“Evidence that Demands a Verdict” Series Sponsored by DISCIPLES OF THE CROSS - CCNY Andrew N. Smellie, B.S., M.H.A. Cornell University ‘01, ‘03 Lead Evangelist New York City International Christian Church Apologetics – Defending Christian Evidences Science & Religion – Friends or Enemies? ◦ Errors of extreme views – scientific or religious! Evidence for a Creator ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ The Origin of Universe and Life! The Design of the Universe - Anthropic Principle Irreducible Complexity Biological Storage of Information - DNA Summary What is Your Verdict? “Apologetics” – (Greek) - > “Apologia” ◦ Originally used in ancient Athens as a “speech of defense or vindication” ◦ Specifically made in a courtroom as part of normal judicial procedure. Defendant allowed to refute charges with a “defense” (apologia) ◦ In the 2nd century this general word for “defense” began to refer to defending the beliefs and practices of Christianity What is it today? Christian (1 Peter 3:15) Persuasion (Acts 17:2-4) Science (Isaiah 40:22, 55:10, Job 26:7) Art (1 Corinthians 9:19-22) ◦ The Science and Art of Christian Persuasion! ◦ Jesus is Lord and the people need to examine the truth! ◦ We are called to persuade others like Paul did! ◦ Study of archeology, astronomy, medicine, & physics! ◦ Building loving relationships with people that will break down the roadblocks of pride, sin, and false beliefs through discussion and challenges! To deepen our love for God and our neighbors (Matthew 22:37-38)! ◦ We need to love God with all our “mind”! To prepare us to answer the claims of the world (1 Peter 3:15-17)! ◦ We need to be confident about the basics! To protect our brothers and sisters in the church from false doctrine (Acts 20:3031)! ◦ Even disciples of Jesus in the past have mistakenly distorted the truth! “The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good. The Lord looks down from heaven on the sons of men to see if there are any who understand, any who seek God. All have turned aside, they have together become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one.” –Psalm 14:1-3 Science & Religion: Friends or Enemies? "I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know his thoughts; the rest are details." -- Albert Einstein, “A Talk with Einstein” (1955) (The Listener 54, p.370-371) Bacteriology Calculus and Dynamics Celestial Mechanics Electrodynamics Electromagnetism Gas Dynamics Genetics Louis Pasteur Sir Isaac Newton Johannes Kepler James Clerk Maxwell Michael Faraday Robert Boyle Gregor Mendel Atheism vs. Creationism The Atheist’s view of nature can be explained as follows: “Every event which has ever occurred or ever will occur in the universe can be explained by the laws of nature.” The Creationist’s view of nature can be summed up as follows: “The universe is a few thousand years old. The preponderance of known scientific facts are in agreement with this claim.” Not every scientist is an atheist and not every Bible-believer is a creationist. Minority positions, merely the extreme ends of the spectrum. Neither is well supported by science. What are the positions of the atheist and creationist on the origin of the universe? Atheism “In the universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt and other people are going to get lucky: and you won’t find any rhyme or reason to it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at the bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good. Nothing but blind, pitiless indifference. DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is, and we dance to its music.” -- Richard Dawkins A River Out of Eden, 1995 Creationism First day of creation: Sunday 23 October 4004 BC Published 1650 O.T. genealogies end-to-end James Ussher 1581-1656 Irish Archbishop & ViceChancellor of Trinity College in Dublin “Mutations” supply the new raw “Natural selection” retains the material mutations which provide a reproductive advantage All life (plant and animal) has derived from a common ancestor YET Darwin also stated: “I cannot look at the universe as a result of blind chance.” – “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection” – 1859) This theory does not explain HOW life got here, but rather is a proposed mechanism of development. The word “evolution” is used in different ways - one true, the others not “Micro-evolution” – Life forms have developed and diversified into new life forms. Gradual changes within a kind of animal (Ex: several generations of dogs “Macro-evolution” – Life arose from non-life. All life forms change from simple to complex organisms. Gradual change from one kind of animal to another (Ex: from fish to amphibian to reptile - is “a research topic”) Evolution is a proposed mechanism for life. It doesn’t explain how life began! Evolutionary biologist and historian William Provine of Cornell University said that if macroevolution is true, then there are five inescapable conclusions: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ There’s no evidence for God. There’s no life after death. There’s no absolute foundation for right and wrong. There’s no ultimate meaning