crosswalks and
sharrows $150,000.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
6.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The TOD Master Plan identified designed shared use of South Norwalk streets for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists as an immediate need. The
implementation of a program of “complete” streets is a high priority for both Federal and State investment. These improvements serve a significant
and growing neighborhood population to access the South Norwalk station and the mixed-income population demographic that the City is seeking to
attract.
7. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Pedestrians would continue to use access ways that are not safe and convenient or would choose to drive to the SoNo station. The South Norwalk
Station neighborhood would not be considered as walkable and/or bike friendly by the very population the City is seeking to attract. It would also be an
indicator that the City is not prepared to implement TOD Master Plan recommendations.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Bikeway Planning and Construction
PROJECT LIFE: 30 Years
SCHEDULED START: July 2016
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: June 2034
RANKING: 5
NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION
JUSTIFICATION:
Multi-year funding is requested for the redesign of existing street
networks to provide a variety of solutions for accommodating and
promoting safe and convenient bicycle traffic ranging from traffic
lane restriping, pavement markings, construction of dedicated bike
lanes, bike racks, cyclist facilities within transit stations and
appropriate signage throughout the network. Funding would also
be used for identifying, designing and constructing multi-use
bicycle trails within other public right of ways and parks to connect
the transportation network for all users.
Bicycle use in Norwalk is steadily increasing, both for commuting
and for recreational use. Several factors influence this shift
including increased environmental awareness, health and fitness
concerns and general attitudes regarding vehicle ownership
particular among younger Americans. “Complete Streets”, the
current benchmark in street design, is multi-modal seeking to
improve access and connectivity to all users, transit, vehicles,
cyclists and pedestrians, and is a tool to revitalize Norwalk’s
urban centers. The existing City roadway network with narrow
travel lanes and high volume of fast traffic demand flexible and
creative solutions to accommodate bicycles, a need clearly
identified in the approved Norwalk Connectivity Master Plan.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
TOTAL
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
250
250
250
250
1,000
250
250
250
250
1,000
250
250
250
1,000
Equipment/Furnishings
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
250
CAPITAL BUDGET
J-9
J-10
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT Redevelopment Agency
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Bikeway Planning and Construction
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ____
Request $__________________
Approved
No __ x_
_$__________________
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes ____
If yes, please estimate the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increased Revenue
Decreased Operating Expenses
Additional Salary Costs
Additional operating expenses
Net effect on Operating Budget
_________________
________________
________________
4. Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
No. of new positions __________________
No ___
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
PROJECT TITLE: Façade Improvements
SCHEDULED START: July 2014
RANKING: 6
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: October 2020
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__X REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Façade improvement programs, and closely related building rehabilitation programs, are usually
The revitalization of a neglected commercial district or residential neighborhood often begins with
developed and managed cities with a vested interest in civic improvement. The “Focus on Norwalk ”
improvements to a single building or storefront. Even simple changes such as the removal of non-
program is being created … as part of an overall redevelopment program to improve the quality of
historic materials, repairs, or a new paint job that calls attention to the building’s original
life n the urban corridor. The Program is designed to assist any property and business owners in
architectural details signal positive change and often stimulate similar improvements in
rehabilitating the commercial façades of their properties or any significant component of the
neighboring buildings. While this process sometimes begins spontaneously through the work of
streetscape impacted by their business for the purpose of creating a positive visual impact,
individual property or business owners, it can be significantly accelerated when a community
stimulating private investment, and complementing other community development efforts.”
creates a façade improvement program. As a result, such programs are frequently among the
implementing actions of comprehensive plans, downtown revitalization strategies, and historic
The eligibility criteria is open to both property owners and tenants with owner permission. The
preservation plans. Façade improvement programs are incentive programs created to encourage
related assistance is to be structured as both a loans and grants depending on the related
property owners and businesses to improve the exterior appearance of their buildings and
underwriting of the business expressing interest in the program and the scale of their improvement.
