1. No category

Claves sobre la Justicia Abierta
(Open Judiciary Keys)
Carlos E. Jiménez-Gómez (@estratic)
IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology, Distinguished Lecturer
IEEE e-Government, Chair
Open Government Partnership Global Summit
Ciudad de México, 28/10/2015
ICT in Public Organizations: Evolution
E-Justice
2
2/18/2016
Society on Social Implications of Technology
• Research (2012) related ICT impact in justice
• Among other results… openness and modernization
in judiciary
• …Then we continue with new research works…
•Can we say that e-Justice will evolve like e-Government is
evolving towards Open Government?
•What initiatives are being done?
•We did a new research (2014). Open State (openness in executive
and legislative power)  Also Openness in Judiciary?
Research: “Justicia abierta: transparencia y proximidad de la
justicia dentro del actual contexto de Open Government”
3
2/18/2016
Society on Social Implications of Technology
Open Judiciary (Justicia Abierta)
Definition
Open Government philosophy and principles



Transparency,
Participation
Collaboration
Applied and contextualized in the judiciary and justice field
Key tools:
 Innovation
 ICT
4
2/18/2016
(Jimenez-Gomez, 2014)
Society on Social Implications of Technology
More than 100 initiatives analyzed
More than 100 respondents to an international survey
Social Network Analysis (Twitter)
9 In Depth Interviews
23 Indicators for classification
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Public policy and strategy
Jurisdictional function
Government of judiciary
Administration and means
Citizens
&
professional
connection
Link with other governmental
institutions
Level (Country, State, Local)
Participation principle
6.
7.
8.
5
2/18/2016
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Collaboration principle
Transparency principle
Innovation
Access/Closeness to justice
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Public
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Private
People
Internal
External
Instrumental
Functional
(operative)
22. Geographic (Intl.,)
23. Focus
Society on Social Implications of Technology
Key elements identified:
Strategic view
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
6
State Treaty and institutional renewal.
Roadmap
Strategy & public policy
Global accountability perspective
Wish to advance to a more open
system
Access, closeness & citizen-oriented
Coordinated
courtstrategy
and
communicated
answers
(incentives/penalties)
Legal coverage
Service integration in judicial system
Supervision
and
evaluation.
Effectiveness & targets achieved
measurement
Continuosus and interdisciplinary
education
Standardization
of
processes,
protocols and models
Looking for public-private partnership
in courts
Support to local programs
Innovation & new ways to dispute
resolution/s
Systemic impact, specially related to
the community
Volunteering & facilities to support
activities
2/18/2016
Capabilities & Tools
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Leadership & communication
Feedback
Trust and legitimation
Translation from legal to colloquial language
Volunteering
and
informed
decisions.
Mandatory as exception
Confidentiality as key for effectiveness
Standardized data-sets preparation and
machine-readable formats
Access to open data
Data & information visualization tools
Targets avoiding traditional–confrontationalmethods
Easy accesibility to processes
Efficiency and low cost orientation
Easier access to rehabilitation services
Early intervention orientation
Fast inclusion in collaboration programs
Careful preparation and special attention to
relationships between both parties
Prevalence of face to face dialogue
Judicial interaction with every collaborative
justice participant
19. Emphasize team & individuals’ commitments,
related cultural competences
20. Result quality and legality supervision
21. Realistic impact
22. Flexibility, when litigants can be autonomous
Society on Social Implications of Technology
Next, we will talk about Open Judiciary initiatives
in USA, Latin America and China:
Phillip R. Malone (Stanford Law School): USA
Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán (UAEM): Latin America
Mei Gechlik (Stanford Law School): China
Participate in our survey on Open Judiciary (Justicia Abierta):
Available at Stanford Law School, CGCP
http://cgc.law.stanford.edu
Survey available in English, Spanish
and Chinese, until 11/15/2015.
7
2/18/2016
Society on Social Implications of Technology
Muchas
gracias/Thank You!
[email protected]
@estratic
http://about.me/estratic
8
2/18/2016
Society on Social Implications of Technology