for life. People don’t really have free will. Radical concessions from an ardent Darwinist! (Darwin on Trial, 2nd Edition – Philip Johnson, 1993) Basically only two choices: ◦ God exists and He created us ◦ There is no God, so natural processes must explain how we got here The appeal of evolutionary thought: it provides a way for people to justify to themselves that there is no God, so they can live and do as they want 1st & 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (1st) “In a closed system, the sum of mass and energy is conserved.” (2nd) “For any spontaneous process in a closed system, entropy increases.” – What does that mean in Laymen’s terms??? Mass & energy can be interconverted but not change (ex: Gasoline in your car – E=mc^2) With the absence of “supernatural intervention”, the universe will run down completely. Order leads to disorder! Assumption: The Universe Exists Therefore, the Universe has either: 1) Always Existed OR 2) Not Always Existed In other words, the universe has either 1) Not Been Created OR 2) Been Created FACT: The Universe Exists Beginning Caused Personal (i.e. Creator) No Beginning Uncaused Impersonal Since the universe could not create itself, there must be some sort of Creator! “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the works of his hands.” ◦ Psalm 19:1 “The heavens proclaim his righteousness, and all the peoples see his glory.” ◦ Psalm 97:6 Universe began 15 billion years ago Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago Life began 3.5 – 4 billion years ago Homo Sapiens began 250,000 years ago Would the explosion of a building cause complexity or randomness? Entropy (disorder) would increase! Question for atheists: What caused the Big Bang explosion? Assumption: Life Exists Therefore, life was either: 1) Created OR 2) It Just Happened Which implies either: 1) There Is A Creator OR 2) There Is No Creator • • • Created or Not Created? Questions to Keep in Mind: How did life originate from non-life? How did complex order originate from disorder? How did complex information originate from noninformation? All Living things are composed of: • Proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and lipids. • Carbohydrates require a strong oxidizing (oxygen) atmosphere and amino acids require a strong reducing (hydrogen) atmosphere. Logical opposites!!! • How could life have randomly started if the atmosphere to begin life required completely different atmospheres? ? Non-Life ? Life Highly Developed Life • Fact: Appearance of first bacteria and algae 3.5 - 4 billion years ago (from fossil finds). • Fact: Earth about 4.5 billion years old • Very little time (geologically) for the earth to cool and the first cell to arise and “evolve”. • Scientists have postulated that nature would need around a billion years for this to the cell to evolve after the cooling. • One answer to this problem… • PANSPERMIA! • LIFE CAME FROM OUTER SPACE Directed panspermia: intelligent life used space travel to colonize Earth - Francis Crick (1916-2004) Icarus, 1973 • Darwinists have no plausible answers to these problems • Everything points to “NON-NATURALISTIC INTERVENTION”! (another word for a MIRACLE) Anthropic Principle: Physical Constants of Universe Others are: Parent Star Constants (7); Elemental Constants in Atmosphere (7) Constants Which Had to be Just Right For Life Constant A Little Bigger A Little Smaller Gravitational constant very short-lived stars no stars Strong Nuclear Force no hydrogen, fusion only hydrogen Weak Nuclear Force all H2 He at big bang no He at big bang no heavy elements Electric Force no chemical bonding no chemical bonding … • At least 55 distinct parameters, probability: 10-69 • Maximum possible number of planets in universe: 1022 • Much less than 1 chance in one hundred billion trillion trillion exists that even one such planet would occur anywhere in the universe Argument from Design: Teleological Argument The universe (life) clearly has design and purpose displayed within it. The best explanation for design and purpose is an intelligent designer. Therefore, the universe (life) is the result of an intelligent designer. Natural Theology, 1800 William Paley 1743 –1805 The Big Bang was Fine-Tuned! •When the universe was one second old, its rate of expansion had to be exactly the right value to within 0.000000000000001% How precise? Drive your car @ 60 mph for 40 years around the Earth 21,024,000 miles (800 times) (without moving off track by one hair width – 15 microns) “Here is the cosmological proof of the existence of God – the design argument of Paley – updated and refurbished. The fine tuning of the universe provides prima facie evidence of deistic design. Take your choice: blind chance that requires multitudes of universes, or design that requires only one… Many scientists, when they admit their views, incline toward the teleological or design argument.” -- E. Harrison Masks of the Universe, 1985 • The strength of gravity must be within .000000000000000000000000000000000000 01% in order for life to exist in the universe • Stronger gravity inconsistent sun burning Weaker gravity not enough metal Two