storefronts. They focus typically on either commercial or residential properties in historic or nonAll applications however will require a dollar for dollar match associated with the requested funding
historic areas and provide financial incentives such as a matching grant or loan and design
from the program. The maximum investment made by the program is capped at $15,000 for a grant
assistance.
and $30,000 for a loan. Loan are intended to be structured as principal repayment only. All
improvements associated with the program will require coordination with Agency staff and Agency
Façade improvement programs produce many benefits – including strengthening locally owned
design review approval
businesses which help keep dollars in the local economy.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Construction
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2015-20
TOTAL
160
160
160
160
640
160
160
160
160
640
10
10
10
10
40
150
150
150
150
600
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
Federal & State grants
NET COST TO CITY
CAPITAL BUDGET
J-11
J-12
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Façade Improvement Program
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes ___
Request $__________________
Approved
No _ X_
$__
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Comparative analysis of communities that are of a similar size to Norwalk and a review of the federal and state
grant awards for such programs as it relates to local match.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
7.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The funding remaining in the current Façade Improvement account is almost fully expended. There is a renewed political will to focus on the needs of
the businesses that exist within both SoNo and Wall Street and this type of investment is immediate in nature and has tangible returns. It was also a
recommendation that came out of the Agency’s SoNo Retail strategy as a means by which the area could be reinvigorated to attract more retail related
tenants.
8. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
Both Wall Street and SoNo will continue to struggle commercially and the immediate improvements to the physical environment of these areas that
could be realized by a façade improvement program will come more methodically through direct private investment. Such improvement may or may
not be considered visually beneficial.
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT LIFE: 20 years
PROJECT TITLE: North Water Street Lighting
SCHEDULED START: July 2013
RANKING: 7
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: July 2020
X__NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
The existing electrical connections have been mapped and
cleaned out identifying usable power sources and repairing old
sources that were damaged by Hurricane Sandy. Existing lighting
that has flooded has been removed. The design and
implementation of proposed lighting components would include
new bollard placements along the pergola sidewalk; wiring and
installation of lighting on the interior of the pergola seating area,
wiring and lighting on the waterfront deck covering the siphon
chamber and lighting on the landscaped island across from the
Aquarium. The intent of the lighting design is to create a safe and
comfortable outdoor gathering place for the neighborhood and for
Maritime visitors.
The seating areas along North Water Street adjacent to the
Maritime Aquarium at the start of the Heritage Park trail are very
attractive to the public and provide access to the Norwalk
riverfront. Lighting along the walkway, in the pergola structure and
even the street lights is either completely non-existent or not
functioning. As a result, the park-like environment that could be
an attraction for the neighborhood is unsafe after sundown which
prohibits neighborhood use of these public open spaces which is
the most effective deterrent against crime.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Construction
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
200
200
200
600
200
200
200
600
200
200
200
600
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
-J13-
-J14-
2012-2013
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT TITLE: North Water Street Lighting
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
$__200,000___________
If not, why is the project now included?
Yes _x__
Request $__200,000______________________
No _ _
Approved
2. How was your cost estimate derived? Cost estimates were derived from existing costs of electrical work to date on site, actual costs for lighting project
recently completed in South Norwalk and actual lighting designer proposals.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ __
No _x__
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
8.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project. South Norwalk is an extremely active destination for dining and entertainment. There is an increasing
residential population both anticipated and under construction. This creates a need for vigilance for public safety and concern for the attractive
condition of the network of open spaces in South Norwalk. Lighting is a critical factor in creating the safe, convenient and attractive streetscape that
the South Norwalk businesses require.
9. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded? The darkness of open areas along North Water Street at the start of the Heritage
Trail will be a deterrent to any public activity in those areas. Perceived and/or actual concern for personal safety renders the public open spaces along
the Norwalk River useless rather than being the environmental assets that they could be.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Information Technology
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
1. Citywide IT Projects
2. GIS
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
647,000
254,000
246,000
195,000
232,000
13,000
17,000
254,000
660,000
371,000
500,000
195,000
232,000
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Information Technology
PROJECT LIFE:
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: Citywide IT Projects
SCHEDULED START:
1
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
_X NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
DESCRIPTION:
City-wide technology and infrastructure projects encompassing Progressive capital innovations and enhancements to the City’s
City departments, Public Safety, Libraries, and Public Works.
data management systems, electronic service delivery, and
infrastructure are necessary to maintain the quality, integrity and
This request incorporates 17 capital technology projects across reliability of the City’s information system which enable City staff
City departments and organizations.
