Society of Women Engineers Region A 2015 Conference University of the Pacific Stockton, CA Student Poster Session and Competition Abstract Submission Deadline: December 15, 2014 Poster Session: February 21, 2015 Students are invited to participate in a technical Student Poster Session and Competition hosted by Region A of The Society of Women Engineers as part of the 2015 Regional Conference at the University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA. To participate, students must first submit an abstract (see requirements below). The abstracts will be peer-reviewed by a multidisciplinary panel of engineers. Abstracts meeting the requirements and containing sufficient technical content (see evaluation criteria below) will be accepted. Students with accepted abstracts are invited to display their posters at the Student Poster Session, hosted as a part of the 2015 Regional Conference. Students wishing to participate in the Student Poster Competition will be asked to informally present their posters to a panel of judges, answering questions from the judges and engaging in a technical discussion of the work presented. Awards for the best poster presentations will be announced at the Saturday Awards Banquet. Students may prepare abstracts and posters based on content from their own original research or based on content originating from their school projects or from projects that were completed as a part of co-op/internship experiences or other relevant experiences that resulted in original work. The subject matter presented must be related to engineering and the work must be understandable to a general technical audience. There will be two submission categories: Undergraduate and Graduate. To be eligible for the Student Poster Session and Competition, the participants must be current SWE Collegiate members. Abstract Guidelines Abstracts must be submitted using the template provided. The abstract should include a descriptive title and a list of authors (as applicable). The first author shall be the author presenting the poster at the conference. The abstract should give a clear indication of the: 1) project motivation, 2) objectives, 3) scope of work, 4) general methodology, and 5) most pertinent results. The abstract should provide a broad overview of the technical research or project so that readers may evaluate the work’s original and technical content. The abstract must provide a concise summary of the research or project. Since the abstract will be evaluated by a multi-disciplinary panel, the abstract must be written so that it is understandable to a general technical audience. The abstract must contain no more than 500 words (exclusive of the title and author list) and must be submitted to [email protected] (using the template provided) by December 15, 2014, 5 p.m. Pacific Standard Time. Poster Guidelines The poster should describe original research or an original project with an application in engineering. The project can be the product of laboratory work, computer simulations, modeling project, or analysis of a data set, but it is important that it is new work, unique to you, and is not a review article in which you summarize the work of others. You can use a current project that you are working on alone, as an independent study project, or a project that you are working on as part of a team. Research and projects completed as part of university course work and work produced as the result of co-ops/internships are eligible. The poster is to be prepared so that it contains a concise and visual presentation of the work that can be easily understood in the absence of the author. The poster should be 48 inches wide by 36 inches tall, and no larger than this. The poster should be printed by the participant and delivered to the conference prior to opening ceremonies on Saturday, February 21, 2015. Bringing the poster on Friday, February 20, 2015, during early registration, is preferred. When submitting your abstract, attach a pdf containing the following information: Applicant Information: Name University/College (Collegiate Section) Major Student Status (undergraduate or graduate student) Phone number Email address Abstract Information: Title of Technical Research Author(s) Name – acknowledge those who have participated significantly in the technical aspects of the research Category (options are research, school project, project from co-op/internship experience, other with a description provided) Abstract – limited to 500 words Questions concerning the student poster competition can be directed to [email protected] with the subject line SWE Region A 2015 Student Poster Session. Abstract Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Criteria Title is brief and descriptive Project motivation is clearly stated and sound Project objectives are clearly stated and logical Project scope/methodology is briefly described and appropriate Results are summarized Conclusion is provided and is concise Work contributes to the field of engineering Work contains sufficient technical content Abstract is well-organized and has logical progression Writing style and tone are appropriate and professional Spelling and grammar are correct TOTAL Points Available 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 100 Points Earned Helpful Hints for preparing your Abstract: 1. State results, conclusions, or findings in a clear and concise fashion. However, make sure that you describe your project adequately. You have 500 words - make sure to take advantage of this. 2. Assume that the reader has a good general technical vocabulary but avoid use of highly specialized words or abbreviations. 3. Use past tense and third person when describing completed research, and present tense when stating existing facts. 4. Have a colleague read your abstract to make sure it communicates well. Poster Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Criteria Technical Content Title is representative of the work completed Project motivation and objectives are clear Methodologies are clearly and briefly presented Results are clear and support the project objectives Results are supported by graphs, tables, etc. Conclusions are derived from the results Research/project approach is sound Work contains sufficient technical content Work contributes to the field of engineering Appearance of Poster Title, author list, and affiliations are provided Content is organized into logical sections (e.g. Introduction, Objectives, Methods, Results, Conclusion) Graphics are appropriately referenced Poster is visually appealing with nice spacing, good amount of content (not overcrowded), legible lettering, contrast between components and background, good use of color, variety of materials presented (e.g. photos, schematics) Writing style and tone of written elements are appropriate and professional Spelling and grammar are correct TOTAL Points Available Points Earned 5 5 5 5 10 5 10 10 10 5 5 5 10 5 5 100 Helpful Hints for preparing your Poster: 1. Title, name of author(s), and school should be easily recognized by the reader. 2. Do not use more than two type fonts. Use bold, italic, and font size to set type differently. 3. Stick to a color scheme. 4. Stay consistent with spaces between text, figures, and headings. The spacing in the poster should not be crammed. 5. Words should be large enough to read from several feet away. 6. Figures and graphs should be labeled. 7. Have a colleague look at your poster to make sure that it could be understood without the presence of the author. 8. Ensure that the Introduction, Objectives, Approach, Results, and Conclusion sections are clear. Poster Presentation Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Criteria Delivery is smooth, indicating that the student practiced Delivery is lively and engaging Research/project is delivered in a logical manner Content is understandable to a general technical audience Poster is referred to throughout the presentation Presenter is dressed appropriately Presenter answers questions professionally TOTAL Points Available 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 70 Points Earned
© Copyright 2024