Types of Order 1. Order without information • • • Example: Snowflake Dendritic growth is an inherent property of water No creator needed 2. Order with information • • Example: Mt. Rushmore vs. Old Man of the Mountain Intelligent cause needed Life Zone Larger Star: Rapid, unstable burning Smaller Star: Planet’s rotation period is too long Sir Fred Hoyle: The likelihood of a cell forming by chance is the same as a “tornado sweeping through a junk-yard and assembling a Boeing 747 from the material within.” Dimes up to the moon on 48 billion Earths! Fine-tuning Over 200 parameters had to be fine-tuned for life to exist in the universe. •The odds are one chance out of 10237 = 0! •That is like flipping a coin and getting tails 787 times in a row! “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” --Charles Darwin Origin of Species, 1859 The survival of the fittest does not explain the arrival of the fittest Bombardier Beetle H2O2 reservoir Hydroquinone reservoir Inhibitor Anti-inhibitor Schematic diagram of the "irreducibly complex" human eye 1:posterior chamber 2:ora serrata 3:ciliary muscle 4:ciliary zonules 5:canal of Schlemm 6:pupil 7:anterior chamber 8:cornea 9:iris 10:lens cortex 11:lens nucleus 12:ciliary process 13:conjunctiva 14:inferior oblique muscle 15:inferior rectus muscle 16:medial rectus muscle 17:retinal arteries and veins 18:optic disc 19:dura mater 20:central retinal artery 21:central retinal vein 22:optical nerve 23:vorticose vein 24:bulbar sheath 25:macula 26:fovea 27:sclera 28:choroid 29:superior rectus muscle 30:retina DNA “Human DNA contains more organized information than the Encyclopedia Britannica. If the full text of the encyclopedia were to arrive in computer code from outer space, most people would regard this as proof of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence. But when seen in nature, it is explained as the workings of random forces.”1 -George Sim Johnson E. coli contain about 500 billion atoms. E. coli have 3000-4000 different proteins. DNA and RNA to make and be made by these proteins. Dozens of lipids (membrane) Saccharides Other organic molecules Cause and effect must trace back to a “first cause” (God). Disorder does not lead to order. Complexity cannot arise by chance Design and purpose in nature requires intelligence Ultimately there are only two origins choices (natural or super-natural), and the random, undirected processes of evolution are incapable of creating life or advancing it to higher forms, or explaining how something (the universe) came from nothing - the super-natural is necessary! The Biblical revelation – which we will talk about in next week Design a robot: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Less than 1/4 inch tall Can carry heavy loads Can dig large holes Can cross any terrain Can find its own energy sources Can make other robots like itself Do this and you would be famous - people would marvel at your skills This work has been done The robot is called an “ant” We squash them because they are trivial and unimportant compared to man Complex things require a designer, intelligence, and a plan! Macro-evolution has NO designer, NO intelligence, NO plan! “All the evidence available in the biological sciences supports the core proposition of traditional natural theology– that the cosmos is a specially designed whole with life and mankind as its fundamental goal and purpose, a whole in which all facets of reality, from the size of galaxies to the thermal capacity of water, have their meaning and explanation in this central fact.” (Michael Denton, Nature’s Destiny, p. 389) “There is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all....It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature's numbers to make the Universe....The impression of design is overwhelming.” - Paul Davies “As we survey all the evidence, the thought insistently arises that some supernatural agency - or, rather, Agency - must be involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without intending to, we have stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence of a Supreme Being? Was it God who stepped in and so providentially crafted the cosmos for our benefit? (George Greenstein) A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question. (Fred Hoyle) For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries. (Robert Jastrow) “Since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities – his eternal power and divine nature –have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.” Romans 1:20 Do you have the faith to be an atheist??? Join us next Friday for our next presentation: “The Holy Bible: Examine the Evidence!” Disciples of the Cross - A diverse CCNY student group dedicated to teaching and living out the Bible! www.nycicc.org – New York City Intl’ Christian Church See me for any further references and Bibliography info! Thank you for your attention! Disciples of the Cross – A diverse CCNY student group dedicated to teaching and living out the Bible! (Matthew 28:18-20) Join us for our informal “Bible Talk” discussion! Thursdays @ 1:00PM – NAC Cafeteria QUESTIONS?
© Copyright 2024