Public safety projects to efficiently deliver services to the public.
comprise $123,996; Library projects comprise $54,475; City wide
projects comprise $408,473.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
2,413,800
647,000
254,000
246,000
195,000
232,000
3,987,800
2,413,800
647,000
254,000
246,000
195,000
232,000
3,987,800
2,413,800
647,000
254,000
246,000
195,000
232,000
3,987,800
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
K-1
K-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Information Technology
PROJECT TITLE: Citywide IT Projects
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes __X_
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Approved
$_____________
Yes _ __
No ___
Request $________________________
No _ _
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
No. of new positions __________________
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Information Technology
PROJECT LIFE:
RANKING:
PROJECT TITLE: GIS
SCHEDULED START:
2
X_ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION:
_X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
JUSTIFICATION:
Large Format printer
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
To print large scale color maps, plans, aerial photography and
plans. Current model is approaching 10 years of age and
exhibiting signs of age. Replace before parts and supplies
become obsolete.
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
65,500
13,000
17,000
254,000
349,500
65,500
13,000
17,000
254,000
349,500
65,500
13,000
17,000
254,000
349,500
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
K-3
K-4
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Information Technology
PROJECT TITLE: GIS
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes __X_
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Approved
$_____________
Yes _ __
No X___
Request $________________________
No _ _
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
________________
4.
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
5.
What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
The printer will eventually stop working.
No. of new positions __________________
12/10/2014 Information Technology 2015 2016 Capital Budget Request Detail
Requested By:
Project / Initiative
City-wide
Website Enhancements
City-wide
City-wide
City-wide
Desktop and Printing Technology Refresh
Consolidated Server Refresh
Enhanced security software for desktops and servers
Doc Mgmt system, scanning and indexing (all depts)
City-wide
PC and phone distribution switch replacements (c 2006)
City-wide
City-wide
Risk Assessment/Vulnerability Testing
GIS
Large format printer
GIS
Recreation and ParksEnhanced weather camera for beach license plate reader
PUBLIC SAFETY
Video storage
Police
Police
PC and phone distribution switch replacements (c 2006)
Police
Mobile Data Terminals in Patrol vehicles
Police
2-layer authentiction for MDTs (CJIS requirement)
911 Recording system enhancements (verint)
Dispatch
Self-check out kiosk
Library
Library
Sierra database upgrade server
Library
Public Access Computer Refresh
Health
Environmental Software Replacement
Sub Total
Offset
Grand total
City Wide requests + all others
GIS requests
Library requests
Public Safety
Health Dept
Page 1
Priority
2015-2016
Comments
Critical
$50,000
Critical
Critical
Critical
$91,173
$16,500
$29,800
High
Critical
Critical
$150,000
$24,000
$35,000
front end re-branding consistent with Norwalk Econimic development and
Continuing to refresh PCs and printers for City Hall, Fire, Police, the Libraries,
Public Works
Refresh of five year cycle
Strengthen existing products - multilayer approach
Moved in from DPW budget request. Includes old drawings, maps, index cards,
documents, etc
Original to building rewiring - circa 2005
Assess infrastructure and process risks. Formulate recommendations and
High
High
$13,000
$12,000
printing large scale color maps, aerial photos from GIS; current printer 2007.
better high/low light reading.
Critical
Critical
Critical
Critical
Critical
High
Critical
Critical
Critical
$4,000
$25,176
$46,320
$25,000
$23,500
$10,000
$23,000
$21,475
$60,000
Ongoing addition to meet video retention requirements
Original to the PD building. Starting to show signs of port failure
Continuation of refresing 12 units per year
Password plus a device or finger print. Mandated for CT.
Turn-key solution from vendor. To support E911 text, video, email. Last upgrade
Initial project, if successful, will add another kiosk next year.
