Culturaladaptationandvalidation ofCOPSOQ-ISTAS21inArgentina Explorationofitsscopeand preventionadvantages ArgentineValidationofCOPSOQISTAS21 Agreementbetween: Grupo de Estudios en Salud Ambiental y Laboral (GESAL) - UniversidaddeAvellaneda ÁreadeInvestigacionesenSalud- SuperintendenciadeRiesgosdelTrabajo COPSOQARGGROUP ArgentineValidationofCOPSOQISTAS21 Aimofthestudy: Cultural adaptation and validation of COPSOQ- ISTAS21 to theArgentineculturalcontext. Stepstowardstheargentineanversion Contentvalidity Structureoftheargentineanquestionnnaire 1.Exigenciasenel trabajo 1.1.Exigenciascuantitativas 1.2.Ritmo 1.3.Exigenciascognitivas 1.4.Exigenciasemocionales 1.5.Exigenciadeesconderemociones 2.Doblepresencia 2.Doblepresencia 3.Organizacióny sentidodel trabajo 3.1.Autonomía 3.2.Posibilidadesdedesarrollo 3.3.Variedad 3.4.Sentidodeltrabajo 3.5.Controlsobrelostiemposa disposición 3.6Compromiso 4.Relaciones 4.1.Previsibilidad interpersonales 4.2.Claridadderol yliderazgo 4.3.Conflictoderol 4.4.Calidaddeliderazgo 4.5.Apoyodecompañeros/as 4.6.Apoyodesuperiores 4.7.Sentimientodegrupo 4.8.Reconocimiento 5.Inseguridad laboral 6.Confianza 7.Justicia 5.1.Inseguridadenelempleo 5.2.Flexibilidadinterna 6.1.Confianzavertical 6.2.Confianzahorizontal 7.Justicia Semanticadaptation Intentionalsample,maximumvariation, reachingtheoreticalsaturation-18cases Educational level Incomplete Primary Complete primaryand incomplete secondary Complete secondaryand more Men -30years Women +30years -30years Livestocklaborer, Maintenance service,Cleaning service Administrative, Livestocklaborer, Babysitter Cleaningservice, Cleaningservice Motorman Assistant Motorman Assistant +30years Receptionist Porter Hotelemployee, Teacher,Lab Cleaningservice, technician Cleaningservice,Call centeremployee Semanticadaptation Interpretationalexpected difficulties Theoretical Example: parity 1.5.2.¿Enquémedidasutrabajo exigequeescondasus emociones? Analysis Interpretationalemerged difficulties Example: 1.4.2.Conquéfrecuenciasutrabajo consisteenatenderproblemasde otros? Handbook:Recordarevaluar C o n f u s i o n a b o u t w h o w e r e interpretaciónderespuestaen “otros”. sentidodecontenidodetrabajo. Amplification in the questionnaire: “quenoseancompañerosojefes” Semanticadaptation Interpretationalexpected difficulties W o r d ´ s Example: clearness 1.1.1. ¿Con qué frecuencia la d i s t r i b u c i ó n d e t a r e a s e s irregular y provoca que se le Junte/acumuletrabajo? Analysis Questionnaire:Synonymadded Interpretationalemerged difficulties Example: Questionswith“¿Enquémedida…” wereconfusing.Wechangedthem to“¿Conquéfrecuencia…” Handbook:Responsecard Semanticadaptation * Wechangedtheintrodutionofintensityquestionsandintensity categoriestofrequencyones. * Thedimensions“Workdemands”and“Confidence”presented variousmissinterpretations. * Ifoneitemdoesn´tapplytoawork-placetheresponsemustbe registered in the categorie that represents no risk exposure. Ej: Hotelwithoutbranchofficesinthedimension“Workinsecurity”. Criterionandconstructvalidity Sociodemographic andemploymentdata LongversionCoPsoQ ArgQuestionnaire SF12.Criterion Validity First7questions Questions1.1.1.a7.1.4. Healthmodule Last12questions Criterionandconstructvalidity Sampling: * 200workersstratifiedbysex * Fieldworktookplacebetween22/08/15andel11/09/15 * 4districtsofMetropolitanAreaofBuenosAires (CapitalFederal,Avellaneda,MorónyVicenteLópez) Criterionandconstructvalidity Criterionandconstructvalidity Questionnaireaplication * Theinterviewdurationwas30minutesorlessinthe90%ofthecases. * Sometirednesswasnoticed,sowedecidedto: 1. Createtwocontrolgroupsbytherotationofthedimensions. 100interviewsweredoneintheoriginalorder,50startingin“Work organizationandmeaning”and50with“Confidence”. 2. 10%oftheintervieweewerecapturedbycontact. Criterionandconstructvalidity Sociodemographiccharacteristics(n=200) Sex -Women 48,5% -Men 51,5% MeanAge 40,3years(Std.Dev:12,5,Median:39,5) Educationallevel -Primaryschoolcomplete 15,7% -Secondaryschoolcomplete 48,5% -Tertiaryschoolcomplete 17,7% -Universitarylevelormore 18,2% Criterionandconstructvalidity Employmentcharacteristics(n=200) Economicactivity -Agriculturalandextractive 1% -Manufacturing 11,5% -Electricity,gasandwatersupply 1,5% -Construction 2,5% -Tradeandhotelery 21,5% -Transport,storageandcommunications 10% -Financialintermediation 8% -Community,socialandpersonalserviceactivities 44% Criterionandconstructvalidity Employmentcharacteristics(n=200) Mediancompanysize 46workers(5caseswithmorethan1000) Meanweeklyhoursofwork 40,1hours(Std.Dev.12,5,Median:41) Typeofemployment -Permanent 85% -Notpermanent 15% Stepstowardstheargentineanversion CurrentStep Nextstep Purposesandfuturesteps * To share the interest about this topic with the Argentinean Labor Risks System stake holders (employers, worker´s union, healthprofessionals). * To promote the Psychosocial Risks´s prevention in every professionandeconomicactivity. * Todevelopnationalreferencevalues. * Todevelopanabbreviatedversion. * Increase the knowledge production about Psychosocial Risks throughresearchinArgentinecompanies. Thankyouforyourattention MarcosAlberto,MarceloAmable,AdelaContreras,CeciliaCornelio, JohannaGerke,RocíoGonzalezFrancese,LucianaReif,ConstanzaZelaschi [email protected] [email protected] www.srt.gob.ar www.undav.edu.ar
© Copyright 2024