Current server approaching end of life
Revolving schedule to refresh a portion of the public access computers each
current software unreliable; company in financial difficulty.
$659,944
2016-17
2017-2018
2018-2019
$10,000.00
2019-2020
2020-2021
$10,000.00
$85,000.00
$16,500
$85,000.00
$16,500
$25,000.00
$85,000.00
$16,500
$25,000.00
$24,000.00
$25,000.00
$12,000.00
$25,000.00
$85,000.00
$16,500
$25,000.00
$85,000.00
$16,500
$13,000.00
$4,000.00
$25,176.00
$46,320
$46,320
$4,000.00
$46,320
$46,320
$46,320
$23,500.00
$10,000.00
$21,475
$21,475
$253,471 $245,295
$21,475
$23,000.00
$21,475
$21,475
$194,295 $231,295 $205,795
$659,944
$408,473
$13,000
$54,475
$123,996
$60,000
$659,944
Page 1
Capital Requests IT 2015 2016 final version
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Health Department
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
1. Oil Tank Replacement
30,000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
30,000
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: Health
PROJECT TITLE: Weights and Measures Oil Tank
Replacement
PROJECT LIFE: 30 years
SCHEDULED START: 7/1/15
RANKING: critical
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: 7/1/45
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
X_ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement of the oil tank and trailer used by the Sealer of
Weights and Measures. The tank and trailer were stolen from
the City Health parking lot in November 2014.
This is a State mandated activity.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
Engineering/Design
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
CAPITAL BUDGET
L-1
L-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
PROJECT TITLE: Emergency Notification
Health
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
Yes ___
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Approved
$_____________
Yes _ __
No _x__
Request $________________________
No_x _
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
________________
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
No. of new positions __________________
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
The oil tank trailer was stolen from the City Hall parking lot and has not been found. In order to conduct the state mandated inspection of oil trucks, a
new tank must be purchased before the 2015 heating season.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
There are 14 oil companies doing business in Norwalk. Currently there are 67 trucks tested for accuracy of meters and the revenue generated from
the inspections is $5,025 per year. If not funded, the oil trucks doing business in Norwalk cannot be inspected, the amount of oil sold may be
inaccurate and there will be a revenue shortfall of at least $5,000.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Human Relations
2015-16
REQUEST
PROJECT TITLE
1. ADA Compliance
2016-17
REQUEST
2017-18
REQUEST
2018-19
REQUEST
2019-20
REQUEST
345,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
345,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
TOTAL
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT: HUMAN RELATIONS AND FAIR RENT
PROJECT LIFE:
PROJECT TITLE: ADA Compliance
SCHEDULED START:
RANKING:
SCHEDULED COMPLETION:
__ NEW CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT
__ REPLACEMENT\REFURBISHMENT
DESCRIPTION: See Attached project by project estimate
JUSTIFICATION: As a public entity, the
City should strive to have all its programs and
service accessible to all its residents who wish to
participate.
Request to further the City’s work to comply with our Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance and Transition Plan. Abatement of an additional
thirty-six (36) of the two hundred and twenty-two (222) identified barriers to the public’s access to municipal programs (see attached excerpt from
the City’s ADA Compliance and Transition Plan).
In addition, there are legal considerations and
liabilities. The American with Disabilities Act
requires that we make our programs and services
accessible to persons with disabilities.
This request includes substantial upgrades to accessibility in City Hall including emergency egress routes, way-finding signage to entrances and
accessible restrooms, some work to make restrooms accessible, and following up on our requests from last year to design assisted listening systems
in major public meeting rooms, this year we are requesting funding to implement those designs. We are also looking to expand our assisted
listening program to meeting rooms used by the public and the public schools on the third floor of City Hall and at the Police Station. We are also
seeking funding for curb cuts at various public buildings and to extend handrails that are non-compliant in various places around the City.
Norwalk is playing catch-up with its ADA
responsibilities and is therefore obligated to take
substantial steps towards the completion of the
projects outlined in the City’s ADA Compliance
and Transition Plan. Under the ADA the City
must correct violations of the ADA unless to do so
would impose “an undue administrative or
financial burden” on the City.
We also request funding to implement building access projects that are in queue for design now at Jefferson, Columbus, and Norwalk High School.
Finally, we request additional funding for ADA Accessibility work at the Senior Center. Although the Senior Center is operated by a nongovernmental entity, it is housed in a building owned and maintained by the City and is a program substantially funded by the City. Importantly,
many municipalities provide similar services as part of a core municipal program. These projects include substantial work to make the bathrooms
accessible and to design assisted listening systems for three rooms in which public programs are run.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE
(000's)
Engineering/Design
PRIOR
YEARS
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
TOTAL
58,000
15,500
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
213,500
442,000
329,500
315,000
315,000
315,000
315,000
2,021,500
500,000
345,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
2,245,000
Site Costs & Acquisition
Construction
Equipment/Materials
Other/Contingency
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
*Although not calculated yet, the state will partially reimburse education related expenses.
REVENUE (Specify)
NET COST
500,000
345,000
350,000
CAPITAL BUDGET
M-1
350,000
350,000
350,000
2,245,000
M-2
2015-2016
CITY OF NORWALK
DEPARTMENT :
1.
Human Relations and Fair Rent
PROJECT TITLE: ADA Compliance
Was this project included as part of last year’s five year capital plan?
If yes, please indicate amount requested and approved.
If not, why is the project now included?
Request $382,000_____________
Yes _X_
Approved
No _ _
$250,000__
2. How was your cost estimate derived?
The estimates for curb cuts were obtained from DPW personnel familiar with similar projects. Estimates for doors, signs, and paths were obtained
from the Building Department. Estimates for park projects obtained from Recreation and Parks Department. Some estimates for design and construction
related to bathrooms, dressing room, and seating in the Concert Hall were obtained from Gill & Gill Architects, LLC. Estimates for assisted listening
system implementation were provided by JaffeHolden. Estimates for design of future assisted listening systems were based on prior similar contracts.
The estimate for the implementation of Board of Education projects was roughly estimated by Human Relations and Fair Rent Department staff.
3.
Will this project have an impact on the operating budget of this department or another department?
Yes _ X_
No ___
If yes, please estimate the following:
A. Increased Revenue
Some of the projects will bring in additional capital funding based on the State’s partial
reimbursement of capital expenses related to education.______________________
B. Decreased Operating Expenses
________________
C. Additional Salary Costs
I have requested 22,000 for a part time (2/5) project manager for ADA and other projects
D. Additional operating expenses
________________
Net effect on Operating Budget
4.
________________
Comment on the demand/need for this project.
As noted above, this project will make our municipal programs and services more accessible to our residents who have disabilities as required by
federal law.
5. What are the implications if the project is deferred, or not funded?
A less welcoming city to people with disabilities, greater risk of injury on city property for people who are infirm or have disabilities, and increased
liability of federal action.
1/13/2015
City of Norwalk
Recommended ADA Transition Projects 2015-16
Dept.
ID#
Estimated
Cost.
Description
Notes
Provide 1 new set of compliant doors.
Building
Mngmt
1.1.4P
Emergency egress from Community Room. Non
compliant doors.
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
1.1.6;
1.1.17
City Hall: Wayfinding Signage from public
transportation and parking to City Hall and
Concert Hall (Accessible Route)
$5,000 Locations have been determined.
1.1.8
City Hall: Create Directory of Access Services
and Resources
$5,000 Determine content and location.
1.1.10
City Hall Elevators: No audible Signals
If the elevator is not capable of generating audible
$1,000 signals, we do not have to make it so. Building
mgmt is finding out the status.
1.1.18
Concert Hall Restrooms: Substantial renovations
to make accessible
$1,000
1.1.19
Concert Hall: Non-Compliant Handrails on Stairs
to Balcony
1.1.21P
Concert Hall Stage: stairs on emergency egress
route have a non-compliant handrail.
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
$
Page 1
8,000
Install signage in rear lobby & concert hall
indicating accessible restrooms in City Hall atrium.
$14,000 Design and implementation.
$2,000
Install compliant handrail on one side and correct
non-compliant handrail on other.
1/13/2015
Recommended ADA Transition Projects 2015-16 (page 2)
Estimated
Cost.
Dept.
ID#
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
1.1.23P;
1.1.24P;
1.1.25P
Additional Wheel Chair Accessible Seating in
Concert Hall and other upgrades. Design &
implementation.
1.1.22P
Emergency egress from Concert Hall. Non
compliant doors.
DPW/
Building
Mngmt
1.1.26P;
1.1.27P;
1.1.28P;
1.1.29P
Concert Hall Dressing Room: Correct threshhold,
redesign and renovate bathroom to accessibility
$
standards
IT/BOE
N/A
IT/Police N/A
Description
$10,500
$
Install ALD system in BOE Rooms: 300A, 330,
and 333.
Design ALD systems for Police HQ Community
Room, Press Room, and Chief's Conference
Room.
$
Notes
Additional 6 wheel chair spaces for $2,500 and
$8,000 for handrails on outer aisle side walls.
16,000 Provide 2 new sets of compliant doors.
8,500
Design & implementation to bring facilities into
compliance.
30,000 Implimentation in process.
$
7,500 Design in process.
Main
Library
2.2.2P
No curb ramp and curb cut at head of access
aisle.
$
Connect handicap parking spaces to walkway with
2,000 ramps/curb cuts.
Police
Hdqtrs
1.2.3P
Access route from parking to bldg entrance
interrupted by a curb.
$
2,000 Construct curb cut.
$
2,500 Conference room is occassionaly used by the public.
$
1,000 Install grab bar.
$
4,000 Install two curb ramps.
Police
Hdqtrs
Police
Hdqtrs
Yankee
Doodle
Garage
1.2.4
1.2.5P
1.7.4
Install additional handrail in stairwell to
Conference Room on 3rd floor.
Police HQ holding cell for handicapped requires
a grab bar for toilet.
No curb ramps at Burnell Blvd. entrance.
Page 2
1/13/2015
Recommended ADA Transition Projects 2015-16 (page 3)
Dept.
ID#
Estimated
Cost.
Description
Notes
Recs &
Parks
3.4.13P
Mathews Park: Deteriorated walk at entrance to
playground.
Recs &
Parks
3.5.12;
3.5.13;
3.5.14;
3.5.15
Cranbury Park: construct accessible routes
(several). Route from main parking lot is CC.
Others to be done.
1.5.2P
Ramp on route to elevator requires handrails.
Slope occassionally minorly exceeds 8.3%
$1,500 Install handrails only? Or address slope?
1.5.3P;
1.5.4P
Stairs to ticket counter and platform need
handrail extensions
$3,000 Design and install extensions.
1.5.5
Stairs to Café have non-compliant handrails
$3,000
DPW?
Sono
Station
DPW?
Sono Sta.
DPW?
Sono Sta.
$5,000 Repair the walk.
$40,000
This is for additional funding for the others that
need to be done.
Design and correct non-compliant partial handrail
and install additional handrail.
With pending design projects for the entrance at
Columbus and an egress at NHS (near the pool),
some funding should be set aside for
implementation of these projects
Without the BOE's cost estimates as part of their
design work authorized in 2013-14, it is difficult to
estimate the cost of these projects. However, to
$75,000 leave them out of the plan for 2015-16 would
hamper the City's ADA efforts as projects at the
schools are a major component of our unresolved
ADA compliance projects.
Senior
Center:
Allen Rd.
Design and implement compliant Women's and
Men's restrooms.
$50,000
Senior
Center:
Allen Rd.
Design and implement Assisted Listening
Devices in 3 rooms: A, B, Gym, plus a mobile
system for smaller meetings.
$47,500 Design $7,500. Implement $40,000
BOE
4.6.7;
4.7.2;
4.3.6
ESTIMATED TOTAL
$
Page 3
345,000
Survey of non-compliance completed. Design and
implementation to follow.